only 2 RISCs I've
>>> coded for are PPCs and MIPSes), thus making binaries unportable from one
>>> architecture to another...
>>
>> The atomic for SPARC is using cas that is an 8+ opcode. This causes
>> "problems" on SPARC machines with "
thought is to rely on inter-process
> > mutex locking, instead of atomics)...
> >
> >
> >>Thanks for your time.
> >
> >
> > I feel lucky to have some spare time on my hands :) :) :)
> >
> > Pier
> >
> >
> >>-Cavan M
>
> I feel lucky to have some spare time on my hands :) :) :)
>
> Pier
>
>
>>-Cavan Morris
>>
>>- Original Message -
>>From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL
i" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
> "Cavan Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Attached is an ASCII file wi
s for your time.
I feel lucky to have some spare time on my hands :) :) :)
Pier
> -Cavan Morris
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 200
ocketpool work
may solve bug 8433 or yes that's right, it doesn't compile?
Thanks for your time.
-Cavan Morris
- Original Message -
From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, A
"Cavan Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Guys,
> I reported bug 8433 and am looking for a way to solve it. I thought that the
> socketpool work you're doing might solve the problem but wasn't able to
> compile the latest from cvs.
> My question is do you think that what you're working on
n-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:18 AM
Subject: Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
> Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Hi John-F
Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hi John-Frederic,
>>
>> I've only just seen your mail as I've been away for a few days...
>>
>> Is there any update on this? Have you had a chance to look at the
>> updates I made?
>
>
> Yep... But it needs more when having a not thr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi John-Frederic,
>
> I've only just seen your mail as I've been away for a few days...
>
> Is there any update on this? Have you had a chance to look at the updates I made?
Yep... But it needs more when having a not threaded Apache-1.3 for example.
The code still do
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi John-Frederic,
>
> I've only just seen your mail as I've been away for a few days...
>
> Is there any update on this? Have you had a chance to look at the updates I
> made?
>
> If you want me to do any more work on this just let me know..
Hi John-Frederic,
I've only just seen your mail as I've been away for a few days...
Is there any update on this? Have you had a chance to look at the updates I made?
If you want me to do any more work on this just let me know... BTW I've been testing
this on an NT intranet web server runnin
"jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Simon,
>> both I and JF have been pretty busy this last few days... I wanted to
>> it out also with Apache 2.0's worker MPM before committing...
>
> I have been out for a week... But I will try to find some time today ;-)
Same here, this w
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>As mentioned in my last email I have updated the socketpool changes to
>>incorporate the changes recommended.
>>
>>I'm not sure if my mail was missed or not but I haven't received any feedback
>>on the latest c
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As mentioned in my last email I have updated the socketpool changes to
> incorporate the changes recommended.
>
> I'm not sure if my mail was missed or not but I haven't received any feedback
> on the latest changes. What's the process t
15 matches
Mail list logo
