cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/apache2.0 Makefile.linux mod_jk.c

2001-02-09 Thread hgomez
hgomez 01/02/09 00:48:42 Modified:src/native/mod_jk/apache2.0 Makefile.linux mod_jk.c Log: mod_jk.c adapted to the lastest Apache 2.0 API Enjoy ! Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +25 -26jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/apache2.0/Makefile.linux Index: Makefile.l

TEI to get info from a outer tag

2001-02-09 Thread Tim Squires
Hi, I have the following tags in my taglib: do something with results e.g. <%=parent.getId()%> The parent goes off and gets a collection of bean's that the generic results tag iterates round. The parent tag name is the same as the bean name t

mod_jk TC 3.2.2 != TC 3.3 => was RE: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 3.2.2 Release Plan

2001-02-09 Thread GOMEZ Henri
While looking updating TC 3.2.2 with mod_jk for Apache 2.0 I notice that mod_jk from TC 3.2.2 and 3.3 are still differents I attached a list of diff without the version which are also different in each files. I propose that the whole TC 3.3 mod_jk native code (ap1.3, ap2.0 and common) are reimpo

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core Constants.java

2001-02-09 Thread Keith Wannamaker
|it is appropriate for bugs to be reported against 3.2.1. or NIGHTLY. Unfortunately, only the installer will know which is appropriate. Anybody else will misfile the bug. Given some of the bug reports I've seen, even the installer may misfile the bug. Standard Apache practice is to bump the sub

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core Constants.java

2001-02-09 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I didn't see the thread immediatly. I tagged constants like to show that's no more 3.2.1. You could change in 3.2.2-beta or better 3.2.2-dev (à la Apache httpd) but the name must be changed to show that's it's a new version La prise de conscience de votre propre ignorance est un grand pas vers

Tomcat 3.3 Milestone 1 Status

2001-02-09 Thread Larry Isaacs
Hi All, The TC3.3 release plan called for a Milestone 1 freeze yesterday (2/2/2001). However, some important changes were needed and I haven't finished my review of the documentation, so this has been delayed. I plan to finish my review of the documentation today. Then after a good nights sleep,

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/tests/webpages/WEB-INF test-tomcat.xml

2001-02-09 Thread costin
costin 01/02/09 09:02:03 Modified:src/tests/webpages/WEB-INF test-tomcat.xml Log: Ops, the updated file was in build and didn't got commited ( thanks to nightly build for finding that :-) Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +28 -22jakarta-tomcat/src/tests/webpages/WEB-

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/etc server1.xml

2001-02-09 Thread costin
costin 01/02/09 09:05:02 Added: src/etc server1.xml Log: Server.xml, with the simplified syntax ( old

Porting mod_webapp to APACHE 2.0 (At least trying)

2001-02-09 Thread jean-frederic clere
Hi, I have started to port mod_webapp to APACHE 2.0, I reached the following: +++ Module Name: mod_webapp.c Content handlers: (code broken) Configuration Phase Participation: none Module Directives: WebAppConnection - [optional parameter] WebAppMount - Current Configuration:

class LDADRealm

2001-02-09 Thread vganora
Hello, First an apology: Sorry, I know the right way to submit code is through the CVS Repository, but I really just wanted to give this one useful class to the project (if you want it.) Anyway, I wrote it, I documented it pretty well, I thought it might be useful to others, it may need to be tw

Session-expiry bug? getLastAccessedTime

2001-02-09 Thread Murthy Gorty
Hi, I noticed a problem with session timeouts in Tomcat3.2.1 The background thread that recycles sessions based on timeouts uses Session.getLastAccessedTime(). The session object itself has two variables lastAccessedTime and thisAccessedTime. - public

Re: Tomcat 3.3 Milestone 1 Status

2001-02-09 Thread cmanolache
Hi Larry, What about doing that after weekend ? Let's say is superstition, but so far Monday has been a good day for milestones. > Though not completely frozen, only simple (i.e. safe) bug fixes should > be made at this point. If there is something bigger that you think > should be in TC3.3m1

RE: Tomcat 3.3 Milestone 1 Status

2001-02-09 Thread Larry Isaacs
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 2:05 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3 Milestone 1 Status > > > Hi Larry, > > What about doing that after weekend ? Let's say is superstition, but > so far M

Re: Tomcat 4 status

2001-02-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Glenn Nielsen wrote: > I was wondering what the status of getting Tomcat 4 ready for its next > beta release currently is. I have finished implementing the Java SecurityManager > and the changes to jasper class loading. I know we took a step back to make a few > architectural changes. Are those

Re: [PATCH]: Bugrat report 723 ( unescaping/unencoding URLs ) was 'Re: 3.2.2 Release?'

2001-02-09 Thread David Weinrich
Just checking back on the status of this patch, I received some email from someone who isn't actively on the list but has the same problem as originally reported in Bugrat report 723. Anyone have any feedback on the patch or the control characters in URL question I had? David Weinrich - Orig

Re: [PATCH]: Bugrat report 723 ( unescaping/unencoding URLs ) was'Re: 3.2.2 Release?'

