RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 RELEASE-PLAN-4.0.txt

2001-09-13 Thread Morrison, John
> -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > How was the issue with sun.tools.javac.Main solved? > > > > It is going to be deferred to a future release. Here's the reasoning: > > * Th

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Release Candidate 1 Available

2001-09-13 Thread Stephane Bailliez
> -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > I *finally* got to these suggested patches, and have commited > changes to > catalina.sh, digest.sh, and jasper.sh to implement Cygwin support > consistently and (hopefully) correctly. Could you please try >

RE: [PATCH] TC 4.0 build patch - not a joke

2001-09-13 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi Craig and others in USA, First, I make a point of presenting to you all my condolences for the tragedy which struck the USA, Tuesday last. >Henri, > >I'm not necessarily opposed to this patch -- just want to >understand it a >little better. Basically, it looks like you are trying to do t

URI handling in tomcat 3.2.3

2001-09-13 Thread Lars Oppermann
Hi everyone, we were in progress of moving our project to tomcat 3.2.3 when we came accross the new handling of URIs (release-notes sec. 7.2). Since we are using the URI to transport other hierarchical information then filesystem paths, we have the feeling, that this kind of functionality bel

RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-13 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>Then we need to be sure to encode r->uri in the main branch >and to change r->unparsed_uri to encode(r->uri) in the 3.2 >branch. I am swamped now and will put it on a long todo >list.. if anyone beats me to it. And don't forget to port to j-t-c which is still using for Apache 1.3/2.0 :::

Tomcat4-RC1: parse exception on taglibs

2001-09-13 Thread Rickard Öberg
Hey I've finally managed to get Catalina working with JBoss (I had not set "catalina.base", but no error was produced, just nothing happened). Anyway, the first thing I try is to deploy an app with a taglib JAR, with the TLD inside. But it seems like there's something wrong with the TLD parsing

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 BUILDING.txt

2001-09-13 Thread jean-frederic clere
Hi, What about telling how to get xalan.jar? Like: Xalan could be downloaded from http://xml.apache.org/dist/xalan-j, the xalan.jar file is located in the bin directory of the Xalan installation. Which Xalan should be used? - I have used xalan-j_2_2_D10 - Cheers Jean-frederic [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Tomcat4-RC1: parse exception on taglibs

2001-09-13 Thread Rickard Öberg
Rickard Öberg wrote: > I've finally managed to get Catalina working with JBoss (I had not set > "catalina.base", but no error was produced, just nothing happened). > > Anyway, the first thing I try is to deploy an app with a taglib JAR, > with the TLD inside. But it seems like there's something w

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3580] New: manager webapp: role wrong

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3580

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13Interceptor.java

2001-09-13 Thread larryi
larryi 01/09/13 05:08:07 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13Interceptor.java Log: Set default debug level in Ajp13Request to 0. Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/se

RE: Ajp13Interceptor

2001-09-13 Thread Larry Isaacs
Its hard wired near the end of the Ajp13Request class. Its now fixed. Thanks for finding this. Larry > -Original Message- > From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:10 AM > To: Tomcat Dev List > Subject: Ajp13Interceptor > > > I've notice

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3581] New: Ctx() : Error creating validation mark - java.io.FileNotFoundException

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3581

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3582] New: Tomcat 3.2.1

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3582

Re: Ajp13Interceptor

2001-09-13 Thread Bojan Smojver
Thanks. Bojan Larry Isaacs wrote: > > Its hard wired near the end of the Ajp13Request class. > Its now fixed. Thanks for finding this. > > Larry

RE: URI handling in tomcat 3.2.3

2001-09-13 Thread Marc Saegesser
I agree that this URI handling sucks. I'm the one that committed the change that made it happen and I still think it sucks. However, allowing these encoded characters opens some very large security problems. Also, even if TC 3.2.x allowed these characters, the resulting URL wouldn't be portable

