"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've recently setup a intranet site on an NT 4.0 box using Apache 1.3.23
> combined with Tomcat 4.0.3. To integrate them together I'm using the warp
> connector and the mod_webapp module...
Forget it... It doesn't work under Windows..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've recently setup a intranet site on an NT 4.0 box using Apache 1.3.23 combined
>with Tomcat 4.0.3. To integrate them together I'm using the warp connector and the
>mod_webapp module I found at
>http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/releas
Hi,
I've recently setup a intranet site on an NT 4.0 box using Apache 1.3.23 combined with
Tomcat 4.0.3. To integrate them together I'm using the warp connector and the
mod_webapp module I found at
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.1/bin/win32/webapp-module-1.0
-Original Message-
> >From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2001 17:41
> >To: Michael Steindl
> >Subject: Re: problem with mod_webapp on rh7.1
> >
> >
> >Recent versions from the "jakarta-tomcat-c
?
cu,
michael.
>-Original Message-
>From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2001 17:41
>To: Michael Steindl
>Subject: Re: problem with mod_webapp on rh7.1
>
>
>Recent versions from the "jakarta-tomcat-connectors" C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
> > Yes, but jk_open_socket would have to be modified:
> > 1 - to pass a apr_pool to allocate the apr_connect.
> > 2 - to return a status instead a socket.
>
> Sure, you can pass a jk_pool ( and make jk_log a field of
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Yes, but jk_open_socket would have to be modified:
> 1 - to pass a apr_pool to allocate the apr_connect.
> 2 - to return a status instead a socket.
Sure, you can pass a jk_pool ( and make jk_log a field of jk_pool, so
everything will work as befor
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> >> How could one write a wrapper for the following?:
> >> +++
> >> -int jk_open_socket(struct sockaddr_in *addr,
> >> +apr_status_t jk_open_socket(apr_socket_t **new,
> >apr_sockaddr_t *addr,
> >> int ndelay,
> >> - jk_logger_t *l)
> >>
>> How could one write a wrapper for the following?:
>> +++
>> -int jk_open_socket(struct sockaddr_in *addr,
>> +apr_status_t jk_open_socket(apr_socket_t **new,
>apr_sockaddr_t *addr,
>> int ndelay,
>> - jk_logger_t *l)
>> + jk_logger_t *l,
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> How could one write a wrapper for the following?:
> +++
> -int jk_open_socket(struct sockaddr_in *addr,
> +apr_status_t jk_open_socket(apr_socket_t **new, apr_sockaddr_t *addr,
> int ndelay,
> - jk_logger_t *l)
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 06:09:44PM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> > >Realistically though, APR is fairly stable API-wise. There *are*
> > >going to be some minor changes and tweaks along the way. But, they
> > >should all be for the better (like the util_date migration
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > What about working an APR wrapper ? ie something which wrap OS calls
> > to APR or native calls ? And make mod_jk call wrapper functions ?
>
> I think that defeats the purpose of APR. If APR isn't doing it right,
> then APR needs to be fixed. APR
> Hmm, I wonder if we should do a T&R with APR to give a "release"
> that is separate from httpd-2.0. I don't see any reason why we
> couldn't do this. I just have no clue how to do the T&R. My
> understanding is that anyone with commit privs can do that.
> I'll look into it though.
>
> BUT,
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 06:09:44PM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >Realistically though, APR is fairly stable API-wise. There *are*
> >going to be some minor changes and tweaks along the way. But, they
> >should all be for the better (like the util_date migration).
>
> I'm confident that APR is
>When I have commit access to APR, yeah, I do. =) (That change to the
>util_date.h is because of me - actually, I think that you should just
>assume that they have the latest build of Apache 2.0 if they are using
>Apache 2.0 - it is still "beta" and I use that term loosely...)
I added a #defin
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:29:39AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> APR will be the future, but it still in changing state.
> Do you want to works on a moving API ?
> We need a release and binary builds for majors OS
When I have commit access to APR, yeah, I do. =) (That change to the
util_dat
>One thing that mod_webapp has going for it is that it is based on APR
>(this makes the webapp code much simpler). In my experience with
>mod_jk, I've always had problems getting the right defines for my
>platform (as there is no configure script - somehow, I remember J.F.
>Clere adding some s
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 04:30:55PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> so is there still interest in a patch for the mod_webapp docs or has focus
> been shifted over to mod_jk?
I'd like to see a patch, but that's me. =) Pier probably can tell you
what he's doing with mod_webapp. I'm not a fan of mod_j
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, kevin seguin wrote:
> jeez... it's been a while since i've used ajp13 with tomcat 4 :)
>
> if memory serves... you want to add an ajp13 connector as a child of a
> service, e.g.:
>
>
> port="8009" acceptCount="10" debug="0"/>
thanks, that works like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, kevin seguin wrote:
>
> > yeah, i'd be interested in updating the ajp connector for tomcat 4 do
> > ajp14, if i could find the time ;-)
>
> That's the fun of doing open source...
>
heh heh :)
> > i'm not sure i see the benefit in making ajp13
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, kevin seguin wrote:
> yeah, i'd be interested in updating the ajp connector for tomcat 4 do
> ajp14, if i could find the time ;-)
That's the fun of doing open source...
