DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15693] - Network hangs when running as NT service (with patch)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Questions related to a port of the IIS-connector to Domino I plan toprovide

I am working on a port of the jk2 connector to Domino based on the iis connector. Perhaps it can be included in the normal release later, for now I have some questions which should get me nearer to first beta release of the Domino connector. By the way I am working with TC 4.1.18 JDK 1.3.1_06 and/o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15702] New: - 1.Displaying JSP text---2.Localization of servlets

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Questions related to a port of the IIS-connector to Domino I plan to provide

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 2:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Questions related to a port of the IIS-connector to > Domino I plan to provide > > What version of Domino? Think that new 6.0 is a

RE: Questions related to a port of the IIS-connector to Domino I plan toprovide

"Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29.12.2002 17:48:40: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 2:35 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Questions related to a port of the IIS-connector to > > Domino I plan to provide > >

tcpNoDelay for http11/coyote connectors - but not for JK et.al.

Any special reason why the so-usefull (I am generating small gif's with a quick turn around time) tcpNoDelay config directive is not (documented) as available across all connectors ? See http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/webobjects/ReleaseNotes/WO52RelNotes/WOJSPServlet.html for a similar sto

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10383] - Specially crafted GET request causes the answering httpd process and the answering AJP13 processor to hang indefinitely

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10383] - Specially crafted GET request causes the answering httpd process and the answering AJP13 processor to hang indefinitely

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session ManagerBase.java

billbarker2002/12/29 18:36:26 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session ManagerBase.java Log: Re-enable the unique session-id logic. Submitted By: Tim Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +10 -10 jakarta-tomc

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session ManagerBase.java

billbarker2002/12/29 18:40:04 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session ManagerBase.java Log: Port from Tomcat 4 branch. Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +10 -10 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session

Re: tcpNoDelay for http11/coyote connectors - but not for JK et.al.

- Original Message - From: "Dirk-Willem van Gulik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 4:53 AM Subject: tcpNoDelay for http11/coyote connectors - but not for JK et.al. > > Any special reason why the so-usefull (I am generating small gif's with a >

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

glenn 2002/12/29 20:05:39 Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c Log: Port mod_jk apache 1.3 JkAutoAlias to apache 2.0, 1.3 and 2.0 should be in synch now Revision ChangesPath 1.63 +110 -1jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c Index: mod_j

Re: tcpNoDelay for http11/coyote connectors - but not for JK et.al.

Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > > Any special reason why the so-usefull (I am generating small gif's with a > quick turn around time) tcpNoDelay config directive is not (documented) as > available across all connectors ? The old and common reason - nobody sent the documentation patch yet :-) Cos

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15711] New: - build.xml line 321 uses invalid attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Duplicate session IDs?

Yes that's true if the monotonically increasing value is added to the random number _before_ the hash... and even worse, there is nothing that guarantees that two numbers won't hash to the same value so we're back to the duplicate session id problem. What I was suggesting is adding the integer to

Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

Michael wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: > >> You're probably right that addThread() doesn't need to be public - but >> I don't think it hurts too much either. > > It does when you're trying to refactor a class. It forces you to ask > whether the interface really is used, or can you rearrange

Re: Duplicate session IDs?

"Schnitzer, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes that's true if the monotonically increasing value is added to the > random number _before_ the hash... and even worse, there is nothing that > guarantees that two numbers won't hash to the same value so we're back > to the duplicate session id pro

Re: Duplicate session IDs?

- Original Message - From: "Eric Rescorla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 10:05 PM Subject: Re: Duplicate session IDs? > "Schnitzer, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yes that's true if the monotonically increasing

RE: Questions related to a port of the IIS-connector to Domino I plan to provide

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 7:20 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: Questions related to a port of the IIS-connector > to Domino I plan to provide > > > > > What version of Domino? > > Think

How to configure jni?

Well. I have Apapche 1.3.27 compiled w/ REENTRANT, Tomcat 4.1.17(from rpm) and mod_jk2, compiled w/ Apache1.3 and apr-0.9.1. Also jdk 1.4.1_01. All that running under RedHat 7.3 Configured to use jni worker. When i am starting apache have follows errors in jk2.log: (error ) [jk_workerEnv.c (239)]

Re: Duplicate session IDs?

Eric Rescorla wrote: "Schnitzer, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Yes that's true if the monotonically increasing value is added to the random number _before_ the hash... and even worse, there is nothing that guarantees that two numbers won't hash to the same value so we're back to the duplicat