RE: URI handling in tomcat 3.2.3

2001-09-13 Thread Marc Saegesser
Oops, minor correction. Apache actually returns 400 Bad Request Here's the telnet session GET http://localhost:8081/cgi-bin/dumpenv.bat/fu%2fbar HTTP/1.1 server: msaegesserlpt HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 13:51:21 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.19 (Win32) mod_jk Connection: close Tr

RE: Ajp13Interceptor

2001-09-13 Thread GOMEZ Henri
What about adding a debug attributes in server.xml for Ajps & Connectors ? Could be very very very usefull in many circumstances.. - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Bootstrap.java BootstrapService.java

2001-09-13 Thread glenn
glenn 01/09/13 07:26:18 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Bootstrap.java BootstrapService.java Log: Add org.apache.catalina.util.URL to classes preloaded Revision ChangesPath 1.26 +6 -4 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalin

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/ajp Ajp13.java

2001-09-13 Thread jfclere
jfclere 01/09/13 07:29:51 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/ajp Ajp13.java Log: Add javax.servlet.request.key_size for TC4.0 Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +2 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/ajp/Ajp13.java Index: Ajp13.java =

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3582] Tomcat 3.2.1

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3582

Re: Tomcat4-RC1: parse exception on taglibs

2001-09-13 Thread Rickard Öberg
Rickard Öberg wrote: > Rickard Öberg wrote: > > I've finally managed to get Catalina working with JBoss (I had not set > > "catalina.base", but no error was produced, just nothing happened). > > > > Anyway, the first thing I try is to deploy an app with a taglib JAR, > > with the TLD inside. But i

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/bin jasper.sh

2001-09-13 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/09/13 08:22:45 Modified:jasper/src/bin jasper.sh Log: Fix the "jasper.sh" update checked in yesterday: * Do not use an uninitialized CP variable the first time through * Add double quotes as needed in case paths have spaces in them * Add all of the repositories that

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator LocalStrings_es.properties

2001-09-13 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/09/13 08:24:06 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator LocalStrings_es.properties Log: Cosmetic change only. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +1 -3 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/auth

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Release Candidate 1 Available

2001-09-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
I should have "jasper.sh" working correctly now. It was using CP the first time without initializing it, and was missing some double quotes that could cause problems with paths that had spaces in them. Will be fixed in nightly build 20010914 (and rc2). Craig On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Stephane Bail

RE: [PATCH] TC 4.0 build patch - not a joke

2001-09-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 11:44:19 +0200 > From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PATCH] TC 4.0 build patch - not a joke > > Hi Craig and others in USA, > > First, I make a point of prese

Does Jasper use the Context Classpath when compiling JSP's?

2001-09-13 Thread Will England
Greetings! I know there are two (or three) different classpaths within Tomcat 3.2. I asked this question on tomcat-user last week, but no one knew the answer. The question is, does Jasper, when compiling JSP files, use the Context Classpath, which referrs to the WEB-INF/classes directory for

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 BUILDING.txt

2001-09-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:48:25 +0200 > From: jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 BUILDING.txt > > Hi, > > What about tell

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs manager-howto.xml

2001-09-13 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/09/13 08:49:15 Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs manager-howto.xml Log: Use the "manager" role name that the manager web app actually requires. PR: Bugzilla #3580 Submitted by: Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -1 jakar

Ajp13 and setSoLinger

2001-09-13 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi, Did we really need to have a linger set in Ajp13 ? In Ajp13Interceptor there is a : super.setSoLinger(100); Which make us that we'll wait up to 100s before releasing the socket if data must be sent to remote (may be a restarted Apache...) or better drop the all wait befo

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3580] manager webapp: role wrong

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3580

Re: Tomcat4-RC1: parse exception on taglibs

2001-09-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Please do report to the bug tracking system: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ Craig On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Rickard Öberg wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:18:36 +0200 > From: Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Tomcat4-RC1:

FW: [Bug 3543] - pageContext.include() causes "Illegal to flushwithin a custom tag"

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
-- Forwarded Message > From: Erich Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: method park > Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:16:18 +0200 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Bug 3543] - pageContext.include() causes "Illegal to flush > within a custom tag" > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> htt

