I am adequately discouraged from trying to sell you additions to
facilitate JNI usage.
I trust that you are in no hurry to demolish common.
I could send along a convincing sob story as to why I really don't have
a practical alternative to JNI, but I doubt that anyone would find it
terribly sympat
tly, and that's
when conflicts and -1's (binding vetoes on proposed code changes) arise.
Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
>-Original Message-
>From: Benson Margulies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 3:32 PM
>To: Tomcat Developers Lis
Yoav,
Just out of curiosity, what would you say to us poor JNI addicts?
--benson
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;s not just up to me ;)
Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
>-Original Message-
>From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:45 AM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: Re: Two modest proposals about common\lib
>
>Tim Funk
Sure enough, just what the doctor ordered. Time to play tech writer again.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Krüger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:23 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Two modest proposals about common\lib
look at common.loader
look at common.loader, server.loader and shared.loader in
catalina.properties. That's what we use for the described purpose.
Benson Margulies wrote:
Remy,
Can you send me a doc reference to the relevant properties? Maybe a howto is in order
here. If there's already a capability to append lib/cla
--Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:45 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Two modest proposals about common\lib
Tim Funk wrote:
> I've been pondering something similar. (I just never got around to
> vocalizing it
Tim Funk wrote:
I've been pondering something similar. (I just never got around to
vocalizing it) My preference is to introduce common/usr_lib (and
server/usr_lib)(This name is horrible, but you get the idea)
The usr_lib dirs would be in the same classloader as common/lib (or
server/lib) and wo
I've been pondering something similar. (I just never got around to vocalizing
it) My preference is to introduce common/usr_lib (and server/usr_lib)(This
name is horrible, but you get the idea)
The usr_lib dirs would be in the same classloader as common/lib (or
server/lib) and would contain user
i normally resolve this with symlinks. Means I can have 'my' common stuff like
database drivers
in any place I like. (ie in a versioned directory like
dbdrivers/database/version/jar
Kind regards
David Cassidy
10 matches
Mail list logo
