Re: jk2/apr patch v2

2003-11-04 Thread Kurt Miller
From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Kurt Miller wrote: > > Thanks to jean-frederic clere for input on this. Ok, here goes again... ;-) > > > > Attached is a patch that makes the following changes for building jk2 via > > configure and make: > > > > 1) Introduces a new configure argume

Re: jk2/apr patch v2

2003-11-04 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere a écrit : Kurt Miller wrote: Thanks to jean-frederic clere for input on this. Ok, here goes again... ;-) Attached is a patch that makes the following changes for building jk2 via configure and make: 1) Introduces a new configure argument called --enable-apr-threads= for use

Re: jk2/apr patch v2

2003-11-04 Thread jean-frederic clere
Kurt Miller wrote: Thanks to jean-frederic clere for input on this. Ok, here goes again... ;-) Attached is a patch that makes the following changes for building jk2 via configure and make: 1) Introduces a new configure argument called --enable-apr-threads= for use with --with-apr. This argument al

jk2/apr patch v2

2003-11-03 Thread Kurt Miller
Thanks to jean-frederic clere for input on this. Ok, here goes again... ;-) Attached is a patch that makes the following changes for building jk2 via configure and make: 1) Introduces a new configure argument called --enable-apr-threads= for use with --with-apr. This argument allows for threading

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-11-03 Thread Kurt Miller
From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Kurt Miller wrote: > > Before I start making a patch, I'd like to make sure I've got the new > > behavior nailed down... > > > > It seems like there is some conflicting stuff going on. Apr may need to be > > configured without threads at times (with

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-11-03 Thread Kurt Miller
From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ok, > > Who is handling today the many configure/m4 suggestions ? > > BTW, I'm using Redhat 9.0 and the apr-config is available so it should > be a common situation even when it's a distro and not by hand build > Hi Henri, I'm about completed with the pat

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-11-03 Thread Henri Gomez
Ok, Who is handling today the many configure/m4 suggestions ? BTW, I'm using Redhat 9.0 and the apr-config is available so it should be a common situation even when it's a distro and not by hand build - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-11-03 Thread jean-frederic clere
Kurt Miller wrote: From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kurt Miller wrote: Ok thanks for the heads up, I've look briefly at wa_apr.m4 now. I've got a question or two I think there are two cases: 1) when --with-apr is specified 2) when --with-apr-include and --with-apr-lib are spe

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-10-31 Thread Kurt Miller
From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Kurt Miller wrote: > > Ok thanks for the heads up, I've look briefly at wa_apr.m4 now. I've got a > > question or two I think there are two cases: > > > > 1) when --with-apr is specified > > 2) when --with-apr-include and --with-apr-lib are spec

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-10-31 Thread jean-frederic clere
{tempval}" COMMON_APR_OBJECTS="\${COMMON_APR_OBJECTS}" use_apr=true fi - Original Message - From: "Kurt Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-10-31 Thread Kurt Miller
quot;-lapr -L${tempval}" > >> + APR_LDFLAGS="-lapr-0 -L${tempval}" > >>COMMON_APR_OBJECTS="\${COMMON_APR_OBJECTS}" > >> use_apr=true > >> fi > >> > >> > >> - Or

RE: [Fwd: Re: jk2/apr patch]

2003-10-31 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
I'm not receiving this messages from the list, i'll try to unsubscribe them anyway.. Saludos, Ignacio J. Ortega > -Original Message- > From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:39 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject

[Fwd: Re: jk2/apr patch]

2003-10-31 Thread jean-frederic clere
Does someone else got those kind of messages? If yes could the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] be removed from the tomcat-dev list? Cheers Jean-Frederic BTW: I think [EMAIL PROTECTED] should also be removed... --- Begin Message --- AUTOMATED MESSAGE DO NOT REPLY -- The e-ma

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-10-31 Thread jean-frederic clere
}" use_apr=true fi - Original Message - From: "Kurt Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:32 PM Subject: jk2/apr patch Getting ready for jk2 requiring apr

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-10-31 Thread jean-frederic clere
e fi - Original Message - From: "Kurt Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:32 PM Subject: jk2/apr patch Getting ready for jk2 requiring apr (even for Apache13)... Building jk

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-10-30 Thread Kurt Miller
Original Message - From: "Kurt Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:32 PM Subject: jk2/apr patch > Getting ready for jk2 requiring apr (even for Apache13)... Building jk2 > using

jk2/apr patch

2003-10-30 Thread Kurt Miller
Getting ready for jk2 requiring apr (even for Apache13)... Building jk2 using: ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs --with-apr= && make linking fails because the apr library is not named libapr.a it is named libapr-0.a. I'm not sure if this naming problem is universal for all platforms, but lib