"Arshad Mahmood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting idea to split the static content onto a different server.
>
> Does anyone know how a browser like IE handles this kind of situation, I
> know that with HTTP 1.1 the server will leave the connection open for
> further requests so that imag
ll have to put an SSL certificate
on the image server as well.
Regards.
- Original Message -
From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 2:00 AM
Subject: Re: webapp- who handles
Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cute... You can have some... Visit your local tobacconist.
> Anyhow, you'll see my reasoning when the article gets published. Few other
> folks having the same problems we do (very high loads + servlets) don't have
> the same problem as well It's ac
Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 4:04 PM
> Subject: Re: webapp- who han
- Original Message -
From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: webapp- who handles static content: Tomcat or Apache
> Sam Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sam Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read elsewhere that that mod_webapp fowarded
> requests for static resources to Tomcat (instead of
> Apache). Is this fixed? If not, are there workarounds?
It is forwarding requests, and it's definitely the last of my priorities to
"fix" (actually I don't
I read elsewhere that that mod_webapp fowarded
requests for static resources to Tomcat (instead of
Apache). Is this fixed? If not, are there workarounds?
Tx,
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com
--
