On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:29:19PM +0100, Henri Gomez wrote:
> jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
> >jean-frederic clere wrote:
> >
> >>Henri Gomez wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>jean-frederic clere wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> Henri Gomez wrote:
>
>
>
> >Glenn Nielsen wrote:
> >
> >
Henri Gomez wrote:
> jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
>> jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>
>>> Henri Gomez wrote:
>>>
>>>
jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
>
>
>
>> Glenn Nielsen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Henri,
>>>
>>> It is h
jean-frederic clere wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution
jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
>
>>jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Henri Gomez wrote:
>>>
>>>
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
>Henri,
>
>It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
>priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced t
Sorry, it was an error answering this email
Ramon Pons wrote:
Ok, you are rigth. In a few minutes will be ready.
Regards,
Ramon
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. I
Ok, you are rigth. In a few minutes will be ready.
Regards,
Ramon
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other a
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until
Henri Gomez wrote:
> jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
>> Henri Gomez wrote:
>>
>>> Glenn Nielsen wrote:
>>>
>>>
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until we have
an extensive test suite to test use of mod_
Henri Gomez wrote:
> Glenn Nielsen wrote:
>
>> Henri,
>>
>> It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
>> priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
>> the best solution for this will not be found until we have
>> an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 w
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until we have
an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 with other
modules. So if a change is ma
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until we have
an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 with other
modules. So if a change is mad
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until we have
an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 with other
modules. So if a change is made we can make sure us
Henri Gomez wrote:
> Hi Glenn and others :)
>
> I see in jk that we're using :
>
> ap_hook_translate_name(jk_translate,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
>
> and now in jk2 :
>
> static const char * const aszPre[] = { "mod_rewrite.c", NULL };
> ap_hook_translate_name(jk2_translate, aszPre, NULL, APR_H
14 matches
Mail list logo
