GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I have added support for static linking of mod_jk (for
> >Apache-1.3.x). I have
> >used automake to reach it, it has side effects I would like to comment:
> >- apxs cannot be used build mod_jk.so.
> >- It needs autoconf/automake for prepare the *.in file. (Only
>Hi,
>
>I have added support for static linking of mod_jk (for
>Apache-1.3.x). I have
>used automake to reach it, it has side effects I would like to comment:
>- apxs cannot be used build mod_jk.so.
>- It needs autoconf/automake for prepare the *.in file. (Only
>for develloppers).
>- It needs li
Hi,
I have added support for static linking of mod_jk (for Apache-1.3.x). I have
used automake to reach it, it has side effects I would like to comment:
- apxs cannot be used build mod_jk.so.
- It needs autoconf/automake for prepare the *.in file. (Only for develloppers).
- It needs libtools.
I
>> Error - it shouldn't be in common...
Are you sure ?
in jk_jni_worker there is a jni_worker_factory() which is
referenced in jk_worker_list.h which is used to determine
workers in jk_worker.c (get_factory_for).
If jk_jni_worker is removed from common, it should be also
removed from the lis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 May 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
> > By the way I have a question: Why jk_jni_worker.c is in common not in jni? What
> > it is used for? (I have to add JAVA_HOME to the configure for it and I am
> > curious).
>
> Error - it shouldn't be in common...
On Tue, 15 May 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> By the way I have a question: Why jk_jni_worker.c is in common not in jni? What
> it is used for? (I have to add JAVA_HOME to the configure for it and I am
> curious).
Error - it shouldn't be in common...
jk_jni_worker uses JNI to start tomcat i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Wow, it is so good to see development discussion on tomcat-dev, and be
> able to participate :-)
>
> I have a big question - what happens if configure/libtool is used and
> different options are given for mod_jk and apache ?
>
> I can't give a concrete example, but
Wow, it is so good to see development discussion on tomcat-dev, and be
able to participate :-)
I have a big question - what happens if configure/libtool is used and
different options are given for mod_jk and apache ?
I can't give a concrete example, but APXS had the big benefit that it
"cached"
>My idea is to build one connector per call of configure/make,
>--with-java should
>build the JNI support, correct?
>I have noted that common contains jk_jni_worker.c, should not
>we move it in jni?
no, jk_jni_worker could also be used into apache 1.3/2.0.
And that's HOW IBM use mod_jk on at le
>> > The configure.in assumes that the Apache connectors
>sub-directories are
>> > apache-1.3 and apache-2.0. I think that more consistant
>with mod_webapp.
done
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 May 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have started a configure.in and makefile(s).in for the
> > jakarta-tomcat-connectors.
>
> Excelent !
>
> > Currently I have just prepared it for Apache2.0 and Apache1.3, before going on I
> > have
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> >I have started a configure.in and makefile(s).in for the
> >jakarta-tomcat-connectors.
> >Currently I have just prepared it for Apache2.0 and Apache1.3,
> >before going on I
> >have some questions:
>
> I tested the configure/makefile stuff and it works well but
> could yo
>I have started a configure.in and makefile(s).in for the
>jakarta-tomcat-connectors.
>Currently I have just prepared it for Apache2.0 and Apache1.3,
>before going on I
>have some questions:
I tested the configure/makefile stuff and it works well but
could you also add the java detection for JNI
On Mon, 14 May 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have started a configure.in and makefile(s).in for the
> jakarta-tomcat-connectors.
Excelent !
> Currently I have just prepared it for Apache2.0 and Apache1.3, before going on I
> have some questions:
>
> - The idea is to have one co
>I have started a configure.in and makefile(s).in for the
>jakarta-tomcat-connectors.
Thanks great works :!
>Currently I have just prepared it for Apache2.0 and Apache1.3,
>before going on I
>have some questions:
>
>- The idea is to have one configure.in in
>jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/src/nat
Hi,
I have started a configure.in and makefile(s).in for the
jakarta-tomcat-connectors.
Currently I have just prepared it for Apache2.0 and Apache1.3, before going on I
have some questions:
- The idea is to have one configure.in in
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/src/native and a makefile.in for ea
16 matches
Mail list logo
