[tor-relays] Sorry for my molestation

2014-05-19 Thread zwiebel
I will keep calm next days ... > Gesendet: Montag, 19. Mai 2014 um 18:19 Uhr > Von: "Peter Palfrader" > An: zwie...@quantentunnel.de > Cc: "Tor Assistants" > Betreff: Your tor-relays postings (was: [tor-relays] relay not receiving very > much traffic) > > Hey, > > you have been posting to tor

Re: [tor-relays] relay not receiving very much traffic

2014-05-19 Thread Markus Klock
Will try to change Address to IP instead of hostname. Cool, did not know about the HardwareAccel, enabling it now. Nope, SSL is patched and not vurnable to heartbleed Regards, Markus From: zwie...@quantentunnel.de To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 18:02:47 +0200 Subject

Re: [tor-relays] relay not receiving very much traffic

2014-05-19 Thread zwiebel
torrc looks good in my eyes.   I dont use 'Address'. Did you try the IP 'Address 193.11.113.99' ?   For a higher speed (which we dont talk about today) you can use 'HardwareAccel 1'   I suppose SSL is not bleeding?   Felix (clueless)   Gesendet: Montag, 19. Mai 2014 um 14:26 Uhr Von: "

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

2014-05-19 Thread Spencer Neitzke
Hi zwiebel, I have informed Linode of this and they are perfectly fine with it. As for the uptime, I just started this a few days ago and have been tweaking the rules every now and then to achieve the best results. If I understand it correctly the Stable tag should be added to my relay after 7

Re: [tor-relays] relay not receiving very much traffic

2014-05-19 Thread Markus Klock
I uploaded my current torrc here: http://pastebin.com/iJjawwf6 any help tuning it is appreciated! Regards, Markus From: markus_kl...@hotmail.com To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 12:35:05 +0200 Subject: Re: [tor-relays] relay not receiving very much traffic > > It l

Re: [tor-relays] relay not receiving very much traffic

2014-05-19 Thread Markus Klock
> > It looks like your node is running as guard. This usually drops your > > traffic for a while before it builds up again. > > Tim is referring to the phenomenon described here: > https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay Yeah I read it and figured that enough time have passed

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

2014-05-19 Thread zwiebel
Next hi I find your IP could be on http://www.linode.com. If right I see in https://www.linode.com/pricing there is a monthly(?!) transfer limit of 3TB to 16TB on first glance. Be careful not to run into volume (and extra cost) trouble. Reduce bandwidth to a even lower value until you know things

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

2014-05-19 Thread zwiebel
Hi It seems something is wrong with your relay. Look at https://consensus-health.torproject.org/ and search your Nickname. You will see it is not voted to be stable. Further if you check for https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/21F84E3EC92BA954307C28A8B302F52F55E5A54D you will see drop-out time

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

2014-05-19 Thread Jodie Miu
No, you haven't misconfigured anything, from what I can see. What atlas is reporting is the Observed Bandwidth, which is the average bandwidth observed over the time it's been up. If you hover over the 4.15 mb/s number, you'll see the Bandwidth rate and Bandwidth burst as reported by your server.