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3588] New: Make roles of a user available

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3588

RE: [PATCH] TC 4.0 build patch - not a joke

2001-09-13 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>How does the RPM packaging deal with the fact that different JAR files >need to be loaded into different class loaders? If they are all under >"/usr/share/java", I don't see how that can work. The /usr/share/java is in our case only usefull when building the RPM (.spec file). It's a BuildRequir

Re: URI handling in tomcat 3.2.3

2001-09-13 Thread Lars Oppermann
Hi Marc, Thanks for you reply... Marc Saegesser wrote: > I agree that this URI handling sucks. I'm the one that > committed the change that made it happen and I still > think it sucks. However, allowing these encoded characters > opens some very large security problems. From what I unders

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3588] Make roles of a user available

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3588

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/resources ResourceAttributes.java

2001-09-13 Thread remm
remm01/09/13 09:31:42 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/resources ResourceAttributes.java Log: - Make resource attributes non-final. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +5 -5 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3589] New: Cannot process Taglib TLD when deployed through EmbeddedManager MBean

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3589

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 RELEASE-PLAN-4.0.txt

2001-09-13 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/09/13 09:39:52 Modified:.RELEASE-PLAN-4.0.txt Log: Latest status. Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +8 -15 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-PLAN-4.0.txt Index: RELEASE-PLAN-4.0.txt ===

Re: URI handling in tomcat 3.2.3

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
While 3.3 has this behavior as the default, it can be disabled in the config by: Since the release is scheduled to happen by the end of the month, you might consider jumping straight to 3.3. - Original Message - From: "Lars Oppermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMA

[PATCH][Bug 3581] New: Ctx() : Error creating validation mark - java.io.FileNotFoundException

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
Make certain that the directory exists. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 5:52 AM Subject: [DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3581] New: Ctx() : Error creating validation mark - java.io.FileNotFoundException > PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO

[PATCH][ Bug 3581] New: Ctx() : Error creating validation mark - java.io.FileNotFoundException

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
Let's try that again. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 5:52 AM Subject: [DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3581] New: Ctx() : Error creating validation mark - java.io.FileNotFoundException > PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO

RE: URI handling in tomcat 3.2.3

2001-09-13 Thread Marc Saegesser
Lars, I agree with you. These encoded characters should be allowed in URIs and disallowing them is a hack. Like I said, I think the approach sucks. We were faced with a very serious security problem that had to be addressed very quickly and the decision was made that it was better to forbid ce

Re: URI handling in tomcat 3.2.3

2001-09-13 Thread cmanolache
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Lars Oppermann wrote: > > I agree that this URI handling sucks. I'm the one that > > committed the change that made it happen and I still > > think it sucks. However, allowing these encoded characters > > opens some very large security problems. > > From what I understand,

RE: [PATCH][Bug 3581] New: Ctx() : Error creating validation mark - java.io.FileNotFoundException

2001-09-13 Thread Larry Isaacs
Hi Bill, Though this might fix the webxmlval.txt creation, I suspect it still might fail for the same reason, what ever it was, that caused: 2001-09-13 14:44:41 - WorkDirSetup: Creating work dir /var/tomcat/work/kitu.olympe.o2t/ROOT to not actually create the directory. I don't get

RE: URI handling in tomcat 3.2.3

2001-09-13 Thread Larry Isaacs
Be aware that setting this false will open Tomcat 3.3 to the vulnerability it is intended to prevent. Serving JSP source and bypassing security constraints are among the problems. Detecting potential URL trickery early in the handling provides the most reliable fix. Allowing unsafe URL's past th

[PATH} Jspc can't handle taglibs

2001-09-13 Thread Kin-Man Chung
This patch fixes #3529 and #3235, and was provided by Peter Roßbach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I verified the fix with samll test cases. Note that -webapp option has to be used. misto% runsocks cvs diff -u JspC.java Index: JspC.java ===

Re: [PATCH][Bug 3581] New: Ctx() : Error creating validation mark - java.io.FileNotFoundException