2001-02-09 Thread cmanolache
> Just checking back on the status of this patch, I received some email from > someone who isn't actively on the list but has the same problem as > originally reported in Bugrat report 723. Anyone have any feedback on the > patch or the control characters in URL question I had? I will work on it

[PATCH] encryption support in SimpleRealm.java

2001-02-09 Thread Mathias Herberts
Hi, I've been playing around with Tomcat 3.2.1 as we have several production servers using it and was concerned by the way the passwords were stored in tomcat-users.xml. The included patch modifies SimplesRealm.java (org.apache.tomcat.request.SimpleRealm) so it can correctly manage a tomcat-user

Re: [PATCH] encryption support in SimpleRealm.java

2001-02-09 Thread cmanolache
Hi Mathias, Your patch is interesting and is resolving a clear problem. On the other side, I would propose you create another module ( let's say CryptedRealm ? ). SimpleRealm should remain "simple". What's missing is the ability to store the passwords ( how do you plan to encrypt ? a passwd too

BodyContentImpl optimization

2001-02-09 Thread Casey Lucas
Hopefully this is the right place for the following information. If not, I'm sorry. I don't really do active development on tomcat (cvs updates, etc) but while profiling our application, I noticed a couple of minor improvements that could be made to BodyContentImpl.java. Specifically, in 'reAl

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core Constants.java

2001-02-09 Thread marcsaeg
marcsaeg01/02/09 15:05:47 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core Tag: tomcat_32 Constants.java Log: Changing TOMCAT_VERSION to 3.2.2-dev Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.22.2.10

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/webpages index.html

2001-02-09 Thread marcsaeg
marcsaeg01/02/09 15:06:27 Modified:src/webpages Tag: tomcat_32 index.html Log: Changing version to 3.2.2-dev Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.13.2.10 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat/src/webpages/index.html

[PATCH] TC4: TomcatBlock on Avalon 3.1a1: Part 1

2001-02-09 Thread Jason Brittain
Hi guys. I've just finished a bunch of changes to make Tomcat 4 (Catalina and Jasper) work on top of Avalon 3.1a1. Remy: Thanks for CatalinaBlock -- it served as a good starting point! What I've done is made the necessary modifications to make Tomcat 4 build as a single Avalon .bar (Block ARch

[PATCH] TC4: TomcatBlock on Avalon 3.1a1: Part 2

2001-02-09 Thread Jason Brittain
Attached are the diffs to the files that I modified to make TomcatBlock (Tomcat 4 running on Avalon 3.1a1). Explanation: build.xml (the top-level build.xml file) I moved the dist-opt-avalon target (and associated stuff) to this file since to build the bar file it needs to copy stuff from Cata

[PATCH] TC4: TomcatBlock on Avalon 3.1a1: Part 2 (for real this time)

2001-02-09 Thread Jason Brittain
Last time I forgot to attach the diffs! Sorry.. This mail has them. Attached are the diffs to the files that I modified to make TomcatBlock (Tomcat 4 running on Avalon 3.1a1). Explanation: build.xml (the top-level build.xml file) I moved the dist-opt-avalon target (and associated stuff)

[PATCH] TC4: TomcatBlock on Avalon 3.1a1: Part 3

2001-02-09 Thread Jason Brittain
Attached are the files I added to make TomcatBlock (Tomcat 4 running on Avalon 3.1a1): catalina/src/conf/avalon-MANIFEST.MF This manifest file is used to create tomcat-4.0.bar. Avalon needs a special manifest to know which Block is contained in the BAR file. catalina/src/conf/avalon-server.xm

RE: Porting mod_webapp to APACHE 2.0 (At least trying)

2001-02-09 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Nice to see that we could have Apache 2.0 with mod_webapp. La prise de conscience de votre propre ignorance est un grand pas vers la connaissance. -- Benjamin Disraeli >-Original Message- >From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 5:19 PM >To

jspDestroy() seems broken

2001-02-09 Thread Jason Novotny
When using Tomcat 3.1 I had an initialization page that made use of the jspInit() and jspDestroy() methods to initialize and destroy a server pool like the following: <%! static public Pool pool = null; <%! public void jspInit() { System.out.println("JSP init"); pool = Pool.ge

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat Jdk11Compat.java

2001-02-09 Thread nacho
nacho 01/02/09 16:55:37 Modified:.build.xml src/admin/test test.jsp src/share/org/apache/tomcat/startup Main.java src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat Jdk11Compat.java Log: * build was a little messed last time, fixing it a l

Re: Porting mod_webapp to APACHE 2.0 (At least trying)

2001-02-09 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have started to port mod_webapp to APACHE 2.0, I reached the > following: > +++ > Module Name: mod_webapp.c > Content handlers: (code broken) > Configuration Phase Participation: none > Module Directives: > WebAppConnection - [optio

Re: Thread-safety

2001-02-09 Thread Brian Goetz
> > This statement is true, but very easy to misinterpret; be careful. > > You can't use this to make an end-run around the problem in the > > general case. If jspx_init() creates any objects, you've gotta > > synchronize, plain and simple. If jspx_init() calculates > > multiple primitive value

Re: Tomcat 4 status

2001-02-09 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [..] Other than that, there is only one API change I want to include before > beta 2 -- extended lifecycle support for the Connector interface that will > allow us to ultimately support Tomcat standalone on port 80 through the use of > a platform

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat SimpleClassLoader.java Jdk11Compat.java

2001-02-09 Thread costin
costin 01/02/10 00:12:42 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/startup Main.java src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat Jdk11Compat.java Added: src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat SimpleClassLoader.java Removed: src/share/org/apa