DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-Original Message-
>From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 4:47 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: fdatasync in mod_jk
>
>
>GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>>
>> I'm strongly to remove th
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> I'm strongly to remove the fdatasync in mod_jk since :
>
> - it slow down too much Apache when running in DEBUG/TRACE mode
> - not very portable (not PORTABLE/FREEBSD/WIN32)
And probably others platforms because it needs _POSIX_SYNCHRONIZED_IO
I do not think that mod_jk
If my vote counts +1 since we saw how dramatic performance goes down.
As far as I can see from the Solaris documentation (and the system
behaviour) fdatasync really writes to the physical disk. It would be
enough to flush file buffers to the file system (which will be cached in
modern operati
