On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Jason Brittain wrote:
> Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>
> > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> >
> >> why not do iot in shared storage and implement SSI ? thats what the
> >> mod_jserv shm file was for...a shared hunk of disk store.
> >> -Ys-
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > T
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>
> > why not do iot in shared storage and implement SSI ? thats what the
> > mod_jserv shm file was for...a shared hunk of disk store.
> > -Ys-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This is certainly one valid approach. It wor
Hi Shai,
Thanks for your patch, it's a very good start and I think it'll be useful
for many users.
I think it needs some more work - I'm not talking about the main
functionality you are implementing, which I'm sure will be tested and
improved and will have a nice evolution.
I'm talking as a p
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: lunes 25 de diciembre de 2000 1:16
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: RE: [PATCH] Tomcat session replicator - Pathces for phase I
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure about that.
> Jon wants to override session's read/write object. He
stream.writeObject(new Hashtable());
}
}
--Shai
-Original Message-
From: Nacho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 25, 2000 02:07
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Tomcat session replicator - Pathces for phase I
Hola Shai:
for
on 12/24/2000 3:58 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ahh...
>
> The patches I have sent were written originally to 3.2.
> Jon's code was part of 3.2 (and I have used it) but is not included in 3.3.
>
> Thanks to Jon having my attention to that. I'll fix that soon.
>
> --Shai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: lunes 25 de diciembre de 2000 0:32
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: RE: [PATCH] Tomcat session replicator - Pathces for phase I
>
>
> Where is the piece of code you have written for jserv???
>
> --Shai
>
> -Original Message
nt: Monday, December 25, 2000 01:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tomcat session replicator - Pathces for phase I
on 12/24/2000 3:31 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where is the piece of code you have written for jserv???
>
> --Shai
Jon,
I believe that you want people to contribute to this project,
but comments like the ones you made in this thread are more
likely to scare people away. I'm afraid many would-be
contributors read these mails and think "if this is the way
my contributions will be received, I'm out of here".
on 12/24/2000 3:31 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where is the piece of code you have written for jserv???
>
> --Shai
Now that is a really funny question. Think about it for a second.
-jon
Where is the piece of code you have written for jserv???
--Shai
-Original Message-
From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 25, 2000 00:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tomcat session replicator - Pathces for phase I
on 12/24/2000 1:26 PM
on 12/24/2000 1:26 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> try {
> + fStream = new FileOutputStream(f);
> + oStream = new ObjectOutputStream(fStream);
> + // Serialize to file all active session
> + Enumeration ids = sessions.keys();
> + ServerSession session = null;
> +
on 12/24/2000 1:26 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + while (ids.hasMoreElements()) {
> +session =
> findSession(ids.nextElement().toString());
> +if (!session.getTimeStamp().isValid())
> + continue;
> +oStream.writeObject(session);
> + }
> + oStream.fl
on 12/24/2000 1:26 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + try {
> + fStream = new FileOutputStream(f);
> + oStream = new ObjectOutputStream(fStream);
> + // Serialize to file all active session
> + Enumeration ids = sessions.keys();
> + ServerSession session = null;
> +
Again, with patches as attachment.
--Shai
-Original Message-
From: Shai Fultheim (BRM IL)
Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2000 23:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] Tomcat session replicator - Pathces for phase I
Hi,
These patches will allow you to add serialize="true&qu
Hi,
These patches will allow you to add serialize="true" to you context and
having your context saved to disk.
Index: src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core/Context.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed the following on 10:35 AM 12/22/2000 +0200
...
>Mod_jk on each machine forward requests based on sessionID to the right
>tomcat (this is my patch to 3.2b7).
...
>THE NEW IDEA is, assuming all of what I have stated above is working. We can
>take apache out of the picture.
>H
+1
Nacho wrote:
>
> Shai has contributed great bug fixes ( one specially difficult in 3.2,
> thanks Shai ) and he wants to contribute a distributed session manager
>
>
> It has been proposed as committer by Craig in a informal way, now it's
> proposed in a formal way :-)
>
> it has my +1
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>
>> why not do iot in shared storage and implement SSI ? thats what the
>> mod_jserv shm file was for...a shared hunk of disk store.