> i'm not sure i see the benefit in making ajp13 support autoconfig --
> probably not worth the effort.
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Are you interested to update the connector to use Ajp14 ( in backward
> compat mode and/or ajp14 mode ) ? I think I found both short term and
> long term solutions for the config issue ( well, it seems mod_jk supports
> the same 'autoconfig' mode as mod_webapp - and it did tha
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:38:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please don't take this personally - I put some (free) time into
> this, and if I don't like your solution doesn't mean I consider you an
> "idiot" ( or that I'll not use the same solution, as it's considerably
> easier to impleme
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > well, it seems mod_jk supports
> > the same 'autoconfig' mode as mod_webapp - and it did that since the
> > beginning
>
> Sometimes I just wish to quit this whole shit and go working for Starbu
Donald Ball at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
>
>>> well, it seems mod_jk supports
>>> the same 'autoconfig' mode as mod_webapp - and it did that since the
>>> beginning
>>
>> Sometimes I just wish to quit this whole shit and go working for Starbucks
>>
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> > well, it seems mod_jk supports
> > the same 'autoconfig' mode as mod_webapp - and it did that since the
> > beginning
>
> Sometimes I just wish to quit this whole shit and go working for Starbucks
> (or Microsoft)... Thank you so much for pointing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> well, it seems mod_jk supports
> the same 'autoconfig' mode as mod_webapp - and it did that since the
> beginning
Sometimes I just wish to quit this whole shit and go working for Starbucks
(or Microsoft)... Thank you so much for pointing out what
Hi Kevin,
Are you interested to update the connector to use Ajp14 ( in backward
compat mode and/or ajp14 mode ) ? I think I found both short term and
long term solutions for the config issue ( well, it seems mod_jk supports
the same 'autoconfig' mode as mod_webapp - and it did that since the
beg
jeez... it's been a while since i've used ajp13 with tomcat 4 :)
if memory serves... you want to add an ajp13 connector as a child of a
service, e.g.:
...
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> >i tried putting a Host element underneath the Engine but it didn't like
> >that at all. i think
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >i tried putting a Host element underneath the Engine but it didn't like
> >that at all. i think this must be wrong since i'm trying to
> >associate an
> >Ajp13Connector with a WarpEngine. how should this be configured? sorry,
> >i've not been able to fin
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Donald Ball wrote:
> okay, i've got apache talking to tomcat, but i always get this message:
>
> Tomcat Error Report
>
> HTTP Status 500 - No Host matches server name foobar.webslingerZ.com
never mind, i fixed this problem. i have a new problem, but i started a
thread on tom
>i tried putting a Host element underneath the Engine but it didn't like
>that at all. i think this must be wrong since i'm trying to
>associate an
>Ajp13Connector with a WarpEngine. how should this be configured? sorry,
>i've not been able to find any docs for this configuration.
Hi Donald,
Yo
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > port="8009" acceptCount="10" debug="0"/>
> >
> > and i built mod_jk.so and put it in my libexec directory, but i don't know
> > how to configure mod_jk in apache's httpd.conf for tomcat-catalina. do you
> > have some configuration advi
jean-frederic clere at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Aaron Bannert wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 06:35:29PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
What if (random thoughts coming out now), instead of requiring people to
build APR (since that seems the biggest source of problems), we don't
Aaron Bannert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:42:53AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
>> Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:07:57PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions
Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 06:35:29PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > > What if (random thoughts coming out now), instead of requiring people to
> > > build APR (since that seems the biggest source of problems), we don't simply
> > > ask them where the tarball is, and th
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:42:53AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:07:57PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> >> hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all
> >> would have to offer on this. so clo
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 06:35:29PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > What if (random thoughts coming out now), instead of requiring people to
> > build APR (since that seems the biggest source of problems), we don't simply
> > ask them where the tarball is, and then in our configure script, we
>
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 02:31:50AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> What if (random thoughts coming out now), instead of requiring people to
> build APR (since that seems the biggest source of problems), we don't simply
> ask them where the tarball is, and then in our configure script, we
> confi
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Donald Ball wrote:
>port="8009" acceptCount="10" debug="0"/>
>
> and i built mod_jk.so and put it in my libexec directory, but i don't know
> how to configure mod_jk in apache's httpd.conf for tomcat-catalina. do you
> have some configuration advice for this situ
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > i care very much about mod_webapp. er, well, to be more clear, i care very
> > much about having an apache-tomcat connector module that doesn't require
> > me to put the same configuration data in two completely different places.
> > i presume mod_
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Donald Ball wrote:
> i care very much about mod_webapp. er, well, to be more clear, i care very
> much about having an apache-tomcat connector module that doesn't require
> me to put the same configuration data in two completely different places.
> i presume mod_webapp is the
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Tomcat's HTTP standalone connector isn't very good at parsing HTTP
> (but, I know the HTTP protocol too well to know where the pitfalls are).