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
You're right, I didn't look closely enough. WorkDirSetup claims to have created the directory already. In that case, it is most likely a permissions problem. The easiest is to do "rm -rf $TOMCAT_HOME/work" and re-start tomcat. This is especially true since B2 is the first one to get the defaul

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docstomcat-docs.xsl

2001-09-13 Thread Jon Stevens
on 9/12/01 7:52 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Remove a width="100%" setting from the generated for attributes lists, > to see if that helps avoid problems where the right side of the documentation > pages are cut off for some users. > Nope. That problem happens as a res

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina build.xml

2001-09-13 Thread glenn
glenn 01/09/13 11:56:11 Modified:catalina build.xml Log: Update build, Copy the jndi, activation, and mail jar files only if they are present Revision ChangesPath 1.57 +15 -8 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/build.xml Index: build.xml ===

RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-13 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>7. Evaluate whether anything should be done to deal with the use of >non-thread-safe DateFormat and related classes. The "Date" used in Http10 connector response, is allready handled by stuff I commited some time ago which use a speed hack and return allready processed date String if it was pr

mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-13 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi to all, I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java, and didn't find reference to SSL informations forwarded from WebServer. Should it be fixed before release since it may break the spec ? I could grab code from mod_jk to support that, but I'm pretty busy with my day work and mod_jk fixes f

mod_jk using warp protocol ?

2001-09-13 Thread GOMEZ Henri
What about adding warp protocol to mod_jk and may be adding with functionnalities from ajp14 ? Of course in J-T-C, since mod_jk in J-T must be freezed. ajp14 and warp are very similar, they use the same (it seems) logon system (using md5), and differents protocol encoding but since ajp14 is st

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3591] New: HttpServletResponse.sendError() and sendRedirect() should commit the response

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3591

Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
I interpreted #111 to be the "graceful restart" clean-up problem that was fixed some months ago. - Original Message - From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:13 PM Subject: RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues > >7. Evaluate whethe

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina build.xml

2001-09-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 13 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: 13 Sep 2001 18:56:11 - > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina build.xml > > glenn 01/09/13 11:56:11 > > Modified:catalina build.xml > Log

RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-13 Thread Larry Isaacs
> -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues > > > >7. Evaluate whether anything should be done to deal with the use of > >non-thread-safe DateFormat a

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina build.xml

2001-09-13 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/09/13 12:57:04 Modified:catalina build.xml Log: Revert Glenn's change to build.xml. Revision ChangesPath 1.58 +8 -15 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/build.xml Index: build.xml === RC

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-PLAN-3.3

2001-09-13 Thread larryi
larryi 01/09/13 12:57:38 Modified:.RELEASE-PLAN-3.3 Log: Update to the release plan. Also: Bugs 3572 and 3577 have been added as required for RC1 Bug 3581 has been added as required for RC2 Bug 1482 has been moved to the "fixed in 3.3" catagory Revision

RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-13 Thread Larry Isaacs
Thanks. Do you know if just 3.3 was affected or 3.2.x as well? If you can give me a clue as to what was changed, I can try to determine this. Larry > -Original Message- > From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-13 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> I need CRLF for building on Windows. It appears that some files > were checked in from *nix containing CR's that were not stripped > during the commit. When I checkout or update from Windows, CVS > still adds a CR in front of all LFs. The result is CRCRLF which > Dev Studio wants to fix. I'd

RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-13 Thread Larry Isaacs
> Another problem is to have them bundled correctly in the src > distribution, or we need 2 distributions ( win32 and *nix) or someone > will complaint , if the dist is done in win32 , *nix people > will scream > , if reversed the other :).. > In the Tomcat 3.3 releases ".zip" files will contai

Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
I don't think they ever got back-ported to 3.2.x, but I don't know for sure. The files include: mod_jk.c[R1.9],jk_ajp13_worker.c[R1.8]. You'll have to hunt down Mike Anderson for the details. I just remember the commits. - Original Message - From: "Larry Isaacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-PLAN-3.3

