> hello there!
> very interesting information you shared here, thank you.
> while i dont have any further information to rely on,
> i would still like to share a few simple thoughts.
>
You're welcome.
> lets assume for a second that there are no errors in the code and that Tor
> is not using a sig
Hi,
Thanks for the helpful replies & also the link provided make it very
clear.
I will go ahead with my bridge relay.
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:47:33 -0400, Roger Dingledine
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:17:01PM +0200, Sebastian G. wrote:
>> > Tor documentation suggests as little as 20 KB/
Hi,
we're currently looking forward to expand our contribution to the Tor
network and as a mathematically fascinated person, I'm pretty much into
statistical data from https://metrics.torproject.org/network.html at the
moment and implication on Accounting/Bandwidthrate configuration
opportunities
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:17:01PM +0200, Sebastian G. wrote:
> > Tor documentation suggests as little as 20 KB/s can be used to run a tor
> > relay but this seems to be a very low badwidth rate.
>
> As far as I know there were some changes that only with 30 KB/s will see
> something one would ca
freef...@mail.md:
> Hi!
Hi there!
(I'm not an Tor official nor should you weight my opinion too much)
> I have around 50-60 KB/s of bandwidth that I'd like to use for running a
> bridge relay.
Great.
> Is this a sufficient amount of bandwidth? I ask because it doesn't seem
> like very much com
Hi!
I have around 50-60 KB/s of bandwidth that I'd like to use for running
a bridge relay.
Is this a sufficient amount of bandwidth? I ask because it doesn't
seem like very much compared to the amounts that others donate to the
tor network.
Tor documentation suggests as little as 20 KB/s c
