Dan Milstein wrote:
> Craig,
>
> I assume I'm the person interested in porting mod_jk to TC 4 (if there's anyone
>else, please get in touch with me ;-).
>
> Thank you for clarifying the issue about the difference between the 2.2 and 2.3
>specs -- I hadn't realized that.
>
> I do have a questi
Oups didn't view your reply in the list.
>Tomcat 4.0 did not select mod_jk for several reasons. The
>most important ones
>are at the top:
>
>* MOD_JK (like MOD_JSERV before it) has no clue what a web
> application is. This forces you to configure many items twice --
> once in the web.xml fil
>Craig,
>
>I assume I'm the person interested in porting mod_jk to TC 4
>(if there's anyone else, please get in touch with me ;-).
And you may have also to ports patch from 3.2/3.3 to 4.0 ;-)
>Thank you for clarifying the issue about the difference
>between the 2.2 and 2.3 specs -- I hadn't
Craig,
I assume I'm the person interested in porting mod_jk to TC 4 (if there's anyone else,
please get in touch with me ;-).
Thank you for clarifying the issue about the difference between the 2.2 and 2.3 specs
-- I hadn't realized that.
I do have a question: how would you feel about includi
