Re: [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?

2014-03-09 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 12:21:11PM -0400, Tora Tora Tora wrote: > I am pretty sure the answer is "NO", but is there a way to "enhance" > Tor in such a way that a relay that does not host hidden services > can also choose not to carry traffic for hidden services? > those who want to use hidden servi

Re: [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?

2014-03-09 Thread Tora Tora Tora
I am pretty sure the answer is "NO", but is there a way to "enhance" Tor in such a way that a relay that does not host hidden services can also choose not to carry traffic for hidden services? That way those who want to use hidden services can do so by using more limited subset of the Tor netwo

[tor-relays] IPV6 exit

2014-03-09 Thread tor
Hello, i run some exits they have IPV4 and IPV6 i did bind OR port to IPV4 and IPV6 which works good. I can connect to them using IPV6 but i can't exit to IPV6 destinations. I did set IPv6Exit 1 in torrc but it's not possible to exit to a ipV6 destination. Did i miss something? what else to do to

Re: [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?

2014-03-09 Thread ra
On Sunday 09 March 2014 14:02:39 Andrew Lewman wrote: > On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 05:03:32PM -0800, beatthebasta...@inbox.com wrote 1.0K bytes in 0 lines about: > : Tor hidden services – a safe haven for cybercriminals > : The inevitable move - 64-bit ZeuS has come enhanced with Tor > : ChewBacca -

Re: [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?

2014-03-09 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 05:03:32PM -0800, beatthebasta...@inbox.com wrote 1.0K bytes in 0 lines about: : Tor hidden services – a safe haven for cybercriminals : The inevitable move - 64-bit ZeuS has come enhanced with Tor : ChewBacca - a new episode of Tor-based Malware Replace the word "Tor" wit