Re: xsl by extension

2001-09-06 Thread Christopher Cain
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [snip] > So I'll be as -1 on adding this feature > ( or CGI support, for this matter :-) Damn! There goes my very next proposal =) - Christopher /** * Pleurez, pleurez, mes yeux, et fondez vous en eau! * La moitié de ma vie a mis l'autre au tombeau. *---Corne

Re: xsl by extension

2001-09-06 Thread cmanolache
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > Of course none of this is portable across servlet containers, but we seem to > easily forget about that :) Being Tomcat the Reference Implementation, as an > ASF member, and Servlet JSR member, I'll never stop stressing out that IMNSO > relying on conta

Re: xsl by extension

2001-09-06 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another ( and better ) solution - extend JspInterceptor ( well, the code > needs some cleanup - again I would recomend you do that in j34 workspace > ). > > Then you can add the dependencies and avoid any overhead - your XSP pages > will run as fa

Re: xsl by extension

2001-09-06 Thread cmanolache
Another ( and better ) solution - extend JspInterceptor ( well, the code needs some cleanup - again I would recomend you do that in j34 workspace ). Then you can add the dependencies and avoid any overhead - your XSP pages will run as fast as a servlet, without any extra dispatching or intermedia

Re: xsl by extension

2001-09-06 Thread cmanolache
> > Thanks, craig, but i'm working with version 3.3. ¿isn't any > > alternative avalaible? > > Nope ... if you map your extension to your servlet, you cannot also map it > to the JSP servlet. Of course there are alternative :-) The easiest - have your xsp generate 'plain' jsp files, and redirect

Re: xsl by extension

2001-09-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, javi . wrote: > Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 21:45:46 + > From: javi . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: xsl by extension > > Thanks, craig, but i'm working with version 3.3. ¿isn'

Re: xsl by extension

2001-09-06 Thread Jeff Turner
Ummm... perhaps invoke Jasper from your servlet? Class clazz = Class.forName("org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet"); HttpServlet jsp = (HttpServlet) clazz.newInstance(); jsp.init(context); jsp.service(request, response); That code is from Cocoon 2's JspGenerator, which uses Jasper to create XML

Re: xsl by extension

2001-09-06 Thread javi .
Thanks, craig, but i'm working with version 3.3. ¿isn't any alternative avalaible? it seems it should be a quite common problem... jv >From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re

Re: xsl by extension

2001-09-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: xsl by extension > > hello everybody!! > > i'm new here, and so excuse me if this thread has been > started (and closed) before. and xcuse me for my spelling ;) > my native language is

xsl by extension

2001-09-06 Thread javi .
hello everybody!! i'm new here, and so excuse me if this thread has been started (and closed) before. and xcuse me for my spelling ;) my native language is java. i'm trying to add to tomcat a nice feature of resin: automatically apply a xsl transformation over all files with .xtp extension (xml