DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3606] - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

2001-09-23 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

RE: [Bug 3606] New: - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

2001-09-17 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>Obviously configuration should go in /etc and logging in >/var/log (helps with >logrotate) logrotate couldn't do anything with that tomcat logfile since Tomcat will keep using the initial file, even if that one has been renamed and gzipped. A real candidate for jakarta-service, to intercep

Re: [Bug 3606] New: - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

2001-09-14 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 2001.09.14 11:10, GOMEZ Henri a écrit : > Could you stop mark as bug things which are only > just requests of features. Sorry, forgot about this one (did so for the others, though) -- Nicolas Mailhot

[Bug 3606] - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Normal |Enhancement

RE: [Bug 3606] New: - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

2001-09-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 11:08 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Bug 3606] New: - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant > > >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 > >

[Bug 3606] New: - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

2001-09-14 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 Summary: Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant Product: Tomcat 3 Version: 3.3 Beta 2 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other

Re: Tomcat RPMs

2000-12-14 Thread Gomez Henri
> I've been experimenting with your RPM files (and considering replacing > my custom-built ones with yours), and it looks like you set things up > in > a directory tree that makes a lot of sense if you're coming from a > RedHat environment as I am. Thanks. > One thing I did with my RPMs though,