Re: Tomcat/APR benchmark results

2005-04-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, Here are the brief results for Tomcat HEAD: Server Threads Pause (ms) Error(%) Rate (req/sec) Apache2.0.49500 1000 1.74 124.2 Http11Protocol 500 1000 0.20 139.5 Http11AprProtocol 500 1000 0.00 266.9 Tests has

Re: Tomcat/APR benchmark results

2005-04-21 Thread Mladen Turk
Jess Holle wrote: Would we expect anything markedly different with Apache 2 worker rather than prefork? No. Also I found that the majority of users is usig prefork because of PHP. This would seem a bit more of an apples-to-apples comparison (i.e. comparing multi-threaded low-process count server

Re: Tomcat/APR benchmark results

2005-04-21 Thread Peter Lin
I'll try running the same jmeter test plan on apache2 this weekend, but I'm guessing the difference will be minimal. based on the results for the static file benchmarks, the delta between 1.3.x and 2.x wasn't significant. I think those numbers are in the excel spreadsheet I posted http://people.a

Re: Tomcat/APR benchmark results

2005-04-21 Thread Jess Holle
Would we expect anything markedly different with Apache 2 worker rather than prefork? This would seem a bit more of an apples-to-apples comparison (i.e. comparing multi-threaded low-process count servers). Also how many simultaneous workers (threads/processes/whatever) were allowewd in each c

Re: Tomcat/APR benchmark results

2005-04-21 Thread Peter Lin
I'll be using my AMD 2ghz linux box running Fedora Core1. haven't updated to FC3 yet, though remy keeps suggesting I upgrade :) peter On 4/21/05, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Lin wrote: > > Cool. I assume you were finally able to my test plan mladen? > > Yes. I've run them ex

Re: Tomcat/APR benchmark results

2005-04-21 Thread Mladen Turk
Peter Lin wrote: Cool. I assume you were finally able to my test plan mladen? Yes. I've run them extensively, thanks for sharing those. Been playing with the constant timer, number of threads, etc... Results show that for high number of connections the APR implementation is way ahead of any other.

Re: Tomcat/APR benchmark results

2005-04-21 Thread Peter Lin
Cool. I assume you were finally able to my test plan mladen? I plan to run the benchmarks on my system this weekend, not that my laptop is healthy. peter On 4/21/05, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Here are the brief results for Tomcat HEAD: > > Server Threads Pause

Tomcat/APR benchmark results

2005-04-21 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, Here are the brief results for Tomcat HEAD: Server Threads Pause (ms) Error(%) Rate (req/sec) Apache2.0.49500 1000 1.74 124.2 Http11Protocol 500 1000 0.20 139.5 Http11AprProtocol 500 1000 0.00 266.9 Tests has been run on SLES9/6