From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Kurt Miller wrote:
> > Thanks to jean-frederic clere for input on this. Ok, here goes again...
;-)
> >
> > Attached is a patch that makes the following changes for building jk2
via
> > configure and make:
> >
> > 1) Introduces a new configure argume
jean-frederic clere a écrit :
Kurt Miller wrote:
Thanks to jean-frederic clere for input on this. Ok, here goes
again... ;-)
Attached is a patch that makes the following changes for building jk2 via
configure and make:
1) Introduces a new configure argument called
--enable-apr-threads= for
use
Kurt Miller wrote:
Thanks to jean-frederic clere for input on this. Ok, here goes again... ;-)
Attached is a patch that makes the following changes for building jk2 via
configure and make:
1) Introduces a new configure argument called --enable-apr-threads= for
use with --with-apr. This argument al
From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Kurt Miller wrote:
> > Before I start making a patch, I'd like to make sure I've got the new
> > behavior nailed down...
> >
> > It seems like there is some conflicting stuff going on. Apr may need to
be
> > configured without threads at times (with
From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ok,
>
> Who is handling today the many configure/m4 suggestions ?
>
> BTW, I'm using Redhat 9.0 and the apr-config is available so it should
> be a common situation even when it's a distro and not by hand build
>
Hi Henri,
I'm about completed with the pat
Ok,
Who is handling today the many configure/m4 suggestions ?
BTW, I'm using Redhat 9.0 and the apr-config is available so it should
be a common situation even when it's a distro and not by hand build
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Kurt Miller wrote:
From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kurt Miller wrote:
Ok thanks for the heads up, I've look briefly at wa_apr.m4 now. I've got
a
question or two I think there are two cases:
1) when --with-apr is specified
2) when --with-apr-include and --with-apr-lib are spe
From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Kurt Miller wrote:
> > Ok thanks for the heads up, I've look briefly at wa_apr.m4 now. I've got
a
> > question or two I think there are two cases:
> >
> > 1) when --with-apr is specified
> > 2) when --with-apr-include and --with-apr-lib are spec
Kurt Miller wrote:
From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote:
Kurt Miller wrote:
Checking out the apache2 makefile it looks like apr-0 is right. Here's
a revised
patch (I missed a spot).
Index: jk/support/jk_apr.m4
===
From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote:
> > Kurt Miller wrote:
> >
> >> Checking out the apache2 makefile it looks like apr-0 is right. Here's
> >> a revised
> >> patch (I missed a spot).
> >>
> >> Index: jk/support/jk_apr.m4
> >> ==
I'm not receiving this messages from the list, i'll try to unsubscribe
them anyway..
Saludos,
Ignacio J. Ortega
> -Original Message-
> From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
Does someone else got those kind of messages?
If yes could the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] be removed from the tomcat-dev list?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
BTW: I think [EMAIL PROTECTED] should also be removed...
--- Begin Message ---
AUTOMATED MESSAGE DO NOT REPLY
--
The e-ma
Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote:
Kurt Miller wrote:
Checking out the apache2 makefile it looks like apr-0 is right. Here's
a revised
patch (I missed a spot).
Index: jk/support/jk_apr.m4
===
RCS file:
/home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-conne
Kurt Miller wrote:
Checking out the apache2 makefile it looks like apr-0 is right. Here's a revised
patch (I missed a spot).
Index: jk/support/jk_apr.m4
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/support/jk_apr.m4,v
ret
Checking out the apache2 makefile it looks like apr-0 is right. Here's a revised
patch (I missed a spot).
Index: jk/support/jk_apr.m4
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/support/jk_apr.m4,v
retrieving revision 1
15 matches
Mail list logo