> IMHO, Tomcat shouldn't be allowed to be a web server on its own. It
> needs a connector in front of it.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 11:21:52PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> i care very much about mod_webapp. er, well, to be more clear, i care very
> much about having an apache-tomcat connector module that doesn't require
> me to put the same configuration data in two completely different places.
> i presu
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> It's _VERY_MUCH_ a work in progress... I am NOT DEFINITELY comfortable with
> its code, and I'm the one who wrote it, soo :) :) :)
heh.
> All I can say is that right now I'm so happy to see that few people gave me
> feedback on that piece of c
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:49:15AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> I've checked out actually in detail what APR does for building itself, and a
> lot of resourceful information can be found also in build/rules.mk, that
> gets generated by the APR configure script... I believe that using that an
Donald Ball at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> in general, are tomcat developers comfortable with mod_webapp's stability?
> or is it still very much a work in progress?
It's _VERY_MUCH_ a work in progress... I am NOT DEFINITELY comfortable with
its code, and I'm the one who wrote it, soo :) :)
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:03:47AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Yup, that's what httpd-2.0 does. Just require them to slap the apr
> > sources in srclib (or something like that).
>
> We don't have to stick it into the CVS, but we can ha
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Yup, that's what httpd-2.0 does. Just require them to slap the apr
> sources in srclib (or something like that).
>
> APR isn't standalone just yet. I was shocked when I saw that
> mod_webapp required an install of APR. =) -- justin
I've chec
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all
> > would have to offer on this. so close, and yet...
>
> As Pier said, just add ServerName.
>
> Be nice if you took all of this info and submitted a patch for the docs.
> I'd b
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> Oh, I believe you specified your WebAppDeploy _before_ your ServerName
> directive... If you switch them it should be fine...
aha! voila! WebAppInfo now works great, but WebAppDeploy still fails, i
now get timeouts when i try to hit urls assigned t
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:07:57PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
>> hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all
>> would have to offer on this. so close, and yet...
>
> As Pier said, just add ServerName.
>
> Be nice if you to
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:07:57PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all
> would have to offer on this. so close, and yet...
As Pier said, just add ServerName.
Be nice if you took all of this info and submitted a patch for the docs.
I'd
Donald Ball at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all
> would have to offer on this. so close, and yet...
>
> - donald
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> with this in my httpd.conf:
>
> LoadModule webapp_module libexec/mod_we
hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all
would have to offer on this. so close, and yet...
- donald
-- Forwarded message --
with this in my httpd.conf:
LoadModule webapp_module libexec/mod_webapp.so
AddModule mod_webapp.c
WebAppConnection myConnectio
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Yup, that's what httpd-2.0 does. Just require them to slap the apr
> sources in srclib (or something like that).
We don't have to stick it into the CVS, but we can have a "make srcdist"
target that builds up a tarball with all sources (including
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 02:31:50AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:09:31PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> >>> strange, libapr seems to include libmm, but i went ah
Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:09:31PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
>>> strange, libapr seems to include libmm, but i went ahead and built and
>>> installed libmm seperately in /usr/local/lib. okay, geez,
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:09:31PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
>> strange, libapr seems to include libmm, but i went ahead and built and
>> installed libmm seperately in /usr/local/lib. okay, geez, now i get this
>> error:
>
> It includes it, but mod
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > LoadModule webapp_module libexec/mod_webapp.so
> > AddModule webapp_module
>
> AddModule mod_webapp.c
suggest that y'all fix /webapp/docs/apache-1.3.html if that's the proper
line - which it appears it is - i now get this:
[root@chngw apache]# a
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:09:31PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> strange, libapr seems to include libmm, but i went ahead and built and
> installed libmm seperately in /usr/local/lib. okay, geez, now i get this
> error:
It includes it, but mod_webapp doesn't link it. It seems that Pier is
whipping
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:52:01PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >
> > > You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See
> > > apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taki
Fuck yeah... I'm building a new autoconf for Mod_WebApp using the APRVARS...
Thanks Justin
Pier
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See
> apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taking
> advantage of
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:52:01PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See
> > apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taking
> > advantage of APRVARS (which has this information)
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See
> apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taking
> advantage of APRVARS (which has this information). It doesn't
> seem to be doing so. -- justin
pardon my ignorance, w
You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See
apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taking
advantage of APRVARS (which has this information). It doesn't
seem to be doing so. -- justin
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:26:10PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> On Thu, 28 J
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, kevin seguin wrote:
> use a non-threaded apr with apache 1.3.
thanks. i built apr with --disable-threads and now i get this:
[root@chngw apr]# apachectl configtest
Syntax error on line 41 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_webapp
use a non-threaded apr with apache 1.3.
Donald Ball wrote:
>
> hey guys. i'm trying to get the latest mod_webapp from cvs to work with
> the latest apr from cvs and apache-1.3.12. i'm getting this error when i
> try to test the configuration:
>
> [root@chngw lib]# apachectl configtest
> Syntax
hey guys. i'm trying to get the latest mod_webapp from cvs to work with
the latest apr from cvs and apache-1.3.12. i'm getting this error when i
try to test the configuration:
[root@chngw lib]# apachectl configtest
Syntax error on line 41 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/loc
69 matches
Mail list logo
