Fix the latest Bill fix on lb cookies it seems there
is nothing which prevent us from releasing jk 1.2.6.
So if nobody reports a show stopper today, I'll
start the jk 1.2.6 release tomorrow morning CET.
Regards
-
To unsubscribe, e-
Bill,
Much thanks!
We've tested the fixed get_cookie back-ported to mod_jk 1.2.5 and it
works well.
We'll deploy that version into production tonight but I don't expect
any problems. I'll let y'all know if there is.
Sandy
On Jul 20, 2004, at 3:17 PM, Bill Barker wrote:
I see that attachments ar
or
it. I'll commit it later (PST), if nobody else wants it.
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: mod_jk 1.2.6 release ? - session tr
I was thinking something like attached.
- Original Message -
From: "Sandy McArthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 7:04 AM
Subject: Re: mod_jk 1.2.6 release ? - session tracking cookie
On Jul 20, 2004, at 5:27 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Could you send us you workers.properties ?
attached.
workers.properties
Description: Binary data
If
you feel like putting more work into this, adding
'fprintf(stderr,...)'
statements should go to the Apache error_log.
Where did you want me put fpr
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Sandy McArthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: mod_jk 1.2.6 release ? - session tracking cookie
On Jul 19, 2004, at 8:43
- Original Message -
From: "Sandy McArthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: mod_jk 1.2.6 release ? - session tracking cookie
> On Jul 19, 2004, at 8:43 AM, Henri Go
On Jul 19, 2004, at 8:43 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
And since I couldn't delay the release to long, we need a quick reply,
so thanks to take a look at it.
We've setup a current CVS checkout of mod_jk at
http://sp27en1.nerdc.ufl.edu/login.do which is load balancing to our
webmail cluster. If you const
- Original Message -
From: "Sandy McArthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 1:21 AM
Subject: Re: mod_jk 1.2.6 release ? - session tracking cookie
>
> On Jul 19, 2004, at 4:06 AM, H
Sandy McArthur wrote:
On Jul 19, 2004, at 4:06 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Sandy McArthur wrote:
Thinking on it more, I think I'm full of it and I was confusing the
symptoms of two problems that were happening at the same time.
Disregard my comments below until I can double check myself.
Sandy
On Jul
On Jul 19, 2004, at 4:06 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Sandy McArthur wrote:
Thinking on it more, I think I'm full of it and I was confusing the
symptoms of two problems that were happening at the same time.
Disregard my comments below until I can double check myself.
Sandy
On Jul 15, 2004, at 6:01 PM,
Sandy McArthur wrote:
Thinking on it more, I think I'm full of it and I was confusing the
symptoms of two problems that were happening at the same time. Disregard
my comments below until I can double check myself.
Sandy
On Jul 15, 2004, at 6:01 PM, Sandy McArthur wrote:
On Jul 15, 2004, at 3:05
Thinking on it more, I think I'm full of it and I was confusing the
symptoms of two problems that were happening at the same time.
Disregard my comments below until I can double check myself.
Sandy
On Jul 15, 2004, at 6:01 PM, Sandy McArthur wrote:
On Jul 15, 2004, at 3:05 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
On Jul 15, 2004, at 3:05 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Could you take the latest code in CVS and check to see if it solve your
problem ?
We took the new get_cookie() implementation from CVS and replaced the
one in our mod_jk 1.2.5 package and all hell broke loose. The jvmroute
of the JSESSIONID cookie w
Hi,
> Sure see in apr/build/jlibtool.c ;-)
> But we need a little in the configure to check for snprintf and vsnprintf.
why? just make it mandatory for 1.3, this avoids all the hassle, plus has the benefit
that we have a implementation we can trust; f.e. what if config detects the functions
in th
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 unresolved: snprintf and vsnprintf. With Apache-2.0 we should use
apr_snprintf and apr_vsnprintf for Apache-1.3 should I add "ersatz"
routines?
yes; on NetWare we have also with Apache 1.3 another system lib which lacks
support of those two;
so would be cool if we
Hi,
> I have 2 unresolved: snprintf and vsnprintf. With Apache-2.0 we should use
> apr_snprintf and apr_vsnprintf for Apache-1.3 should I add "ersatz"
> routines?
yes; on NetWare we have also with Apache 1.3 another system lib which lacks support of
those two;
so would be cool if we could add jk_s
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old.
Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and
recovery_options). Especially recovery_options is very useful in
transparent administration
Ditto. I started just using CVS-latest for mod_jk and mod_jk2 some time
back as the gap between new, stable feature/fix content and release
labels was just too great. Overall CVS-latest has been more stable than
the last labels for some time now
David Rees wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
the
Henri Gomez wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old.
Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and
recovery_options). Especially recovery_options is very useful in
transparent administration (start/stop) of cluster nod
Henri Gomez wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old.
Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and
recovery_options). Especially recovery_options is very useful in
transparent administration (start/stop) of cluster nod
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well I don't see why the Client Support of Fnac is subscribed here,
so I strongly suggest mailing list manager to remove it.
I'm on a modem this week :/
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
Hi,
a mod_jk 1.2.6 release would be highly welcome.
We are using cvs head in production for a couple of month now without
problems.
thanks,
Hans
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2004 10:01
> An: Tomca
Chère Cliente, Cher Client,
Merci de nous avoir contactés.
Vous venez d'envoyer un message à une adresse ne permettant pas
de recevoir d'e-mail.
Pour trouver les réponses à vos questions sur vos commandes, sur
les produits, sur le site, consultez nos pages d'aide en ligne
en cliquant sur :
http:
Service Client Fnac.com wrote:
Chère Cliente, Cher Client,
Merci de nous avoir contactés.
Vous venez d'envoyer un message à une adresse ne permettant pas
de recevoir d'e-mail.
Pour trouver les réponses à vos questions sur vos commandes, sur
les produits, sur le site, consultez nos pages d'aide en l
Chère Cliente, Cher Client,
Merci de nous avoir contactés.
Vous venez d'envoyer un message à une adresse ne permettant pas
de recevoir d'e-mail.
Pour trouver les réponses à vos questions sur vos commandes, sur
les produits, sur le site, consultez nos pages d'aide en ligne
en cliquant sur :
http:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old.
Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and
recovery_options). Especially recovery_options is very useful in
transparent administration (start/stop) of cluster nodes.
The 1.2 branch
Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old.
> Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and
> recovery_options). Especially recovery_options is very useful in
> transparent administration (start/stop) of cluster nodes.
I would lik
+1
important features to help customers to have a stable loadbalancer...
At Linux Suse 9.0 it works fine.
regards
Peter
Rainer Jung schrieb:
Hi,
the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old.
Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and
recovery_options)
> the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old.
+1 for releasing as son as possible;
we missed already the last service pack on NetWare and had to ship cvs code...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi,
the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old.
Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and
recovery_options). Especially recovery_options is very useful in
transparent administration (start/stop) of cluster nodes.
The 1.2 branch is still the prefe
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 07:18:54PM +0100, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Mike Anderson wrote:
> >I'd like to see this since Henri's timeout fixes really help some issues
> >that we've seen with apps that hang Tomcat threads. It might be good to
> >wait until the POST data issues are resolved (see threads ti
Mike Anderson wrote:
I'd like to see this since Henri's timeout fixes really help some issues
that we've seen with apps that hang Tomcat threads. It might be good to
wait until the POST data issues are resolved (see threads titled "POST
recovery in JK and JK2 HEAD" and "Mod_JK2 - Default Worker")
I'd like to see this since Henri's timeout fixes really help some issues
that we've seen with apps that hang Tomcat threads. It might be good to
wait until the POST data issues are resolved (see threads titled "POST
recovery in JK and JK2 HEAD" and "Mod_JK2 - Default Worker")
Mike Anderson
>>> [
I have noticed a number of bug fixes and patches to mod_jk 1.2.
Whenever you think it is ready I can act as the release manager for
a mod_jk 1.2.6 if you want me to.
Regards,
Glenn
--
Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
35 matches
Mail list logo
