GÃnter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
I don't get the problems on my 7.2 and 9.0 ;-(
hmm, maybe it's a 7.1, or 7.0 box; I will check;
but I looked already with man inet_addr and found ulong as return value, and not in_add_t;
do we have any chance that configure detects if we have in_addr_t or not?
Yes, I will
Hi,
> I don't get the problems on my 7.2 and 9.0 ;-(
hmm, maybe it's a 7.1, or 7.0 box; I will check;
but I looked already with man inet_addr and found ulong as return value, and not
in_add_t;
do we have any chance that configure detects if we have in_addr_t or not?
Guenter.
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Adding portable.hnw for netware and portable.hw for windoze and #ifdef for
AS400
is the clean way.
The quick way is adding:
+++
#if !defined(WIN32) && !defined(AS400) && !defined(NETWARE)
#include "portable.h"
#endif
+++
unfortunately it isnt that simple cause I have _two_
Hi,
> Adding portable.hnw for netware and portable.hw for windoze and #ifdef for
> AS400
> is the clean way.
> The quick way is adding:
> +++
> #if !defined(WIN32) && !defined(AS400) && !defined(NETWARE)
> #include "portable.h"
> #endif
> +++
unfortunately it isnt that simple cause I have _two_ di
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connec
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c on two boxes,
SuSE 7.2 and SuSE9, on the first because no in_addr_t, on the second because its
defined as struct and not ulong;
furthermo
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c
on two boxes, SuSE 7.2
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef
like Henry did? I guess there are probably more platforms which dont
have portable.h, s
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c
on two boxes, SuSE 7.2 and SuSE9, on the fir
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c on
two boxes, SuSE 7.2 and SuSE9, on the first because no in_addr_t, on
Henri Gomez wrote:
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef
like Henry did? I guess there are probably more platforms which dont
have portable.h, so it's perhaps a better app
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef like Henry
did? I guess there are probably more platforms which dont have portable.h, so it's
perhaps a better approach to do:
#ifdef
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c on
two boxes, SuSE 7.2 and SuSE9, on the first because no in_addr_t, on
the second because
jean-frederic clere wrote:
> >
> > JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend
> the #ifndef like Henry did?
>
That's the quickest way. The proper would be to have protable.hw and
portable.nw (like APR, Apache, etc... have).
> I don't see what is wrong:
> jk/native/common/porta
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef
like Henry did?
I don't see what is wrong:
jk/native/common/portable.h should be created from portable.h.i
Henri Gomez wrote:
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c on
two boxes, SuSE 7.2 and SuSE9, on the first because no in_addr_t, on
the second because its defined as struct and
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef like Henry did?
I don't see what is wrong:
jk/native/common/portable.h should be created from portable.h.in when doing
configure.
I gu
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c on two boxes,
SuSE 7.2 and SuSE9, on the first because no in_addr_t, on the second because its
defined as struct and not ulong;
furthermo
Hi,
> http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c on two boxes, SuSE
7.2 and SuSE9, on the first because no in_addr_t, on the second because its defined as
struct and not ulong;
furthermore I had exactly t
Hi,
> http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
NetWare binaries for Apache 1.3.x, 2.0.x, 2.1-dev, Netscape are available for testing:
http://www.gknw.com/test/jtc/
Guenter.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
> http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/
JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef like Henry did? I
guess there are probably more platforms which dont have portable.h, so it's perhaps a
better approach to do:
#ifdef HAVE_PORTABLE_H
#i
Henri Gomez wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
I'll tag jk 1.2.6 by 17h CET.
So if you have any showstopper, send me an email :)))
JTC tagged as JK_1_2_6
Now back to jk 1.2.7-dev
tarball to be released soon.
Source tarballs available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6
Henri Gomez wrote:
I'll tag jk 1.2.6 by 17h CET.
So if you have any showstopper, send me an email :)))
JTC tagged as JK_1_2_6
Now back to jk 1.2.7-dev
tarball to be released soon.
Thanks to various commiters to provide the usual
binaries...
Regards
--
I'll tag jk 1.2.6 by 17h CET.
So if you have any showstopper, send me an email :)))
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
24 matches
Mail list logo
