DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24774] - session timeout working only once

2004-06-23 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24774 session timeout working only once --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-23 21:38 --- PersistentManagerBase has already been patched (see Bug 23468). As for the reasoning, I am afraid I can't shed any light on th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24774] - session timeout working only once

2004-06-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24774 session timeout working only once --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 22:50 --- my suggestion would be to handle such situation in PersistentManagerBase.processExpires; so that even if custom implementat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24774] - session timeout working only once

2004-06-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24774 session timeout working only once [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20083] - Session timeout implementation requires 2 accesses per timeout.

2004-04-20 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083 Session timeout implementation requires 2 accesses per timeout. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26261] - Another session timeout problem (similar to 25234)

2004-01-19 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26261 Another session timeout problem (similar to 25234) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26261] New: - Another session timeout problem (similar to 25234)

2004-01-19 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26261 Another session timeout problem (similar to 25234) Summary: Another session timeout problem (similar to 25234) Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.16 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10656] - Session Timeout incorrect for 0 in web.xml

2004-01-01 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10656 Session Timeout incorrect for 0 in web.xml [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PRO

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11745] - web.xml session-timeout value of 0 does not work as specified.

2004-01-01 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11745 web.xml session-timeout value of 0 does not work as specified. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25792] - Session timeout implemented incorrectly

2003-12-31 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25792 Session timeout implemented incorrectly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25792] - Session timeout implemented incorrectly

2003-12-30 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25792 Session timeout implemented incorrectly --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-30 14:29 --- The session timeout in Tomcat seems to be implemented in a way that doesn't take the background clean-up thread into account. StandardSession has tw

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25792] - Session timeout implemented incorrectly

2003-12-29 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25792 Session timeout implemented incorrectly --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-29 10:32 --- Created an attachment (id=9725) webapp to reproduce the bug - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25792] New: - Session timeout implemented incorrectly

2003-12-29 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25792 Session timeout implemented incorrectly Summary: Session timeout implemented incorrectly Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.16 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: Major Pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10656] - Session Timeout incorrect for 0 in web.xml

2003-12-27 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10656 Session Timeout incorrect for 0 in web.xml [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24774] - session timeout working only once

2003-11-21 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24774 session timeout working only once --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-21 17:06 --- some additional information: sorry, i have forgot to mention what this SessionMonitor is: this is our custom object which implements HttpSessionBindingLi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24774] - session timeout working only once

2003-11-18 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24774 session timeout working only once --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-18 10:22 --- Created an attachment (id=9152) propsed patch - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24774] New: - session timeout working only once

2003-11-18 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24774 session timeout working only once Summary: session timeout working only once Product: Tomcat 4 Version: Nightly Build Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority:

[PATCH] StandardSession session timeout fix

2003-11-17 Thread Martin Hajduch
hi, i'm having this problem: 1. after x mins of inactivity, user session is invalidated (PersistentManagerBase.processExpires) 2. StandardSession.expire does setValid(false) and expiring=true at the beginning 3. then it calls StandardSession.removeAttribute -> SessionMonitor.valueUnbound -> Sta

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7613] - session timeout setting ignored/confusing to configure

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7613 session timeout setting ignored/confusing to configure [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7613] - session timeout setting ignored/confusing to configure

2002-08-28 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7613 session timeout setting ignored/confusing to configure --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-08-28 16:52 --- I updated the session manager's TC5 documentation to remove mentioning the maxInactiveInterval attribute (since setting it is pointle

session timeout

2002-08-27 Thread Bob Herrmann
is inherited - automatically if you specify a <session-timeout> -element in the web application deployment descriptor -(/WEB-INF/web.xml). - - -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11745] New: - web.xml session-timeout value of 0 does not work as specified.

2002-08-15 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11745 web.xml session-timeout value of 0 does not work as specified. Summary: web.xml session-timeout value of 0 does not work as specified. Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0.4 Final Platform: PC OS/Version: Wind

web-app_2_3.dtd and servlet spec and tomcat session-timeout expireat 0 problem.

2002-07-31 Thread James Cooley
Hi, This came up on the xdoclet-devel mailing list. The xdoclet implementation takes follows the dtd saying that a session expires if the session-timeout is =< 0, while the spec says it will never expire if session-timeout is -1, Tomcat says it will not expire if session-timeout is <

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10656] - Session Timeout incorrect for 0 in web.xml

2002-07-10 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10656 Session Timeout incorrect for 0 in web.xml --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-07-10 19:33 --- True, and page 222 of Servlet 2.3 says that Session.getMaxInactiveInterval() must return a negative to indicate that the session never times out

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10656] New: - Session Timeout incorrect for 0 in web.xml

2002-07-10 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10656 Session Timeout incorrect for 0 in web.xml Summary: Session Timeout incorrect for 0 in web.xml Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0.3 Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7613] - session timeout setting ignored/confusing to configure

2002-06-26 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7613 session timeout setting ignored/confusing to configure --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-06-27 04:19 --- Robert, what you say reflects the behavior that I've been seeing. If the ability to set the session timeout using a Context or Man

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7613] - session timeout setting ignored/confusing to configure

2002-06-26 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7613 session timeout setting ignored/confusing to configure --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-06-26 21:29 --- Verified in 4.1.5The only current way to set the session timeout is in the web.xml of the app, or modify the "system" web.x

session timeout bug ?

2002-06-10 Thread Oke, Larry
I'm experiencing exactly this problem as (the original message) below, can somebody please help. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Bourque) Subject: session timeout bug ? Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:48:37 -0400 Hi ! I've been searching everywhere for this problem and I just can&

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7613] New: - session timeout setting ignored/confusing to configure

2002-03-29 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7613 session timeout setting ignored/confusing to configure Summary: session timeout setting ignored/confusing to configure Product: Tomcat 4 Version: Nightly Build Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Statu

[t4] classloader bug on session timeout

2001-06-17 Thread Geoff Soutter
Hi there, I'm using the t4 I built checked out and built on Friday, and I noticed the following: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: at .valueUnbound(ServletSession.java:333) at org.apache.catalina.session.StandardSession.removeAttribute(StandardSession. java:953) at org.apa

RE: session timeout

2001-01-18 Thread Jayesh
I tried the first approach, it works great with 3.x. Thank you, Jayesh -Original Message- From: Kief Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 8:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: session timeout Jayesh typed the following on 08:00 AM 1/17/2001 -0800 &g

Re: session timeout

2001-01-17 Thread Kief Morris
Jayesh typed the following on 08:00 AM 1/17/2001 -0800 >I need to do some work when tomcat session gets timed out. Could anyone of >you suggest how I can do it. With servlet 2.2 (Tomcat 3.x) you should make sure one of the attributes you're adding to the session implements HttpSessionBindingListe

session timeout

2001-01-17 Thread Jayesh
Hi, I need to do some work when tomcat session gets timed out. Could anyone of you suggest how I can do it. Changing invalidate/expire method would be the last thing I like to do. Is there any other way (call back method??). Thanks, Jayesh