Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Dave Oxley wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:59:55 +0100
> > > From: Dave Oxley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I would be more in favor of releasing a 4.1 before that, focusing
> mostly on small refactorings of the core (like the error report refactoring
> I just did) and optimizations.
>
> More specifically, that would include:
> - the Service stuf
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is not yet decided how we'll release the new modules, but the main
> idea is to keep the 'base' version as small and clean as possible, and
> all features to be 'add-ons', outside of the base distribution, and have
> only bug fixes in 3.3.x-rele
"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Implementing a nice administration/configuration interface (as a
> web app), talking to server components through a JMX interface
> (so that Tomcat can be managed by any JMX compliant tool). Some
> time ago I published some functional requirem
> AFAIK there is no plan for a 3.4 release after 3.3 - that doesn't mean 3.x
> will be obsolete, just that the core is now stable and unlikely to
> change, except bugfixes.
>
> Having a stable core is essential for module development and for enhancing
> the current set of modules. Even if there ar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Having a stable core is essential for module development and for enhancing
> the current set of modules. Even if there are many improvements we can add
> to 3.3, I believe the benefit of keeping 3.3 stable is far bigger.
Just to confirm this point, I've been running 3.
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > What would *you* like to see happen? (And what would *you* like to work
> > on to make it happen? :-).
Cleaning up and modularizing the current 4.0 is probably the most
important thing to happen before any more features are added, and that's
what
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Dave Oxley wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:59:55 +0100
> > From: Dave Oxley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Tomcat next
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> What would *you* like to see happen? (And what would
> *you* like to work on to make it happen? :-).
did you see my message about virtual host support for
authenticators and realms? :)
i will likely be able to put some time into it in the near
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Dave Oxley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A couple of questions on future Tomcat releases:
>
> 1. Will there be a TC3.4 release or is 3.x obsolete after 3.3?
AFAIK there is no plan for a 3.4 release after 3.3 - that doesn't mean 3.x
will be obsolete, just that the core is now stable a
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Dave Oxley wrote:
> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:59:55 +0100
> From: Dave Oxley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Tomcat next
>
> Hi all,
>
> A couple of questions on future Tomcat relea
Hi all,
A couple of questions on future Tomcat releases:
1. Will there be a TC3.4 release or is 3.x obsolete after 3.3?
2. Has TC4.0 been branched (i.e. has development started on TC4.1 or are you
waiting for TC4.0.1 to branch?)
3. Is there a list of planned features for TC4.1?
Dave
[EMAIL PRO
12 matches
Mail list logo