DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27043] - Compiler doesn't like // comments when building mod_jk

2004-02-18 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27043 Compiler doesn't like // comments when building mod_jk [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27043] New: - Compiler doesn't like // comments when building mod_jk

2004-02-18 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27043 Compiler doesn't like // comments when building mod_jk Summary: Compiler doesn't like // comments when building mod_jk Product: Tomcat 3 Version: 3.3.1 Final Platform: Other OS/Version: AIX

Errors for building mod_jk

2002-09-04 Thread Manoj Kithany
Hi Experts, Greetings! I am using APache(1.3) and Tomcat (4.0.4) on IBM AIX (5.1) System. I am havin high time in integrating APache and Tomcat. Binary "mod_jk" is NOT available for IBM AIX System - so I try to build it using following procedure but get ERRORS. I tried to execute "./buildconf

Re: HELP ! building mod_jk with fdatasync...

2002-03-18 Thread Adam Fowler
Hello, Take a look at a little How-To I wrote about this time last year at:- http://users.aber.ac.uk/aff9/tomcat I also have binary links listed on that page. Hope that helps, Adam. On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 12:13, Rosario Turco wrote: > > Telesoft, Naples. > > Hi. > > Mod_jk.so is a necessary

HELP ! building mod_jk with fdatasync...

2002-03-18 Thread Rosario Turco
Telesoft, Naples. Hi. Mod_jk.so is a necessary library that allows the interation beetween Apache and Tomcat to use Servlets and JSPs technology, but i have seen that in the URLs' Open Source there aren't Binary Distribution of mod_jk.so for different platforms as SUN Solaris, Tru64 Unix and

Help: Building mod_jk on HPUX ...

2001-11-29 Thread Rob Weaver
a non-existent binary "httpd" instead of the current "httpds" for instance). Even after mucking with the files I end up with errors on an include file: $ build-hpux.sh Building mod_jk gcc -DSOLARIS2=260 -DMOD_SSL=204110 -DEAPI -DUSE_EXPAT -I../lib/expat-lite -fPIC -DSHARED_MODULE

RE: [J-T-C] Update: Building mod_jk for Apache 2.0/Windows

2001-10-03 Thread Marc Saegesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of jean-frederic clere > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [J-T-C] Update: Building mod_jk for Apache 2.0/Windows > > > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > > On

Re: [J-T-C] Update: Building mod_jk for Apache 2.0/Windows

2001-10-03 Thread jean-frederic clere
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:24:53PM -0500, Marc Saegesser wrote: > > I'll grab the latest CVS and see how that works. > > > > The buildconf.sh in jk/native/Apache-2.0 runs libtoolize, automake, aclocal > > and autoconf. Cygwin includes all of these except libtool. I

Re: [J-T-C] Update: Building mod_jk for Apache 2.0/Windows

2001-10-02 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:24:53PM -0500, Marc Saegesser wrote: > I'll grab the latest CVS and see how that works. > > The buildconf.sh in jk/native/Apache-2.0 runs libtoolize, automake, aclocal > and autoconf. Cygwin includes all of these except libtool. I built it and > installed it into /usr

RE: [J-T-C] Update: Building mod_jk for Apache 2.0/Windows

2001-10-02 Thread Marc Saegesser
hings ran fine. Marc Saegesser > -Original Message- > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [J-T-C] Update: Building mod_jk for Apache 2.0/Windows > > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2

Re: [J-T-C] Update: Building mod_jk for Apache 2.0/Windows

2001-10-02 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:29:41AM -0500, Marc Saegesser wrote: > Here's an update on where I stand right now on building/running mod_jk for > Apache 2.0 beta 16. Please don't use Apache 2.0.16. Use the latest version from CVS. Also, I'm not sure where automake is coming from - we don't use tha

RE: [J-T-C] Update: Building mod_jk for Apache 2.0/Windows

2001-10-02 Thread Marc Saegesser
cided to give up and work on the .dsp file. Marc Saegesser > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of jean-frederic clere > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [J-T-C] Update: Buildin

