Re: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

jean-frederic clere wrote: > Henri Gomez wrote: >> Costin Manolache wrote: >> >>> Henri Gomez wrote: >>> >>> Costin Manolache wrote: > Henri Gomez wrote: > > > >> If everybody agree, what about removing src/native for tomcat 3.3.2 ? > > > > > +1

Re: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

Henri Gomez wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: >> Henri Gomez wrote: >> >> >>>Costin Manolache wrote: >>> Henri Gomez wrote: >If everybody agree, what about removing src/native for tomcat 3.3.2 ? +1 >>> >>>Yes or no ? >> >> >> >> Actually, another

Re: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

Henri Gomez wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: > >> Henri Gomez wrote: >> >> >>> Costin Manolache wrote: >>> Henri Gomez wrote: > If everybody agree, what about removing src/native for tomcat 3.3.2 ? +1 >>> >>> Yes or no ? >> >> >> >> >> Actuall

Re: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

Costin Manolache wrote: > Henri Gomez wrote: > > >>Costin Manolache wrote: >> >>>Henri Gomez wrote: >>> >>> >>> If everybody agree, what about removing src/native for tomcat 3.3.2 ? >>> >>> >>> >>>+1 >>> >> >>Yes or no ? > > > > Actually, another way is to move mod_jserv in j-t-c, and rem

Re: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

Henri Gomez wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: >> Henri Gomez wrote: >> >> >>>If everybody agree, what about removing src/native for tomcat 3.3.2 ? >> >> >> >> +1 >> > > Yes or no ? Actually, another way is to move mod_jserv in j-t-c, and remove src/native completely. -- Costin -- To

Re: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

Henri Gomez wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: >> Henri Gomez wrote: >> >> >>>If everybody agree, what about removing src/native for tomcat 3.3.2 ? >> >> >> >> +1 >> > > Yes or no ? Yes, remove mod_jk related stuff. I think it would be a good idea to keep mod_jserv - it is frozen from a l

Re: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

Costin Manolache wrote: > Henri Gomez wrote: > > >>Larry Isaacs wrote: >> >>>Now that mod_jk 1.2.0 is released, I'm fine with this. >> >>Nota, that it will remove also mod_jserv > > > Please don't :-) > > I know people still using it. Probably the one in java-jserv can be > used as well

Re: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

Costin Manolache wrote: > Henri Gomez wrote: > > >>If everybody agree, what about removing src/native for tomcat 3.3.2 ? > > > > +1 > Yes or no ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

Henri Gomez wrote: > If everybody agree, what about removing src/native for tomcat 3.3.2 ? +1 -- Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

Henri Gomez wrote: > Larry Isaacs wrote: >> Now that mod_jk 1.2.0 is released, I'm fine with this. > > Nota, that it will remove also mod_jserv Please don't :-) I know people still using it. Probably the one in java-jserv can be used as well ( well, we should do a diff first ). -- Cos

Re: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

+1 Bojan On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 19:13, Henri Gomez wrote: > If everybody agree, what about removing src/native for tomcat 3.3.2 ? > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > For additional commands, e-mail: > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

> -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 8:02 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup > > > Larry Isaacs wrote: > > Now that mod_jk 1.2.0 is released, I'm fine

Re: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

Larry Isaacs wrote: > Now that mod_jk 1.2.0 is released, I'm fine with this. Nota, that it will remove also mod_jserv -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

Now that mod_jk 1.2.0 is released, I'm fine with this. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup > > > If everybody agree, what about removing src