Re: Minimal HOWTO for jk2 2.0.4 - Was: [Fwd: Releasing JK 2.0.4]

t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 9:53 PM Subject: Re: Re: Minimal HOWTO for jk2 2.0.4 - Was: [Fwd: Releasing JK 2.0.4] --- Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <> I would like to see some feedback from those admins who have to inst

Re: Re: Minimal HOWTO for jk2 2.0.4 - Was: [Fwd: Releasing JK 2.0.4]

way people who have suggestions for documentation can just add it? Do WIKIs exist in the ASF? Tim - Original Message - From: "Daniel Savard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 9:53 PM Subject: Re: Re: Minimal HOWTO for

Re: Re: Minimal HOWTO for jk2 2.0.4 - Was: [Fwd: Releasing JK 2.0.4]

>--- Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ><> >>I would like to see some >> feedback from those admins who have to install the connectors what >they would >> prefer. > >A quick start covering: >- What to download >- What to compile >- Compatible Apache versions >- Which folder to copy files int

Re: Minimal HOWTO for jk2 2.0.4 - proposal

Hi Kurt, >> hmm, since we have fixed recently the hooks it shouldnt matter anymore >> where you load mod_jk2; > D'oh!. ;-) Out of habbit I always do the LoadModule in the DSO section, > but you're right it shouldn't matter. in theory what really happens will tell us BugZilla after we have 2.0.

Re: Minimal HOWTO for jk2 2.0.4 - proposal

From: "Guenter Knauf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi Kurt, > > I like the idea of this and the text is good. I would think you would need > > to cover how to install if the user is using a > > non-default directory structure. I'm not sure if its common on Netware and > > W32, but the *BSD's each use diff

Re: Minimal HOWTO for jk2 2.0.4 - proposal

Hi Kurt, > I like the idea of this and the text is good. I would think you would need > to cover how to install if the user is using a > non-default directory structure. I'm not sure if its common on Netware and > W32, but the *BSD's each use different locations for conf > and modules. right, that'

Re: Minimal HOWTO for jk2 2.0.4 - proposal

From: "Guenter Knauf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi, > Here are the HOWTOs I use for binary distributions: > > > NetWare: > > This is a binary package of mod_jk2. If you have > installed Apache2 to the default location /Apache2 then > simp

Re: Minimal HOWTO for jk2 2.0.4 - proposal

Hi, > How did users see documentation in tomcat-docs ? after this simple setup you are at once able to browse the tomcat-docs through the connector; see Mladen's minimal wokers2.properties file... Guenter. - To unsubscribe, e

Re: Minimal HOWTO for jk2 2.0.4 - proposal

Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi, Here are the HOWTOs I use for binary distributions: NetWare: This is a binary package of mod_jk2. If you have installed Apache2 to the default location /Apache2 then simply extract this archive directly to the

Re: Minimal HOWTO for jk2 2.0.4 - Was: [Fwd: Releasing JK 2.0.4]

--- Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <> >I would like to see some > feedback from those admins who have to install the connectors what they would > prefer. A quick start covering: - What to download - What to compile - Compatible Apache versions - Which folder to copy files into - What en

Re: Minimal HOWTO for jk2 2.0.4 - Was: [Fwd: Releasing JK 2.0.4]

Hi all, probably now I get the -1's back, but nevertheless I'll give it a try...! > Did some of you, JFC, Mladen, Guenter, Kurt, Norm could works on > a little HOWTO (text based will be suffisant) for jk2, explaining > how to set up jk2 in IIS and Apache 2 web-servers ? > It could be added to the

Re: Minimal HOWTO for jk2 2.0.4 - Was: [Fwd: Releasing JK 2.0.4]

Mladen Turk wrote: -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez Did some of you, JFC, Mladen, Guenter, Kurt, Norm could works on a little HOWTO (text based will be suffisant) for jk2, explaining how to set up jk2 in IIS and Apache 2 web-servers ? It could be added to the release and will he

RE: Minimal HOWTO for jk2 2.0.4 - Was: [Fwd: Releasing JK 2.0.4]

> -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez > > Did some of you, JFC, Mladen, Guenter, Kurt, Norm could works > on a little HOWTO (text based will be suffisant) for jk2, > explaining how to set up jk2 in IIS and Apache 2 web-servers ? > > It could be added to the release and will help r

RE: Minimal server.xml

Tomcat Developers List >Subject: Re: Minimal server.xml > >On logging: > >The suggested server-minimal.xml does only contain a Logging-tag that >makes no use of the special features (thus only logging to catalina.out, >making the tag redundant, nicht Wahr?). > >To compens

Re: Minimal server.xml

On logging: The suggested server-minimal.xml does only contain a Logging-tag that makes no use of the special features (thus only logging to catalina.out, making the tag redundant, nicht Wahr?). To compensate for the lack of "out of the box" features, we should add brief HOW-TO:s. I volunteer

Re: Minimal server.xml

Dan Johnsson wrote: I would even suggest distribute something like this as the ordinary server.xml, and rename the other as server-examples.xml. /.../ So examples are great, but I think they should be elsewhere than in the production config file. Remy Maucherat wrote: This does sound like vallid

