Dave,
Unless I am mistaken, your non-exit relay never connects to a web page.
Only exit relays do that, so it can't be your IP that is blocked but
whatever exit relay you may be connecting through.
On 11/9/2013 11:15 PM, David Carlson wrote:
On 11/9/2013 10:15 AM, Jon Gardner wrote:
On Nov
On 11/9/2013 10:15 AM, Jon Gardner wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Jan Hendrik den Besten wrote:
>
>> Boy, now I am in trouble...
>>
>> I run an exit node from my home address for a few weeks now, but my gf
>> starts complaining she cannot use Skype anymore to chat with her mum.
>>
>> I under
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 06:19:16PM +0100, elri...@elrippoisland.net wrote 5.8K
bytes in 0 lines about:
: I did some graphs of the attacks raiding against the network and the method
is
: quite interesting.
Perhaps I missed something, what are the attacks? These graphs show some
sort of numbers i
If you have 50 down and 10 up, then the 10 is your number. The lower of the
two.
As a relay, all data you receive, you send out again. So you have 1280 KB of
potential relay capacity.
Your ISP probably has a FUP you may violate if you constantly use up all your
bandwidth.
You could set your
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 07:59:45PM +0100, Oliver Schönefeld wrote:
> my ISP is offering 50 Mbps downstream 10 Mbps up, so i thought i'd
> share 20 Mbps max and 15 Mbps avg (respectively 2560 KBps max and 1920
> KBps avg) in a inner tor-relay.
> so i put the latter vaues in the bandwith-limits tab o
On 2013-11-09 19:59:45 (+0100), Oliver Schönefeld wrote:
>
> my ISP is offering 50 Mbps downstream 10 Mbps up, so i thought i'd share 20
> Mbps max and 15 Mbps avg (respectively 2560 KBps max and 1920 KBps avg) in a
> inner tor-relay.
If I'm not mistaken, you should stick to 10 Mbps. You're a r
hey folks
i'm having some issues with my bandwidth...
my ISP is offering 50 Mbps downstream 10 Mbps up, so i thought i'd share 20
Mbps max and 15 Mbps avg (respectively 2560 KBps max and 1920 KBps avg) in a
inner tor-relay.
so i put the latter vaues in the bandwith-limits tab of the sharing opti
Hi List :)
Paul Syverson:
> You may want to take a look at
> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/life-without-ca
What about the Perspectives addon?
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~perspectives/
(or http://perspectives-project.org/ where it redirects me)
and the talk "BlackHat USA 2011: SSL And The Future Of
On 11/09/2013 11:32 AM, tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
> Using a VPN *might* work, but Microsoft blocks access from many of those too.
>
> Complaining to Microsoft, especially if you're a paying Skype customer, might
> not help, but it can't hurt.
Same boat but with two woman o
On 13-11-08 12:04 AM, bbzxrmy wowman wrote:
>
> high, i recently set my relay and also mailing list, however my screen
> name "BBZzXArmy does not show on the tor world map, can anyone confirm
> or help me with this im pissed at it
According to the Tor Directory Protocol v3 (search for "named")
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 21:30:13 +0600
Roman Mamedov allegedly wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 12:50:18 +
> mick wrote:
>
> > I don't see any problem per se with a self-signed certificate on a
> > site which does not purport to protect anything sensitive (such as
> > financial transactions). The pro
On Nov 5, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Jan Hendrik den Besten wrote:
> Boy, now I am in trouble...
>
> I run an exit node from my home address for a few weeks now, but my gf
> starts complaining she cannot use Skype anymore to chat with her mum.
>
> I understand Microsoft blocks all tor exits from accessi
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 12:50:18 +
mick wrote:
> I don't see any problem per se with a self-signed certificate on a site
> which does not purport to protect anything sensitive (such as financial
> transactions). The problem with this particular certificate is that
> the common name identifier is b
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 09:22:12 -0500
Paul Syverson allegedly wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 12:50:18PM +, mick wrote:
> > >
> > I don't see any problem per se with a self-signed certificate on a
> > site which does not purport to protect anything sensitive (such as
> > financial transactions)
> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 17:12:37 +
> From: Thomas Hand
> To: tor-relays
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] exit and skype
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> If you want to continue using skype, you could invest in a VPN just to hide
> it from your ISP and ma
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 12:50:18PM +, mick wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 20:15:51 +0100
> elrippo allegedly wrote:
>
> > Jope. I tend to have some issues with some CA's.
> > But yes you are right, i should get me a decent certificate.
> > I will do that, promise.
> >
> > You self signed your
On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 20:15:51 +0100
elrippo allegedly wrote:
> Jope. I tend to have some issues with some CA's.
> But yes you are right, i should get me a decent certificate.
> I will do that, promise.
>
> You self signed your site certificate...?
>
>
>
I don't see any problem per se with a s
17 matches
Mail list logo
