Henri Yandell wrote:
On 8/17/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. j-t-service, j-t-site, j-t-tools
Ready to do phase-2?
Where should they go in svn:tomcat/?
Which need tags/branches?
So it would be tomcat/service, tomcat/site, tomcat/tools, etc ?
Rémy
--
On 8/17/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2. j-t-service, j-t-site, j-t-tools
Ready to do phase-2?
Where should they go in svn:tomcat/?
Which need tags/branches?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 8/17/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. j-t-service, j-t-site
3. j-servletapi, j-servletapi-4, j-servletapi-5
4. j-tomcat, j-tomcat-4.0
5. j-t-catalina, j-t-5, j-t-jasper, j-t-connectors
Any other comments/concerns?
I have jakarta-tools down as a Tomcat CVS
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List"
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: Subversion migration update
On 8/17/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Assuming everyone else
On 8/17/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Assuming everyone else is happy to move the remaining tomcat modules
> to SVN I would suggest the following stages (Watchdog was stage 1).
> I'll give people at least a week to comment on this proposal and
> assuming no -1's start the phase 2 to
Mark Thomas wrote:
Not having been around when we have done this before, do we just branch
the previous version? If so, the simplest thing to do would be to create
5.5.x branches for each component and develop 6.0 (assuming we call it
that) in trunk. I can do this as soon as we are ready.
Yes
On 8/18/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >> Mark Thomas wrote:
> >>
> >> I am +1 for moving the remaining Tomcat CVS modules to SVN.
> >
> > I'm +10^-60 or something.
>
> He he he.
Well, the +10 is promising :)
> > Right after that, we'll need new repositories
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
I am +1 for moving the remaining Tomcat CVS modules to SVN.
I'm +10^-60 or something.
He he he.
Right after that, we'll need new repositories to implement the new
Servlet 2.5 / JSP 2.1.
Not having been around when we have done this before, do we j
Mark Thomas wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
The performance comparison between CVS and SVN is in the early stages
and I will post some results once I have a more complete set.
Tests performed on WinXP SP2, with Tortoise CVS 1.8.18 and Tortoise SVN
1.2.1 using the Watchdog repository. For tests u
Mark Thomas wrote:
The performance comparison between CVS and SVN is in the early stages
and I will post some results once I have a more complete set.
Tests performed on WinXP SP2, with Tortoise CVS 1.8.18 and Tortoise
SVN 1.2.1 using the Watchdog repository. For tests using a single file
I
Hi all,
Just a quick note to keep you updated with my progress with
Subversion. jakarta-watchdog and jakarta-watchdog-4.0 should be
migrated shortly. As a result of some questions from Henri, the final
structure has been modified slightly to make it clearer which tags and
branches belong to w
11 matches
Mail list logo
