Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So far the same code you wrote works with SIGHUP, SIGKILL and SIGUSR?...
Uh uh uh... So damn stupid Pier :) Now I get it, it's not because of
SIGSEGV, but it's because a SIGSEGV is raised when the VM is created... :)
Now I remember when I saw that m
Daniel Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Another strange problem occurs if you replace this line by
> system("uname -a");
>
> after executing system() the JVM loading is blocked (in a sigsuspend I think).
>
> Could you help me on this please ?
Hehehe :) You're going down hard-core on the VM
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem under Linux loading the JVM since before I set a Handler to
> catch SIGSEGV signals. It seems that this causes some troubles when the JVM
> is loaded. This seems due to threads in Java. I saw several post from
> yourself about this topic.
Long ago... Did you tried w