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
At least with isTomcatAuth="false" and mod_ssl configured properly, 274 should work now. I don't have a system configured to be able to test it (e.g. no user certs), but mod_ssl will set REMOTE_USER to the CN, and Ajp13 will allocate a SimplePrincipal to match the REMOTE_USER. - Original Mess

[Bug 3589] - Cannot process Taglib TLD when deployed through EmbeddedManager MBean

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3589 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-09-13 14:31 --- Can I build the full package from the jBoss tree ? I assume the problem is with the Embedded deployment scenario, but I would have assumed we would have had th

IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Andy Armstrong
Hi Gal, Developers, I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0, and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on this? Want me to take a look? Bye. -- Andy Armstrong, Tagish

Re: Tomcat4-RC1: parse exception on taglibs

2001-09-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Rickard Öberg wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:40:35 +0200 > From: Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Tomcat4-RC1: parse exception on taglibs > > Hey > > I've finally managed to get Cata

[Bug 3581] - Ctx() : Error creating validation mark - java.io.FileNotFoundException

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Andy Armstrong
Andy Armstrong wrote: > > Hi Gal, Developers, > > I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0, > and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on this? Want > me to take a look? (Sorry to follow myself up) Off-list I've had it explained to me that jk is

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"Andy Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Gal, Developers, > > I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0, > and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on this? Want > me to take a look? No, I'm not yet working on those. I'm actually concentrat

[Bug 3594] New: - Have to reload page or page will not be shown

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3594 Summary: Have to reload page or page will not be shown Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0 Release Candidate 1 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug 3577] - NPE when DecodeInterceptor gets confused

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3577 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Andy Armstrong
Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > "Andy Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Gal, Developers, > > > > I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0, > > and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on this? Want > > me to take a look? > > No, I'm not yet

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi to all, > > I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java, > and didn't find reference to SSL informations > forwarded from WebServer. > > Should it be fixed before release since it > may break the spec ? > > I could grab code from mod_jk to support >

Re: mod_jk using warp protocol ?

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about adding warp protocol to mod_jk and > may be adding with functionnalities from ajp14 ? I'm more than +1 about a merger between AJPv14 and WARP... The protocols are pretty similar... > Of course in J-T-C, since mod_jk in J-T must be freezed.

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"Andy Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andy Armstrong wrote: >> >> Hi Gal, Developers, >> >> I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0, >> and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on this? Want >> me to take a look? > > (Sorry to follow mys

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread cmanolache
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > Regarding a long-term plan, I heard Costin and Henri talking about > refactorying the JK connector APIs, and using APR, but that actually nothing > is ready yet (correct me if I'm wrong)... > My alleged thought right now goes to a big input in terms o

[PATCH] Missing jar in jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/build.xml

2001-09-13 Thread Patrick Luby
Hello, Can the attached patch to the jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/build.xml file be committed? The attached patch adds ${jndi.jar} to the CLASSPATH. Without this patch, the build of the catalina directory will fail. Thanks, Patrick -- __

Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
Re. 7) Since there is only one facade per Request and only one Request per thread, you could avoid synchronized all together by having an instance of SimpleDateFormat in either the Request or the facade. That would just leave ServerCookie using DateTool, where the hit would be minimal. Just me $

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"Andy Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: >> >> "Andy Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Gal, Developers, >>> >>> I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0, >>> and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on thi

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My view: > > It should happen only after 3.3 (and 4.0) is released, switching to APR is > reasonably easy ( IMHO ), adding warp protocol is doable ( but require > some changes in the request representation to use the same struct as the other > jk

Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-13 Thread cmanolache
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Bill Barker wrote: > Re. 7) Since there is only one facade per Request and only one Request per > thread, you could avoid synchronized all together by having an instance of > SimpleDateFormat in either the Request or the facade. That would just leave > ServerCookie using Dat

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread cmanolache
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > At the same time, since also JK is moving towards APR, but they're far > behind what WebApp does ATM, let's try to refine/update/change the WebApp > API, already based on APR, and work on it as the APR based connector, when > that is ready, we can thin

