Re: Table of Contents

2001-07-11 Thread Punky Tse
> > > > P.S. What hacker I mean is: The one who read the source code and make > > change to it so that the whole system get benefit from it. So you are > > hacker. (but me not yet). The guy who break the system is > > cracker, or black > > hacker to be specific. > ??? A cracker is a criminal

RE: Table of Contents

2001-07-11 Thread Martin van den Bemt
> > P.S. What hacker I mean is: The one who read the source code and make > change to it so that the whole system get benefit from it. So you are > hacker. (but me not yet). The guy who break the system is > cracker, or black > hacker to be specific. ??? A cracker is a criminal hacker. not some

Re: [DOC] Table of Contents

2001-07-11 Thread Alex Chaffee
Punky Tse wrote: >>>3) How about putting all the installation and configuration of Tomcat >>>standalone first, and then followed by some chapters (advanced topics) >>> > about > >>>Running Tomcat behind web servers? >>> >> >>It's already organized that way. See the first paragraph of the >>"edit

Re: Table of Contents

2001-07-10 Thread Punky Tse
> >2) How about moving Developing Interceptors, Valves and Connectors, and > >Using Tomcat Utility Classes to a seperate Developer Guide? > >They are only > >useful for real hackers. > > Don't forget what make Apache HTTP server so successfull. > The number of modules built for Apache 1.2/1.3 AP

Re: Copyright issues (was Re: DOC: Table of Contents)

2001-07-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
ere > > sure I'd keep my rights to use it too. If anyone can enlighten me on > > this topic, please respond with a separate subject line (like > > "Copyrights") so we can keep discussions of copyright separate from > > discussions of the table of contents itsel

Re: [DOC] Table of Contents

2001-07-10 Thread Punky Tse
> > 3) How about putting all the installation and configuration of Tomcat > > standalone first, and then followed by some chapters (advanced topics) about > > Running Tomcat behind web servers? > > > It's already organized that way. See the first paragraph of the > "editorial notes:" > >>I think

Re: [DOC] Table of Contents

2001-07-10 Thread Alex Chaffee
Martin van den Bemt wrote: > I'm missing a very important one : servlet debugging. All the development > environments support jps debugging, but servlet debugging is still a pain.. > So that could need some explenation.. > See http://www.jguru.com/faq/view.jsp?EID=158 I've added it to the T

RE: [DOC] Table of Contents

2001-07-10 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 4:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [DOC] Table of Contents > > > OK, at Craig's request, here's the current Table of Contents for Tomcat > docs. (I wrote a program to convert *** to 1.2.3. format so it's easier > to read.) &g

RE: Table of Contents

2001-07-10 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>2) How about moving Developing Interceptors, Valves and Connectors, and >Using Tomcat Utility Classes to a seperate Developer Guide? >They are only >useful for real hackers. Don't forget what make Apache HTTP server so successfull. The number of modules built for Apache 1.2/1.3 APIs. If we do

Re: Table of Contents

2001-07-09 Thread Alex Chaffee
Punky Tse wrote: > Alex, > > Please see my comment below: > > 1) The details of the TOC looks better than my version. Thanks :) > 2) How about moving Developing Interceptors, Valves and Connectors, and > Using Tomcat Utility Classes to a seperate Developer Guide? They are only > useful for

[DOC] Table of Contents

2001-07-09 Thread Alex Chaffee
OK, at Craig's request, here's the current Table of Contents for Tomcat docs. (I wrote a program to convert *** to 1.2.3. format so it's easier to read.) It just occured to me that maybe the TOC will be applicable to both versions (3 vs 4), even though the content of each

Re: Table of Contents

2001-07-09 Thread Punky Tse
- From: "Alex Chaffee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 1:02 AM Subject: DOC: Table of Contents > Here's my current Table of Contents. As

Copyright issues (was Re: DOC: Table of Contents)

2001-07-09 Thread Alex Fernández
contribute it explicitly as open source if I were > sure I'd keep my rights to use it too. If anyone can enlighten me on > this topic, please respond with a separate subject line (like > "Copyrights") so we can keep discussions of copyright separate from > discussions o

Re: DOC: Table of Contents

2001-07-06 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
roject. I'd contribute it explicitly as open source if I were > sure I'd keep my rights to use it too. If anyone can enlighten me on > this topic, please respond with a separate subject line (like > "Copyrights") so we can keep discussions of copyright separate from > d

DOC: Table of Contents

2001-07-06 Thread Alex Chaffee
Here's my current Table of Contents. As I said in an earlier message, > I'd like to organize this TOC as a little more abstract than a simple table of contents. Each section should be organized to contain not just our original documents, but also a list of other resources on that