Hi Holger,
Thank you for the extensive response.
I'll go with your ADS suggestion:
If you need to continue to use external XSLT, the SPARQL endpoint itself is
NOT an option either, because if you run a CONSTRUCT there it can only
produce abbreviated RDF/XML. However, you could use this SPARQL
Dear colleagues,
TopQuadrant is extending its team. We actively interviewing and are excited
about growth we've been experiencing over the last year. Currently, we have
open positions in Customer Success/Professional Services, Product Development
and Technical Sales. All positions will let you
Hi Rob,
yes you can freely use that one, with no strings attached. We are always
happy if ontologies get converted from OWL to SHACL :)
Do you have a specific metadata annotation in mind so that we can
clarify this, i.e. what license would you suggest for such things?
Note this rule does NO
Great - thanks Holger
I'm thinking of using this version of it as its already in a git project
with an explicit licence I can pull in an has extended options:
https://github.com/sparna-git/owl2shacl
could add licence metadata using ODRL i guess - in this case the repo will
suffice as the content