Re: [J-T-C] Update: Building mod_jk for Apache 2.0/Windows

2001-10-02 Thread jean-frederic clere
in the browser. I use telnet to issue the request I get back what looks > like a valid response. I'll investigate this later today. > > Marc Saegesser > > > -Original Message- > > From: Marc Saegesser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, Septem

RE: [J-T-C] Update: Building mod_jk for Apache 2.0/Windows

2001-10-02 Thread Marc Saegesser
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 5:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [J-T-C] Building mod_jk for Apache 2.0/Windows > > > I'd like to start experimenting with Tomcat and Apache 2.0. The > Apache 2.0 > code in the tomcat_32 branch appears to

building mod_jk

2001-04-12 Thread Jason Novotny
In using the jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/apache1.3/build-unix.sh script to build mod_jk, I notice it works only on linux. It turns out that the version of find on Solaris doesn't have the -printf option. After some experimenting it looks like # use "find" to pick the right include dire

Re: Problem building mod_jk on HP-UX 11.00

2001-03-02 Thread Yaqing Wang
So this checkin is just for branched JSP label? Just want to be sure. Also thanks for interviewing the candidate yesterday. What do you think about him? What's the rank (1 - 10) you wil give him? Alex Yiu wrote: > Yes. a branch for JSP Oracle 9i beta releas was made already. > > Yaqing Wang wr

Problem building mod_jk on HP-UX 11.00

2001-03-02 Thread Dennis Blaas
Hello, I try to build mod_jk module on HP-UX 11.00 but I have many problem in compilation. Is there anybody who has tried this porting? My configuration is: Tomcat 3.2.1 and Apache 1.3.9 Thank you in advance, Best Regards. begin:vcard n:Blaas;Dennis tel;cell:+39 0335 68345

Re: Building mod_jk 3.2.1 on Solaris

2001-02-27 Thread Filip Hanik
PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 1:43 PM Subject: Building mod_jk 3.2.1 on Solaris > Cats, > > I'm trying to build mod_jk for use with Apache 1.3.14 + mod_ssl 2.7 on Solaris 8, following instructions at <http://jakarta.apache.org/tom

Building mod_jk 3.2.1 on Solaris

2001-02-27 Thread Chris Pepper
Cats, I'm trying to build mod_jk for use with Apache 1.3.14 + mod_ssl 2.7 on Solaris 8, following instructions at . Apache+mod_ssl is already compiled and working, but apxs fails, and mod_jk.so doesn't get

Re: HELP ! building mod_jk with fdatasync...

2000-12-12 Thread Michael Grinder
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, jackie wrote: > Hello, > I am trying to run tomcat 3.2 with apache 1.3 on Solaris 2.6. I can > make the mod_jk.so by > > apxs -o mod_jk.so -DSOLARIS -I../jk -I/usr/java/include > -I/usr/java/include/solaris -c *.c ../jk/*.c > and then run > gcc -shared -o mod_jk.so *.o >

HELP ! building mod_jk with fdatasync...

2000-12-12 Thread jackie
Hello,     I am trying to run tomcat 3.2 with apache 1.3 on Solaris 2.6. I can make the mod_jk.so by apxs -o mod_jk.so -DSOLARIS -I../jk -I/usr/java/include -I/usr/java/include/solaris -c *.c ../jk/*.c and then run gcc -shared -o mod_jk.so *.o   I receive the error "symbol fdata

Re: building mod_jk on freebsd 4.0

2000-12-06 Thread Palle Girgensohn
Hi Jeremy! I have exactly the same setup as you, and it works fine after som tweaking. Here's what I had to do to Makefile.freebsd to make it work. Maybe it will help? --- Makefile.freebsd.orig Tue Dec 5 18:51:22 2000 +++ Makefile.freebsdTue Dec 5 19:24:07 2000 @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ ##

Re: building mod_jk on freebsd 4.0

2000-12-06 Thread Jeremy Hopkins
Hello there, I am currently tasked with upgrading our current tomcat 3.1 deployment to tomcat 3.2. So far I am pleased with both versions of tomcat. Although, while attempting to switch over to the recomended mod_jk.so from the older mod_jserv.so I run into errors loading mod_jk.so into