RE: ENCTYPE="multipart/form-data"

what does your tag (in HTML) look like? -Original Message- From: Falcon cheetah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27. nóvember 2000 07:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ENCTYPE="multipart/form-data" I am trying to load a file to my server, in order to use it as an attachment for a Java

Servlet Mapping

Hi I have several servlets which have been developed using a Apache JServe setup. I'm moving over to Tomcat with Apache and which to use the packaged servets that I already have. My problem is as follows: The servlet: /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/classes/IsItWorkingServlet works fine

Problem compiling T3 beta 8.

Hi All,   I downloaded the Tomcat 3.2 b8 source and when I try to compile the same, I got the following error message.   What could be the problem.  Is it my mistake or a bug (probably) fixed already?   Thanks,   Hari.     ==[ ERROR MESSAGE RECD ON COMPILING ]=

Dispatcher Question

I'm experiencing some differences in the behaviour of Tomcat vs Websphere and IAS. Assuming that I have a web application called test. Inside the code of a servlet in the web application, I perform the following - RequestDispa

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/service/src/share Makefile

pier00/11/27 03:05:25 Modified:service/src/native jsvc.h jsvc_help.c jsvc_parse.c jsvc_service.c jsvc_unix.c Added: service/src Makefile service/src/native Makefile service/src/share Makefile Log: Major update Re

Re: Problem compiling T3 beta 8.

Hari wrote: Hi All, I downloaded the Tomcat 3.2 b8 source and when I try to compile the same, I got the following error message. What could be the problem.  Is it my mistake or a bug (probably) fixed already?   Thanks, Hari. Check your classpath -- you probably have an incorrect version of serv

Re: Dispatcher Question

Lee Yeow Leong wrote: > I'm experiencing some differences in the behaviour of Tomcat vs > Websphere and IAS. > > Assuming that I have a web application called test. Inside the code > of a servlet in the web application, I perform the following > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5

> * The servlet container code in 3.2 is *substantially* better > than the servlet container code in 3.1 in terms of spec conformance, > number of bugs, functionality, and performance. Thanks. But wait to see 3.3, it'll have quite a few nice surprises :-) > For any other scenario, you owe i

RE: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5

> Whaoo, Tomcat 4.1. Allready ? > But what about support for Tomcat 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3 (bug fixes) > > It seems clear for you that Tomcat 3.2 (and the full 3.x line) > are allready products in end of life. I don't know how you reached that conclusion, but I'm sure it's wrong - tomcat 3.x

Re: [PATCH] WOOPS (Was RE: EmbededTomcat.java requires jsse)

> Well... that's what you get when you let bozos like me mess with your > code ;o) No problem, we are very happy to see people messing with tomcat ! Costin

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/service/src Makedefs.orig

pier00/11/27 03:06:18 Added: service/src Makedefs.orig Log: Added makedefs.orig Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/service/src/Makedefs.orig Index: Makedefs.orig ===

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/connectors/src/webapplib Makefile wa_callback.c wa_callback.h wa.h wa_host.c wa_provider_info.c

pier00/11/27 04:48:18 Modified:connectors/src/webapplib wa.h wa_host.c wa_provider_info.c Added: connectors/src/webapplib Makefile wa_callback.c wa_callback.h Log: Better specification of callback information Revision ChangesPath 1.3

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/connectors/src/apache-1.3 mod_webapp.c

pier00/11/27 04:50:12 Modified:connectors/src/apache-1.3 mod_webapp.c Added: connectors/src Makedefs.orig Log: Fixed header handling Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/connectors/src/Makedefs.orig Index: Makedefs.orig

mapping servlet to the root of the site?

Hi! I'm trying to map a servlet to serve the root of a site (plain http://myserver.com without any slashes or anything). I managed to do that using Resin, but I haven't figured out a way yet how to do it with Tomcat (beta 8). The configuration files don't contain anything on this, neither does t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5

A few short comments intermixed below. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [snip] > Many of the ajp13 bugs seems to be fixed (even the dreaded ajp13 + > RequestDispatcher). > That's great! Even if you don't get them fixed in time for 3.2 final, rolling out a maintenance release with those fixes would b

RE: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5

> > It seems clear for you that Tomcat 3.2 (and the full 3.x line) > > are allready products in end of life. > > I don't know how you reached that conclusion, but I'm sure it's wrong - > tomcat 3.x is far from over :-) I just noticed that many of tomcat developers seems to focus only on TC 3.2

[Tomcat 4.0] SOLARIS-isms and other problems in native code

I'm trying to build the new native code stuff on my Linux box, and am running into the following SOLARIS-specific issues: service/src/native/jsvc.h - The header file is SOLARIS specific service/src/native/jsvc_unix.c - The sysinfo() system call, defined in is SOLARIS specific connectors/sr

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/connector/src/webapplib wa.c wa.h wa_connection.c wa_connection.h wa_host.c wa_host.h wa_provider.c wa_provider.h wa_provider_info.c wa_request.c wa_request.h

> I would rather wait and include the connector stuff in the m5 milestone > -- that > way it will get more attention (and bug fixes :-). > > Also, I don't see any makefiles or other build scripts for the web > connector, or > for the invocation stuff. I'd be happy to integrate whatever is > nece

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5

> > Your planning is to release TC 4.0 for late December or early January > ?-) > > What about Tomcat 3.2 release ? early December ? > > > > There have been several bug fixes posted for 3.2b8 that I want to > evaluate, but > no new critical bugs. Therefore, my inclination will be to cut a final

Now, am I stupid or what?