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread cmanolache
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > Anyway, switching to APR is not that easy (IMO), if you want to take > advantage of ALL which is provided by APR (I'm deprecating ANSI-C here). This is an incremental process, and can only increase the stability of jk. > > Refactoring/cleaning of jk

[Bug 3594] - Have to reload page or page will not be shown

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3594 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-09-13 17:21 --- If you have a reproducible test case that demonstrates this problem, please add it as an attachment to this bug report. Otherwise, there is nothing we can do wi

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina build.xml

2001-09-13 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/09/13 17:22:31 Modified:catalina build.xml Log: Add "jndi.jar" to the compile and test classpaths, so that compiles will not fail on JDK 1.2 systems (where the JNDI classes are not integrated). Submitted by: Patrick Luby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Revision Changes

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina build.xml

2001-09-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:23:56 -0500 > From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina build.xml > > "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > > > On 13 Sep 2

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/java WarpRequestHandler.java

2001-09-13 Thread pier
pier01/09/13 18:04:19 Modified:webapp/java WarpRequestHandler.java Log: Fix for bug #3574. Thanks to Fred Romelfanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +26 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/java/WarpRequestHandler.java Index: WarpRequestH

[PATCH] jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/bin/catalina.sh

2001-09-13 Thread Patrick Luby
Hello, Attached is a patch to the jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/bin/catalina.sh file. This patch eliminates the use of the "pushd" and "popd" shell commands when running this script with the "debug" argument. This patch is necessary because "pushd" and "popd" are only built-in commands in the

TC 3.3: Bug in AccessLogInterceptor

2001-09-13 Thread Bojan Smojver
Just for the fun of it, I've tried to enable AccessLogInterceptor (all defaults) in server.xml, but it actually causes NullPointerException in line 199. Line 199 is: -- fw.write(request.remoteHost().toString());

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> At the same time, since also JK is moving towards APR, but they're far >> behind what WebApp does ATM, let's try to refine/update/change the WebApp >> API, already based on APR, and work on it as the

Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> Anyway, switching to APR is not that easy (IMO), if you want to take >> advantage of ALL which is provided by APR (I'm deprecating ANSI-C here). > > This is an incremental process, and can only incr

[Bug 3597] New: - Shutting down takes *ages*

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3597 Summary: Shutting down takes *ages* Product: Tomcat 4 Version: Nightly Build Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: Other

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/support aplocal.m4

2001-09-13 Thread pier
pier01/09/13 18:26:19 Modified:webapp/support aplocal.m4 Log: Added directory resolution script. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +10 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/support/aplocal.m4 Index: aplocal.m4 ===

Log4J ?

2001-09-13 Thread Kenny Ma
Can anyone tell me how to use Log4J ? the sample is cat.debug("Hello world."); cat.info("What a beatiful day."); so, what is the different if i use System.err.println("Hello world."); ??? Both are output to standout... How to use Log4J more easy ? Thanks /* Kenny Ma [EMAIL PROTECT

[Bug 111] - after httpd reload mod_jk fails to find a worker BugRat Report#118

2001-09-13 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina build.xml

2001-09-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 20:33:02 -0500 > From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina build.xml > > Craig, > > I have no problem with the binary dis

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp configure.in

2001-09-13 Thread pier
pier01/09/13 19:36:02 Modified:webapp configure.in Log: Updated autoconf script to build without libtool and with APXS. Revision ChangesPath 1.29 +131 -250 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/configure.in Index: configure.in ==

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina build.xml

2001-09-13 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds like a vote is in order, then. > > My thinking for the current approach is as follows: > > * If a JAR file is included in the official binary distribution of Tomcat, > it needs to be put there by the standard build script. Otherwise, yo

[PATCH] manager-howto error

2001-09-13 Thread Jeff Turner
Hi, In the manager app howto: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/manager-howto.html The example for section "Deploy A New Application" is wrong. The following: http://localhost:8080/manager/install?path=/bar&war=file:/path/to/bar.war ought to be: http://localhost:8080/manager/in

  1   2   >