[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 1/25/2004 5:16 AM:
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.81
retrieving revision 1.82
diff -u -r1.81 -r1.82
@@ -1066,6 +1105,8 @@
[4.1.27] #21984
HandlerReqest:
Fix potential Dos condition
>GLIBC 2.2 / Linux 2.4 users should also define an environment variable:
>export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5
> +
> +Additionally, Redhat 9.0 users should use the same setting, to avoid
> stability +problems.
Being a bit pedantic: it's not "Redhat 9.0", it's "Red Hat Linux 9".
--
Pedro Mor
Ok, my patches for 4.1.25 are now in.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 10:42 PM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
> billbarker2003/06/30 22:42:00
>
> Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remm2003/03/15 22:15:38
Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Log:
- Status update.
Revision ChangesPath
1.66 +7 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Index: RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
==
you're fast. ;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remm2003/03/14 10:35:22
Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Log:
- Status update.
Revision ChangesPath
1.65 +9 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Index: RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
===
You read it correctly. AFAIK, all previous versions of jasper
held on to objects which it no longer needed after a JSP compile.
Glenn
Aditya wrote:
Although bug 15845 is listed as being for 4.1.19, it looks like it
affected Jasper2 even before that -- or am I reading the commit
message wrong?
T
Although bug 15845 is listed as being for 4.1.19, it looks like it
affected Jasper2 even before that -- or am I reading the commit
message wrong?
Thanks,
Adi
> On 26 Jan 2003 19:00:19 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> glenn 2003/01/26 11:00:19
> Modified: . RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt Log: Update re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> remm2002/09/05 02:00:11
>
> Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
> Log:
> - Update release notes.
> - Mention the admin webapp as beta (instead of alpha). I personally think
> it's good/polished enough to be called a beta. Glenn ?
>
Beta
