Re: [topbraid-users] best practice for using dublin core in tbc

2024-10-08 Thread 'Luis Enrique Ramos García' via TopBraid Suite Users
Thanks so much David, for your answer. If that is the only one solution you have for now , I will try it out. Best R. Luis Ramos El mar, 8 oct 2024 a las 14:22, David Price () escribió: > The TTL file that you link is full of rdfs:Class statements, so in fact > the Protege view of those cla

[topbraid-users] custom Constructor for new Concept

2024-10-08 Thread elvin.d...@gmail.com
This question concerns the dash:Constructor class assigned to the skos:Concept class. Let's say I wanted to modify the + or 'New' button behaviour when adding concepts to an existing ConceptScheme. How would I be able to reference an existing conceptscheme so I can properly add the skos:topConc

Re: [topbraid-users] best practice for using dublin core in tbc

2024-10-08 Thread Holger Knublauch
Hi Luis, after you have imported that graph, try Transform > Convert OWL Axioms to SHACL Constraints (keeping the OWL axioms). This should assert the missing rdfs:subClassOf triples. Classes without any named superclass cannot be navigated to in the class hierarchy, even if they do exist in gen

Re: [topbraid-users] best practice for using dublin core in tbc

2024-10-08 Thread Holger Knublauch
Could you export the ontology for me so that I can see which actual triples are in there? I had prior to my email just downloaded the DC Terms TTL and used RDF File import to add its triples to an empty Ontology. Holger > On 8 Oct 2024, at 2:15 PM, 'Luis Enrique Ramos García' via TopBraid Su

Re: [topbraid-users] best practice for using dublin core in tbc

2024-10-08 Thread David Price
The TTL file that you link is full of rdfs:Class statements, so in fact the Protege view of those classes is actually “wrong” because they are not owl:Class. Protege must be pretending they are OWL for you or perhaps have some internal processing of well-known ontologies. In these cases in EDG,

Re: [topbraid-users] best practice for using dublin core in tbc

2024-10-08 Thread Holger Knublauch
Thanks. I did import that file and re-run the transform and I can see the classes just fine. I guess you may be on an older version that did not handle rdfs:Classes in the same way that newer versions do? Holger > On 8 Oct 2024, at 2:21 PM, 'Luis Enrique Ramos García' via TopBraid Suite > Us

Re: [topbraid-users] best practice for using dublin core in tbc

2024-10-08 Thread Holger Knublauch
In any case, if you just want to see these classes, use the Local Assets panel, or the Class List panel with the "also show rdfs:Classes" option activated. Holger > On 8 Oct 2024, at 2:21 PM, 'Luis Enrique Ramos García' via TopBraid Suite > Users wrote: > > Sure! > > > attached are the tll

Re: [topbraid-users] best practice for using dublin core in tbc

2024-10-08 Thread 'Luis Enrique Ramos García' via TopBraid Suite Users
The current version I am working on is: Version: 7.8.1 (20240214-1729). I tried importing again the current output, and transforming it, but it does not work as expected. With the local assets tab, at least I can visualize the elements of the file. Luis El mar, 8 oct 2024 a las 14:27, Holger

[topbraid-users] Re: best practice for using dublin core in tbc

2024-10-08 Thread 'Luis Enrique Ramos García' via TopBraid Suite Users
Hi Carl, Thanks for your answer, and sorry for my late reply. i followed the procedure you indicated: " You could also create an actual Ontology asset collection for it in EDG and then import the TTL into this," more precisely, this file: https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core

Re: [topbraid-users] best practice for using dublin core in tbc

2024-10-08 Thread 'Luis Enrique Ramos García' via TopBraid Suite Users
Hi Holger, Thanks so much for your quick answer. Unfortunately, I just tried that: [image: 2024-10-08_14h08_12.png] In the list only appears an (company internal) ontology listed, thus I did not select it. but I clicked the "Convert, keeping OWL axioms" button anyway. However, the result is th