>> -Ys-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> This is certainly one valid approach. It works for cases where the s
Shai,
I don't fully understand what you're proposing, and I want to make sure I do. It kind
of sounds like you're saying that the web server would be configured to point to a
single TC instance, and that that instance would then do load-balancing (and could
also have enough information to sen
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> why not do iot in shared storage and implement SSI ? thats what the
> mod_jserv shm file was for...a shared hunk of disk store.
> -Ys-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is certainly one valid approach. It works for cases where the servers are all
on the same machine. But yo
+1
Nacho wrote:
>
> Shai has contributed great bug fixes ( one specially difficult in 3.2,
> thanks Shai ) and he wants to contribute a distributed session manager
>
>
> It has been proposed as committer by Craig in a informal way, now it's
> proposed in a formal way :-)
>
> it has my +1
e diciembre de 2000 20:14
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: Re: Tomcat session replicator
>
>
> Shai,
> I apologize for not responding to you earlier ... substantive
> discussions are getting a little lost in the noise at
Nacho wrote:
>
> Shai has contributed great bug fixes ( one specially difficult in 3.2,
> thanks Shai ) and he wants to contribute a distributed session manager
>
>
> It has been proposed as committer by Craig in a informal way, now it's
> proposed in a formal way :-)
>
> it has my +1 as w
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Two weeks ago I posted note here saying I'm going to write patch for Tomcat
> > 3.2 to support redundancy, in manner of having session information stored
> > between reloads and shared between tomcat instances.
> > In order to support tomcat redu
icer
BRM Seed
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: 972-53-866-459
Office: 972-2-5891-459
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 14:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tomcat session replicator
Interesting subject, a farm of Apache behind a
+1 for Shai Fultheim
-- Pierre
n the message below.
Votes , please.
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
-Mensaje original-
De: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: jueves 21 de diciembre de 2000 20:14
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: Tomcat session replicator
Sha
Interesting subject, a farm of Apache behind a larger farm of Tomcats ?
Let me develop :
Could we have say a farm of X Apache connected to a farm of Y Tomcat where
Y = 2 * X or Y = 3 * X ?
Also could the session replicator be compatible with eventuals ACL/Crypto
in mod_jk/ajp protocols ?
"
]]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000
21:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat session
replicator
Shai,
I apologize for not responding to you
earlier ... substantive discussions are getting a little lost in the noise at
the moment.
For some reason
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> At ApacheCon Europe (it was also presented in Orlando last March, but I missed
> it then), there was a very interesting session by Theo Schlossnagle
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about the Backhand Project, which is focused on providing
> load balancing support for Apache as
Jason Brittain wrote:
> Hi guys..
>
> I'm one of the other folks that have voiced some desire to implement
> distributed sessions and distributed servlet container functionality in
> Tomcat (although I only want to work on 4.0!). I'd love to collaborate
> with others on the design and implementa
Hi guys..
I'm one of the other folks that have voiced some desire to implement
distributed sessions and distributed servlet container functionality in
Tomcat (although I only want to work on 4.0!). I'd love to collaborate
with others on the design and implementation. More below:
Craig R. McCl
> Two weeks ago I posted note here saying I'm going to write patch for Tomcat
> 3.2 to support redundancy, in manner of having session information stored
> between reloads and shared between tomcat instances.
> In order to support tomcat redundancy I thought on implementing that in two
> phases:
Shai,
I apologize for not responding to you earlier ... substantive discussions
are getting a little lost in the noise at the moment.
For some reason, my Netscape mail reader won't let me intersperse comments
-- so I've put them at the end.
I think I read into your earlier comment that you'd be
Hi,
Two weeks ago I posted note here saying I’m going to write patch for
Tomcat 3.2 to support redundancy, in manner of having session information
stored between reloads and shared between tomcat instances.
In order to support tomcat redundancy I thought on implementing that in
two pha
36 matches
Mail list logo
