RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>>Renaming mod_jk.c to mod_jk2.c doesn't help too >>much, but it's ok ( and will be more consistent). > >mod_jk2.c is mandatory for : > > > ... handle jk2 directives ... > > >That's why renaming is mandatory > Urg, sorry for all these mandatory words ;? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >> >If you talk about the module name - I think that's >> >absolutely required. >> >> mv mod_jk.c mod_jk2.c, ok ? > >Change build.xml to generate mod_jk2.so, and >the internal name ( so LoadModule will work ). > >Renaming mod_jk.c to mod_jk2.c doesn't

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread costinm
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >If you talk about the module name - I think that's > >absolutely required. > > mv mod_jk.c mod_jk2.c, ok ? Change build.xml to generate mod_jk2.so, and the internal name ( so LoadModule will work ). Renaming mod_jk.c to mod_jk2.c doesn't help too mu

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>>That requires making both versions 'coexist', and >>that requires renaming the module and the conflicting >>directives. > >Done, I'll modify mod_jk.c to mod_jk2.c ASAP Well I'll rename and update build files this nigth (CET) and will commit tomorrow morning (CET) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> Ok, I'd like to have mod_jk 2.x with Apache 1.3 and >> may be with/without APR... > >I start to have doubts about supporting mod_jk2 without >APR - we should keep doing that at least until APR is >officially released and until we have a working >mod_jk2 for IIS/etc using APR. After that we can

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread costinm
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >logger, 'native' maps, pools - and fall back to either > >APR or the 'original' impl. > > Ok, I'd like to have mod_jk 2.x with Apache 1.3 and > may be with/without APR... I start to have doubts about supporting mod_jk2 without APR - we should keep doin

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> BTW: Did there is plan to port mod_jk/2.0.0 to Apache 1.3 >> and IIS/iPlanet/Domino ? > >Of course, but my primary goal is to clean the code and >refactor it - and making it work well with Apache2.0. > >It should be reasonably easy to write the adapters >for the other ( few days for each

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread costinm
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > BTW: Did there is plan to port mod_jk/2.0.0 to Apache 1.3 > and IIS/iPlanet/Domino ? Of course, but my primary goal is to clean the code and refactor it - and making it work well with Apache2.0. It should be reasonably easy to write the adapters f

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>-Original Message- >From: GOMEZ Henri >Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:57 AM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments > > >Oups miss to include diff ;) > >- >Henri Gomez ___

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Oups miss to include diff ;) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 jk2_renaming2.zip Description: jk2_renaming2.zip -- To unsub

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> [Wed Feb 20 00:19:28 2002] [notice] Apache/2.0.28 (Unix) >mod_ssl/3.0a0 OpenSSL/0.9.6b DAV/2 mod_jk/1.2.0 mod_jk/1.2.0 >configured -- resuming normal operations >mod_jk/2.0.0 sounds better. > ok, so let's call it mod_jk/2.0.0 >> 3) To have both installed you should rename mod_jk.so from >

Re: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-19 Thread jean-frederic clere
GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > Ouf, finished the renaming of jk2 (native2) > > Some remarks : > > 1) I choose to rename ALL JK directive since there are >just too many which are common in JK (SSL, LOG, DATE...) > > ... > > AP_INIT_TAKE1( > "Jk2WorkersFile", jk2_set1, "workerFile", RSR

Re: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-19 Thread costinm
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > 1) I choose to rename ALL JK directive since there are >just too many which are common in JK (SSL, LOG, DATE...) I think we should get rid of them too :-) JkWorkersFile should be replaced with a Jk2Properties ( and we should use jk2.properties inst

jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Ouf, finished the renaming of jk2 (native2) Some remarks : 1) I choose to rename ALL JK directive since there are just too many which are common in JK (SSL, LOG, DATE...) ... AP_INIT_TAKE1( "Jk2WorkersFile", jk2_set1, "workerFile", RSRC_CONF, "the name of a worker file f

jk2 renaming

2002-02-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Work is still in progress for the renaming of jk2 (native2) calls and vars to jk2_. Should be achieved tomorrow or on Thursday :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9D