Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-16 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
kevin seguin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> However, since I just recently sold management on linux/apache/tomcat as our >> next gen platform, and I can put that on my desktop as well, it's not much >> skin off my nose if the connectors are suboptimal on NT. > > unfortunately, not all managem

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-16 Thread kevin seguin
> > However, since I just recently sold management on linux/apache/tomcat as our > next gen platform, and I can put that on my desktop as well, it's not much > skin off my nose if the connectors are suboptimal on NT. > unfortunately, not all management is as enlightened as yours appears to be

RE: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-16 Thread Steve Downey
management on linux/apache/tomcat as our next gen platform, and I can put that on my desktop as well, it's not much skin off my nose if the connectors are suboptimal on NT. > -Original Message- > From: kevin seguin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 10:00

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-15 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
kevin seguin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> So we have 2 cygwin (amy+jon) and 1 msvc (kevin)... I hoped to have more >> feedback... I'll start with cygwin (since I can get it for free) >> > > does it really matter much? it should build with both cygwin and msvc, > right? you might just ha

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-15 Thread Christopher Cain
For what it's worth, I prefer Cygwin. > So we have 2 cygwin (amy+jon) and 1 msvc (kevin)... I hoped to have more > feedback... I'll start with cygwin (since I can get it for free) > > Pier

RE: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>I ask mostly because I've put a lot of effort into cleaning up and >documenting that code, and I hope that it is now much more >workable. Your documentation is a great help in extending the jk in jakarta-tomcat-connectors to add ajp14 support. I'll try to also comments my code to help it bei

RE: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-15 Thread Reilly, John
:07 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff > > > Reilly, John at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi, > > I had the same problem but I'm using a heavily modified > Redhat 6.1 system so > > that seems to indicate that

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-15 Thread Dan Milstein
Pier, If you want to keep the mod_webapp stuff in the TC 4.x branch, I respect that (I'm not as big a proponent of the new j-t-c project as Henri). So I guess that makes me +0 on the question you posed to the list. However, I did want to ask you about this: > > Could you tell us what's the pro

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-15 Thread kevin seguin
> > So we have 2 cygwin (amy+jon) and 1 msvc (kevin)... I hoped to have more > feedback... I'll start with cygwin (since I can get it for free) > does it really matter much? it should build with both cygwin and msvc, right? you might just have different makefiles for the two. -kevin.

RE: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>So we have 2 cygwin (amy+jon) and 1 msvc (kevin)... I hoped to >have more feedback... msvc is the de-facto reference in Windows World +1 for msvc

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-15 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
Amy Roh at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I prefer Cygwin personally. Thanks, Pier! So we have 2 cygwin (amy+jon) and 1 msvc (kevin)... I hoped to have more feedback... I'll start with cygwin (since I can get it for free) Pier

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-15 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Who asked you to drop your code ?) Uh.. A lot of people, I remember... > I was asking for import of the wa code in > jakarta-tomcat-connectors. Hm... A change worth less than zero... > Could you tell us what's the problem with JK ? > A sort of 'not

RE: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> You were invited with Pier last week and there is still no >> anwsers :) > >Was I? Whops, didn't notice... Sorry... What should I do? >Throw away all my >code and start working on JK? Who asked you to drop your code ?) I was asking for import of the wa code in jakarta-tomcat-connectors. C

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-15 Thread jean-frederic clere
"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote: > > GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Will you also Jon, contribute to jakarta-tomcat-connectors ? > > > > You were invited with Pier last week and there is still no > > anwsers :) > > Was I? Whops, didn't notice... Sorry... What should I do? Throw away al

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-14 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
Reilly, John at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > I had the same problem but I'm using a heavily modified Redhat 6.1 system so > that seems to indicate that its not limited to a glibc2.2 problem. > Everything compiled fine, but when starting up httpd it gave the "undefined > symbol: pthread_create

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-14 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Will you also Jon, contribute to jakarta-tomcat-connectors ? > > You were invited with Pier last week and there is still no > anwsers :) Was I? Whops, didn't notice... Sorry... What should I do? Throw away all my code and start working on JK? I love wor