Ok, I don't know what's happening... I'm reading some of the messages to this list "in advance" (since I moderate and NOT all of you kids post with the same email address you are subscribed! GRRR!)... But, strangely enough, I've seen some messages talking about the connector this morning that I d

Re: mapping servlet to the root of the site?

I may be wrong, but this isn't really the right list of these kinds of questions... please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] that don't concern the development of Tomcat.. To answer your question though, section 10 of servlet 2.2 specifications talks about how to map requests to servlet. To map the whole si

Servlet Engine performance comparison

Hi all,   I’m looking for a paper comparing different servlet engine from various perspective, especially performance. (I would like 2 c tomcat there). Does anyone know something I should look on?   How is tomcat performance compared to other leading open-source or commercial servlet e

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5

Gomez Henri wrote: > [snip] > I know it's an open source project and everyone can contribute but there will > be 2 concurrents projects at Apache. May be not a good thing but will help give > a substantial emulation between 3.3 and 4.0 teams. 4.0 appears to be a Sun > Project (most of the active

Re: Now, am I stupid or what?

"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote: > Ok, I don't know what's happening... I'm reading some of the messages to > this list "in advance" (since I moderate and NOT all of you kids post > with the same email address you are subscribed! GRRR!)... > > But, strangely enough, I've seen some messages talking abou

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/appdev/sample build.bat build.sh

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > craigmcc00/11/27 14:46:08 > > Modified:src/doc/appdev Tag: tomcat_32 source.html >src/doc/appdev/sample Tag: tomcat_32 build.bat build.sh > Log: > Update the Application Developer's Guide and sample scripts to by default > include the JAX

Recent Tomcat Download Stats

Presumably when 3.2 goes final, there will be a surge. Also, 4.0-m5 (this weekend or so) will be the first Tomcat 4.0 "milestone" (alpha) that has the connectors to run with Apache. "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > PS: Tomcat 4.0-m4 just went over 10,000 downloads of the binary distribution > (s

Re: [Tomcat 4.0] SOLARIS-isms and other problems in native code

Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm trying to build the new native code stuff on my Linux box, and am running > into the following SOLARIS-specific issues: > > service/src/native/jsvc.h > - The header file is SOLARIS specific > > service/src/native/jsvc_unix.c > - The sysinf

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/connector/src/webapplib wa.cwa.h wa_connection.c wa_connection.h wa_host.c wa_host.h wa_provider.c wa_provider.h wa_provider_info.c wa_request.c wa_request.h

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would rather wait and include the connector stuff in the m5 milestone >> -- that >> way it will get more attention (and bug fixes :-). >> >> Also, I don't see any makefiles or other build scripts for the web >> connector, or >> for the invocation

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From my end user (production) point of vue, I need the fastest servlet-engine > with a robust WEB Server (Apache) connector. Like many I select ApacheJServ > and next TC 3.x because there was mod_jserv (load-balancing and > fault-tolerance). If yo

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/connector/src/webapplib wa.cwa.h wa_connection.c wa_connection.h wa_host.c wa_host.h wa_provider.c wa_provider.h wa_provider_info.c wa_request.c wa_request.h

Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would rather wait and include the connector stuff in the m5 milestone -- > that way it will get more attention (and bug fixes :-). I would love it too... But I can't hold off your release cycles... If it's not there it's only my fault... > Al

Re: Now, am I stupid or what?

Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is a message (from me) about the connector that *I* wanted you to read > :-). It documents a couple of SOLARIS-isms that we probably need to fix, and > the fact that I don't have complete docs for installing mod_webapp so that I > can test

Re: Now, am I stupid or what?

on 11/27/2000 3:38 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the former topic, we probably need someone who is autoconf-savvy to make > our > build procedures for native code reasonably platform independent. Any > volunteers? (Hint) There is TONS of helpful and perfectly good wo

[VOTE] Tomcat 3.2 Final Release (!) and Ongoing Maintenance Plan

Dear TOMCAT-DEV folks, Well, it appears that we successfully licked a large number of the problems with 3.2-beta-8, without introducing any serious new regressions. Therefore, I'd like to ask that we vote on the following three propositions: (1) Build and release Tomcat 3.2 final on Wednesday

Re: Recent Tomcat Download Stats

Louis Tribble wrote: > > Presumably when 3.2 goes final, there will be a surge. > > Also, 4.0-m5 (this weekend or so) will be the first Tomcat 4.0 > "milestone" (alpha) that has the connectors to run with Apache. > > "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > PS: Tomcat 4.0-m4 just went over 10,000 down

