Re: [tor-relays] Traffic in port 9050 in a relay (denial of service attack?)

2013-11-11 Thread Jeroen Massar
On 2013-11-11 19:23, Luther Blissett wrote: > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 14:00 +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote: >> On 2013-11-06 13:47 , mick wrote: >>> On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:00:09 +0200 >>> Lars Noodén allegedly wrote: >>> On 11/06/2013 01:26 PM, mick wrote: > I disagree. Dropping all traffic oth

Re: [tor-relays] Traffic in port 9050 in a relay (denial of service attack?)

2013-11-11 Thread Luther Blissett
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 14:00 +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote: > On 2013-11-06 13:47 , mick wrote: > > On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:00:09 +0200 > > Lars Noodén allegedly wrote: > > > >> On 11/06/2013 01:26 PM, mick wrote: > >>> I disagree. Dropping all traffic other than that which is > >>> explicitly require

Re: [tor-relays] Does TOR need TUN/TAP

2013-11-11 Thread Drake Wilson
Quoth Sebastian Pfeifer , on 2013-11-11 20:36:02 +0100: > Hello! > A short question I didn't found in the FAQ or with Google: "Does Tor (as > an exit node) need a TUN or TAP device"? It does not require tun/tap; Tor runs over and exits through TCP sockets exclusively, last I checked. However: >

Re: [tor-relays] Does TOR need TUN/TAP

2013-11-11 Thread Anonymous
11.11.2013 21:36, Sebastian Pfeifer kirjoitti: > Hello! > A short question I didn't found in the FAQ or with Google: "Does Tor (as > an exit node) need a TUN or TAP device"? > I am a poor pupil and with my provider servers without TUN/TAP (VRS) are > 1€ cheaper per month than the ones with (KVM). >

[tor-relays] Does TOR need TUN/TAP

2013-11-11 Thread Sebastian Pfeifer
Hello! A short question I didn't found in the FAQ or with Google: "Does Tor (as an exit node) need a TUN or TAP device"? I am a poor pupil and with my provider servers without TUN/TAP (VRS) are 1€ cheaper per month than the ones with (KVM). LG Sebastian -- vy 73 de Sebastian Pfeifer OE6SPD Folg

Re: [tor-relays] Setting UP an Tor exit node with resrictions

2013-11-11 Thread Anonymous
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 11.11.2013 20:08, krishna e bera kirjoitti: > On 13-11-11 12:56 PM, Anonymous wrote: >> How may I create an Tor exit node with some ports and sites >> blacklisted? > > See the Reduced Exit Policy page referred to at > https://blog.torproject.org/blo

Re: [tor-relays] Setting UP an Tor exit node with resrictions

2013-11-11 Thread krishna e bera
On 13-11-11 12:56 PM, Anonymous wrote: > How may I create an Tor exit node with some ports and sites blacklisted? See the Reduced Exit Policy page referred to at https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tips-running-exit-node-minimal-harassment > So the user trying to enter an blacklisted page will get a

[tor-relays] Setting UP an Tor exit node with resrictions

2013-11-11 Thread Anonymous
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello! How may I create an Tor exit node with some ports and sites blacklisted? So the user trying to enter an blacklisted page will get an page saying that the maintainer has denied the access to that page/site. I whould like to deny access to

Re: [tor-relays] exit and skype

2013-11-11 Thread David Carlson
On 11/10/2013 5:37 AM, Thomas Hand wrote: > > This is true. Some websites download lists of all relays and just mass > block the ips. Its usually webmasters who have no idea how tor works > and don't realise that a middle relay poses them no threat whatsoever. > This is why education is best. If so

[tor-relays] (no subject)

2013-11-11 Thread bbzxrmy wowman
00:11][BlakbirdzejA] ()+_earth changes spawning chaos releases, react to time speeding, and proclaim a more established eternia for all exisT. aviod control, imperge immortality and fight with new designs without permitting harm, devour opposites,  refrain from weakness hiding in false powers.