On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> Don't forget that many of us must evaluate
> a KNOWN Apache 2.0 in real environnement.
> The most known are Apache sites which use the released
> version 2.0.24 :)
>
> We could do that a each release (2.0.24/2.0.25) but
> not in real-time ;)
Probably the
>> Many users are still using Apache 2.0.24-alpha (including myself),
>> or even 2.0.18-beta (including IBM iSeries team porting Apache 2.0).
Ok, ok, I could understand your all developpers point of vue,
but let me say it appears just too elitist.
You just can't ask people (developpers or users)
On Thursday 06 September 2001 18:06, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 01:52:50AM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> > Since there is no official release of httpd-2.0, I am confident that
> > nobody will actually care unless they're testing something... And by
> > "testing" good pract
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 01:52:50AM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> Since there is no official release of httpd-2.0, I am confident that nobody
> will actually care unless they're testing something... And by "testing" good
> practice says "get the HEAD of CVS and try it out yourself if it doesn't
>