Re: Recent Tomcat Download Stats

Louis Tribble wrote: > Presumably when 3.2 goes final, there will be a surge. > That seems somewhat likely to me :-) > > Also, 4.0-m5 (this weekend or so) will be the first Tomcat 4.0 > "milestone" (alpha) that has the connectors to run with Apache. > Hmm, we might want to see about adding som

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 3.2 Final Release (!) and Ongoing Maintenance Plan

"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > Dear TOMCAT-DEV folks, > > Well, it appears that we successfully licked a large number of the problems with > 3.2-beta-8, without introducing any serious new regressions. Therefore, I'd > like to ask that we vote on the following three propositions: > > (1) Bui

Re: Recent Tomcat Download Stats

Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm, we might want to see about adding some alternate download sites, at least > for a while. Anyone got a little space on a server with good Internet > connectivity we might be able to utilize? Please contact me privately for > detailed discus

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 3.2 Final Release (!) and Ongoing Maintenance Plan

> Dear TOMCAT-DEV folks, > > Well, it appears that we successfully licked a large number of the problems with > 3.2-beta-8, without introducing any serious new regressions. Therefore, I'd > like to ask that we vote on the following three propositions: > > > (1) Build and release Tomcat 3.2 final

[Tomcat 4.0] Pain building...

AAARRRGGGHHH I can't build Tomcat 4.0... Can we fix the build before the next milestone gets out? It's 3 hours that me and Fede are bashing our heads against it and GRRR :) Pier -- Pier P. Fumagalli Apache Software Foundation

Re: [Tomcat 4.0] Pain building...

> > AAARRRGGGHHH I can't build Tomcat 4.0... Can we fix the build before the > next milestone gets out? It's 3 hours that me and Fede are bashing our > heads against it and GRRR :) > Can you send the compilation errors you get ? Perhaps it's just yet another conditional compilation pr

Re: [Tomcat 4.0] Pain building...

Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > > AAARRRGGGHHH I can't build Tomcat 4.0... Can we fix the build before the > > next milestone gets out? It's 3 hours that me and Fede are bashing our > > heads against it and GRRR :) > > > > Can you send the compilation errors you get ? Perhaps it's just ye

Re: [Tomcat 4.0] Pain building...

> Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > > > > > AAARRRGGGHHH I can't build Tomcat 4.0... Can we fix the build before the > > > next milestone gets out? It's 3 hours that me and Fede are bashing our > > > heads against it and GRRR :) > > > > > > > Can you send the compilation errors you get ? Per

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/appdev/sample build.bat build.sh

craigmcc00/11/27 14:46:08 Modified:src/doc/appdev Tag: tomcat_32 source.html src/doc/appdev/sample Tag: tomcat_32 build.bat build.sh Log: Update the Application Developer's Guide and sample scripts to by default include the JAXP parser classes on the compiler classp

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/doc readme

craigmcc00/11/27 14:48:03 Modified:src/doc Tag: tomcat_32 readme Log: Document two known issues in 3.2b8 that will not be resolved before final release. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.8.2.7 +29 -1

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/doc readme

craigmcc00/11/27 15:36:49 Modified:src/doc Tag: tomcat_32 readme Log: Document the fact that a particular misconfiguration of Tomcat can cause a CPU-bound loop to occur. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/startup Tomcat.java

craigmcc00/11/27 16:19:23 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/resources Tag: tomcat_32 LocalStrings.properties src/share/org/apache/tomcat/startup Tag: tomcat_32 Tomcat.java Log: Improve the usage comments of the Tomcat

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 3.2 Final Release (!) and Ongoing Maintenance Plan

- Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Well, it appears that we successfully licked a large number of the problems with > 3.2-beta-8, without introducing any serious new regressions. Therefore, I'd > like to ask that we vote on the following three propositi

Re: [Tomcat 4.0] Pain building...

See below. Remy Maucherat wrote: > > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > > > > > > > > AAARRRGGGHHH I can't build Tomcat 4.0... Can we fix the build before > the > > > > next milestone gets out? It's 3 hours that me and Fede are bashing > our > > > > heads against it and GRRR :) > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 3.2 Final Release (!) and Ongoing Maintenance Plan

(1) +1 (2) +1 (3) +1 Hari. - Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 6:30 AM Subject: [VOTE] Tomcat 3.2 Final Release (!) and Ongoing Maintenance Plan > Dear TOMCAT-DEV folks, > > Well, it appears that

Re: Problem compiling T3 beta 8.

Thanks Craig, It works fine now.   Thanks again.   Hari.   - Original Message - From: Craig R. McClanahan To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 11:51 PM Subject: Re: Problem compiling T3 beta 8. Hari wrote: Hi All, I downloaded the

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/factory ResourceFactory.java TransactionFactory.java

remm00/11/27 21:42:17 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/factory ResourceFactory.java TransactionFactory.java Log: - Neither ResourceFactory nor TransactionFactory contain a reference to Tyrex factories anymore, so hopefully the conditional

Gatekeeper for TOMCAT. Where/Who is????

Hi all, I am not so conversant with the admin aspects of TOMCAT. Is there a direct way to instruct TOMCAT to shut-down any client request/communications when some adverse conditions are detectd on the server. Something like a java app that handles requests from clients is too busy or ran out