omcat's behavior in this respect because it uses Tomcat code
for this) should be presumed to be correct.
Craig McClanahan
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Eddie Bush wrote:
> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:03:54 -0500
> From: Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Developers L
Look at what Bob posted. I'd listen to the spec before I listened to
anyone else - hold that up to their nose. It's black and white.
Alex Kachanov wrote:
>-Original Message-
>From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: Re: g
l Message-
From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 y| 2002 s. 14:45
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: getRequestURI()
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: getRequestURI()
>> Ah - now I feel stupid. I was thinking he was saying encodeURL didn't
>> put it there. According to what your interpretation is he things
>>
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:34 PM
Subject: Re: getRequestURI()
> Hum, it does look like the spec is a bit schizophrenic here.
Ah - now I feel stupid. I was thinking he was saying encodeURL didn't
put it there. According to what your interpretation is he things
getRequestURI doesn't get it back. :-/ I'll buy that - especially since
you're quoting it from the docs ;-) *feels stupid*
Is it a usage question rather than an i
Hum, it does look like the spec is a bit schizophrenic here. The
;jessionid= isn't part of the requestURI in section 4.4:
It is important to note that, except for URL encoding differences between
the
request URI and the path parts, the following equation is always true:
requestURI = contextPath
