DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21524] - Thread Leak

2003-07-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable

2003-07-12 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: How about making the output buffer size limit configurable? (A value of "-1" could mean indefinite growth, if people know what they are doing.) I also dislike the proposal, but since it's configurable, and off by default I can limit myself to -0. The biggest problem I see is tha

Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable

2003-07-12 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 12:21 AM Subject: Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable > Bill Barker wrote: > >>How about making the output buffer siz

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/generators StaticInterceptor.java

2003-07-12 Thread billbarker
billbarker2003/07/12 01:35:39 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/generators StaticInterceptor.java Log: Add support to the "Default Servlet" for the HTTP/1.1 methods "OPTIONS" and "TRACE" Fix for Bug #21454 (which was technically INVALID, until

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21454] - OPTIONS * and TRACE * don't work as expected

2003-07-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[GUMP] Build timed out - jk2

2003-07-12 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml init.taskdef: guess.os: [echo] build

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21440] - whose target performs a 'forward' does not behave as expected

2003-07-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

help me immediatly

2003-07-12 Thread bhanu singh
Dear please tell me when in tomcat the situation arrisses like it is creating the java fime but not the class file. i am facing this problem, i had given the context path properly and it is also creatin the folder in the work directory so i think the context path is correct. But when i atept to

RE: tomcat job opportunity

2003-07-12 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
I'm interested too, is this open to foreigners? Saludos, Ignacio J. Ortega > -Original Message- > From: Steven Pincus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 5:41 PM > To: Steven Pincus > Subject: tomcat job opportunity > > > Greetings.I work for an executive search

RE: tomcat job opportunity

2003-07-12 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
Some times ( only some times ) i hate reply-to munging :)).. sorry for this very OT.. Saludos, Ignacio J. Ortega > -Original Message- > From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 4:28 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: tomcat job opportu

Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable

2003-07-12 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: > Bill Barker wrote: >>>How about making the output buffer size limit configurable? >>>(A value of "-1" could mean indefinite growth, if people know what they >>>are doing.) >> >> I also dislike the proposal, but since it's configurable, and off by >> default >> I can limit

Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable

2003-07-12 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 8:41 AM Subject: Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > Bill Barker wrote: > >>>How about making the output buffe