).
Solaris 7 SPARC
> 5. Testing your application with tomcat :-) ( this is
> probably a better
> and more important test than our regression )
> 7. User support/documentation: If you managed to get tomcat3
> working, you
> may be able to help others and reduce the load on
I have reconsidered, and I also believe I will have time to work on the core
and help clean up/document the code. If Tomcat 3.3 gets a chance to run I'll
put as much time as I can afford into it.
Regards,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Percy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
:
Regards,
Michael Percy
Software Engineer
Portera Systems
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/tomcat/release/v3.2-beta-6/bin/win32/i386/
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Dix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 12:26 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: missing page
>
>
> On the web page
> http://jakarta.a
Costin,
I believe there would be (or at least SHOULD be! :) many more contributors
to these projects (Tomcat), but maybe some of us are intimidated by the
level of apparent expertise required for this stuff. (Then again, I know we
have some damn good people on these lists.) I am curious, is this t
should be
sufficient. Expect me to make some noise here in the future. :)
Cheers!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 11:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 4
Michael Percy wrote:
>
Thanks, Costin.
You guys all make it sound like much less pain than I had previously
thought. Maybe Tomcat could use a developer community site akin to what
Mozilla has (www.mozillazine.org) -- people would probably be more willing
to contribute if they felt invited. Also, maybe BugRat could use a
something to replace JServ in *production* environments *right now*, and
that requires active bug-fixing development. That probably also points to
Tomcat 3.2.x or 3.3, 3.x...
Thanks,
Michael Percy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
Costin is an avid developer devoted to this project and technology, and you
are fools to lose him and fork the project. I think it is possible that many
contributors (present and potential future) will follow him. He is one of
the few major contributors not employed by Sun. I don't see why there c
. Thanks for putting all this work into
Tomcat 3.2 again and bringing some guidance to the community. You are the
main force that made this release possible! Well done!
Regards,
Michael Percy
Portera Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Shouldn't the Win32 Build docs and source files be using CRLF instead of
just LF? Admittedly, most *developers* on Win32 systems have a decent text
editor, but everybody has Notepad, which only handles CRLF. Can we do
anything about this oversight?
Thanks,
Mike
2000 3:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Win32 Build Docs have UNIX line endings
>
>
> Michael Percy wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't the Win32 Build docs and source files be using
> CRLF instead of
> > just LF? Admittedly, most *developers* on Win32 systems
12 matches
Mail list logo
