-4.0 gets a bit more refined?
For that matter, is it fixed yet in 4.0?
Thanks in advance.
Ed
> -Original Message-
> From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 2:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Multipart and mod_jk
>
>
t;
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 9:55 AM
Subject: RE: Multipart and mod_jk
It's a known bug in ajp13.
I'll try to fix before 3.2.1 ;-)
"Pour la plupart des hommes, se corriger consiste à changer de défauts."
-- Voltaire
>-Original Mess
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Multipart and mod_jk
>
>
>Is this a bug on ajp13 or on O'Reilly package??
>
>andrea
>
>At 09.48 12/12/2000 +0800, you wrote:
>>Use mod_jk with AJP12 (not AJP13) will work
>>
>>Kenneth Kwan
>>
>> -Origin
Is this a bug on ajp13 or on O'Reilly package??
andrea
At 09.48 12/12/2000 +0800, you wrote:
>Use mod_jk with AJP12 (not AJP13) will work
>
>Kenneth Kwan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: AC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 12:49 AM
>
:RE: Multipart and mod_jk
Is this a bug on ajp13 or on O'Reilly package??
andrea
At 09.48 12/12/2000 +0800, you wrote:
>Use mod_jk with AJP12 (not AJP13) will work
>
>Kenneth Kwan
>
> -
Use mod_jk with AJP12 (not AJP13) will work
Kenneth Kwan
-Original Message-
From: AC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 12:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Multipart and mod_jk
I've got a servlet
This a known bug it seems fixed in the 3.3 branch and will hopefully be
integrated into a 3.2.x maintainace release.
> -Original Message-
> From: AC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 5:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Multipart and mod_jk
>
>
> I've go
