On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> > Yes, I think the session manager should be a separate module, with minimal
> > dependencies on other components.
>
> Given that the 4.0 architecture exists, works fine, lasts a long time,
> ... what you'd want, then, is for the existing Catalin
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Besides, I can *guarantee* you that Costin won't like several aspects of
> > the org.apache.catalina.Store interface, because it has dependencies on
> > the other Catalina internal interfaces :-).
>
> You know me very well :-)
>
> Yes, I think
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Typos...
>
> > That doesn't mean 3.3 _modules_ are restricted in any way to JDK1.1.
> > Tomcat has already at least 2 modules that are JDK1.2 compatible.
>
> Are using JDK1.2 specific features.
>
>
> >
> > The restriction ( the way I und
Typos...
> That doesn't mean 3.3 _modules_ are restricted in any way to JDK1.1.
> Tomcat has already at least 2 modules that are JDK1.2 compatible.
Are using JDK1.2 specific features.
>
> The restriction ( the way I understand it at least ) is that tomcat4
> should provide a (basic) se
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> 3.3 wants to maintain JDK 1.1 compatibility -- at least that's the last I
> heard; maybe attitudes are changing.
My attitude is changing indeed - I would like to propose J2ME
compatibility for tomcat 3.3 :-)
( the only problem is one class that
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> What about having the session store stuff used also in
> Tomcat 3.2 / 3.3 .
>
3.2 is in maintenance mode, and should stay that way. It doesn't need
persistent sessions at all.
3.3 wants to maintain JDK 1.1 compatibility -- at least that's the last
: 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-Original Message-
>From: Bip Thelin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 9:02 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Store Proposal
>
>
>We've had some issues with the background threads, expiration
&
Bip Thelin typed the following on 06:26 PM 4/21/2001 -0700
>Kief Morris wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Great - can you provide these patches as file attachments? They came in the
>> body of your message, which is very difficult to reliably apply to the
>sources.
>
>Attached is the files, the CustomOb
Kief Morris wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Great - can you provide these patches as file attachments? They came in the
> body of your message, which is very difficult to reliably apply to the sources.
Attached is the files, the CustomObjectInputstream goes in the util dir.
..bip
StoreFiles.zip
Bip Thelin typed the following on 12:01 PM 4/20/2001 -0700
>We've had some issues with the background threads, expiration and stuff so I
>migrated some of the common stuff into a StoreBase and had JDBCStore and
>FileStore
>extend it and have the opportunity to implement it's own processexpires an
We've had some issues with the background threads, expiration and stuff so I
migrated some of the common stuff into a StoreBase and had JDBCStore and FileStore
extend it and have the opportunity to implement it's own processexpires and some
other methods. The code is attatched. I've also implement
11 matches
Mail list logo