Re: Minimal server.xml

I am +1 on this as well. Again, I recommend removing the Logging tag. Tomcat's ability to log to many different places (Rolling logs for each web applications, etc...) is a good thing for an enterprise product, but most newbies just want to see the stack trace that corresponds with an error page

Re: Minimal server.xml

Dan Johnsson wrote: +1 I would even suggest distribute something like this as the ordinary server.xml, and rename the other as server-examples.xml. Why? I do most of my tomcat-work with "initial" users, i e either students taking classes or people doing their first installation. They are not h

Re: Minimal server.xml

+1 I would even suggest distribute something like this as the ordinary server.xml, and rename the other as server-examples.xml. Why? I do most of my tomcat-work with "initial" users, i e either students taking classes or people doing their first installation. They are not helped by the "rich"

Re: Minimal server.xml

+1 You can also remove the xmlValidation="false" xmlNamespaceAware="false", since they are optionals. -- Jeanfrancois Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, IMHO the server.xml that comes with tomcat by default ($CATALINA_HOME/conf/server.xml) is nice in that it provides many comments and examples. But I t

Re: Minimal server.xml

Sounds like a good idea to me. I would recommend removing the "Logger" and just letting the output go into catalina.out -bob On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 12:18, Shapira, Yoav wrote: > Hi, > IMHO the server.xml that comes with tomcat by default > ($CATALINA_HOME/conf/server.xml) is nice in that it prov

Re: Minimal or Modular it's up to you

on 2002/12/10 1:46 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, so just take the tomcat core and don't install/activate > the jasper module. Exactly. -jon -- StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment 314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco http://studioz.tv/ -- To unsubscribe

Re: Minimal or Modular it's up to you

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/10 1:19 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What Jon and Pier want is a minimal distribution of Tomcat 5. No. What I want is a distribution of a JSR 154 container with nothing more than the RI of JSR 154. Period. Ok, so just take the tomcat core

Re: Minimal or Modular it's up to you

on 2002/12/10 1:19 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What Jon and Pier want is a minimal distribution of > Tomcat 5. No. What I want is a distribution of a JSR 154 container with nothing more than the RI of JSR 154. Period. -jon -- StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment 314 11t

Re: minimal

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > What people are saying is that they would like A distribution of Tomcat > without Jasper. We are not saying all distributions of Tomcat should not > include Jasper, only A distribution. > > It has nothing to do with "I don't like it so nobody should use it." It > simply

Re: minimal

Glenn Nielsen wrote: The minimal will need some form of minimal docs, perhaps just the config reference as an HTML file? Or an HTML with a small message ("hi, this is mini-tomcat, please go online for the full docs") a metarefresh to the Tomcat website ? Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: minimal

on 2002/12/6 7:19 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shapira, Yoav wrote: > >> Hi, >> - jasper ( at least jasper runtime - but probably the whole thing ). >>> >>> Now that we have JSR 154 and JSR 153, can't we make a distribution of >>> Tomcat >>> that does not include Jas

RE: minimal

Shapira, Yoav wrote: > Hi, > >>> - jasper ( at least jasper runtime - but probably the whole thing ). >> >>Now that we have JSR 154 and JSR 153, can't we make a distribution of >>Tomcat >>that does not include Jasper? That would rock. =) > > Big time +1 on that. I don't use Jasper/JSP pages at

Re: minimal

The minimal will need some form of minimal docs, perhaps just the config reference as an HTML file? Glenn Costin Manolache wrote: Another try: Required libs: - JMX - JAAS - JNDI - digester ( and beanutils, collections it needs ). - modeler - ant ( required by jasper runtime and startup ) - com

RE: minimal

Hi, >> - jasper ( at least jasper runtime - but probably the whole thing ). > >Now that we have JSR 154 and JSR 153, can't we make a distribution of >Tomcat >that does not include Jasper? That would rock. =) Big time +1 on that. I don't use Jasper/JSP pages at all, and while it's not a big hindr

Re: minimal

on 2002/12/5 11:51 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - jasper ( at least jasper runtime - but probably the whole thing ). Now that we have JSR 154 and JSR 153, can't we make a distribution of Tomcat that does not include Jasper? That would rock. =) -jon -- StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/N

Re: minimal

on 2002/12/5 10:34 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And components to be included in minimal: > - catalina > - coyote > - tomcat-util > - http11/jk2 > - all valves/etc that are required for tomcat to operate. > - naming I'm 100% +1 on a minimal distribution of Tomcat 4 that onl

Re: minimal

Another try: Required libs: - JMX - JAAS - JNDI - digester ( and beanutils, collections it needs ). - modeler - ant ( required by jasper runtime and startup ) - commons-logging When/if the JNDI-based abstraction of config files is ready we'll not need digester - but most likely it'll still be req

Re: minimal

Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: Yep. There is a couple of Realm/Authenticator that can be optional (the default one should stay in the core module) Speaking of defaults: - Should we make the JAAS realm the default ? Or at least include it in th

Re: minimal

Costin Manolache wrote: Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: Yep. There is a couple of Realm/Authenticator that can be optional (the default one should stay in the core module) Speaking of defaults: - Should we make the JAAS realm the default ? Or at least include it in the core ? In my opinion the