Amy Roh wrote:
Are you using modeler 1.1? You need to have the latest modeler change for
the fix - org.apache.commons.modeler.BaseModelMBean 1.25. The fix went in
after 1.1 release. How about that for sneaky ;-) All should be good if
you have the latest BaseModelMBean. :-)
The diff seems to v
Are you using modeler 1.1? You need to have the latest modeler change for
the fix - org.apache.commons.modeler.BaseModelMBean 1.25. The fix went in
after 1.1 release. How about that for sneaky ;-) All should be good if
you have the latest BaseModelMBean. :-)
Amy
> Yes, it says it returns a
Amy Roh wrote:
Would it be possible to wait until tomorrow to start doing that (ie,
after I tag 5.0.19) ?
Sure, it can wait. I wasn't planning on doing it right away. I need to see
whether we can accomplish this first - it'll be very nice to do so.
BTW, another problem: on StandardContext and
ebruary 12, 2004 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: Remote Access using JSR 160
> Would it be possible to wait until tomorrow to start doing that (ie,
> after I tag 5.0.19) ?
Sure, it can wait. I wasn't planning on doing it right away. I need to see
whether we can accomplish this first - it'l
> Would it be possible to wait until tomorrow to start doing that (ie,
> after I tag 5.0.19) ?
Sure, it can wait. I wasn't planning on doing it right away. I need to see
whether we can accomplish this first - it'll be very nice to do so.
> BTW, another problem: on StandardContext and StandardWr
-1 for doing it now,
+0 to do it after tag and after next stable release.
Filip
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: Remot
Amy Roh wrote:
Not all Tomcat 5 MBeans are serializable and I think we should make all our
exposed MBeans serializable if we want to support remote access to
MBeanServer using JSR 160. We'll need to modify Tomcat MBeans to only have
serializable attributes and return types.
Comments?
That's not co
Howdy,
>Not all Tomcat 5 MBeans are serializable and I think we should make all
our
>exposed MBeans serializable if we want to support remote access to
>MBeanServer using JSR 160. We'll need to modify Tomcat MBeans to only
have
>serializable attributes and return types.
>
>Comments?
+1, willing
Not all Tomcat 5 MBeans are serializable and I think we should make all our
exposed MBeans serializable if we want to support remote access to
MBeanServer using JSR 160. We'll need to modify Tomcat MBeans to only have
serializable attributes and return types.
Comments?
Thanks,
Amy