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-14 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm pleased to see how the thing moved in mod_webapp since > the jakarta-tomcat-connectors is in CVS and after all the > AJP14 discussion. > > Did we'll see another brake in connector side ? Nope, you saw a move in the mod_webapp stuff when Pier found a

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-14 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > on 5/13/01 10:43 AM, "Pier P. Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hmm... Ok, but AFAIK apxs exists also in Apache 2.0, which is the module I'm >> writing right now... Could I call it --with-apxs2 ??? How does that sound? > > No need. That is the

RE: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-14 Thread Steve Downey
ED] > Subject: Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff > > > kevin seguin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> Hmm... Ok, but AFAIK apxs exists also in Apache 2.0, which > is the module I'm > >> writing right now... > > > > so... iis is

RE: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-14 Thread Reilly, John
Hi, I had the same problem but I'm using a heavily modified Redhat 6.1 system so that seems to indicate that its not limited to a glibc2.2 problem. Everything compiled fine, but when starting up httpd it gave the "undefined symbol: pthread_create" error as below. I have libpthread installed in /

RE: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
: 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 10:07 PM >To: tomcat-dev >Subject: Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff > > >on 5/13/01 10:43 AM, "Pier P. Fumagalli" &

RE: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: Pier P. Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 8:01 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Trying New Connectors Buil

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-13 Thread Jon Stevens
on 5/13/01 10:43 AM, "Pier P. Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm... Ok, but AFAIK apxs exists also in Apache 2.0, which is the module I'm > writing right now... Could I call it --with-apxs2 ??? How does that sound? No need. That is the point of --with-apxs[=FILE]... you can optionally p

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-13 Thread Jon Stevens
on 5/13/01 10:53 AM, "Amy Roh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I prefer Cygwin personally. Thanks, Pier! > > Amy +1 I know that MSVC is probably "nicer", but with cygwin more people can use it, it is free, etc... This was a problem with Jserv...only people with MSVC could compile it. That sucke

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-13 Thread Amy Roh
> kevin seguin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> Hmm... Ok, but AFAIK apxs exists also in Apache 2.0, which is the module I'm > >> writing right now... > > > > so... iis is next, right ;-) > > Yes, IIS is next, I just need to install Win2K on my only Intel box I have. > It's a very old Pentium

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-13 Thread kevin seguin
"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote: > > kevin seguin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> Hmm... Ok, but AFAIK apxs exists also in Apache 2.0, which is the module I'm > >> writing right now... > > > > so... iis is next, right ;-) > > Yes, IIS is next, I just need to install Win2K on my only Intel box I h

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-13 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
kevin seguin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hmm... Ok, but AFAIK apxs exists also in Apache 2.0, which is the module I'm >> writing right now... > > so... iis is next, right ;-) Yes, IIS is next, I just need to install Win2K on my only Intel box I have. It's a very old Pentium 366 and I hope

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-13 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The autoconf stuff is a total mystery to me, but here's my experience so > far. > > Platform: Red Hat Linux 7.1 > > Problem 1 - Can't find APXS: > Problem 2 - Can't compile mod_webapp: Ok, this should have been fixed by Jon. I don't have a L

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-13 Thread kevin seguin
> > Hmm... Ok, but AFAIK apxs exists also in Apache 2.0, which is the module I'm > writing right now... so... iis is next, right ;-)

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-13 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > on 5/12/01 12:19 PM, "Jack Lauman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Configured the connectors directory: >> >> ./configure --prefix=/usr >> --enable-DEAPI \ >> --with-apache=/usr/sbin \ (apxs lives here) >> --with-apr=/usr/java/apr \ >> --libexecdir=/us

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-12 Thread Jon Stevens
on 5/12/01 12:19 PM, "Jack Lauman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Configured the connectors directory: > > ./configure --prefix=/usr > --enable-DEAPI \ > --with-apache=/usr/sbin \ (apxs lives here) > --with-apr=/usr/java/apr \ > --libexecdir=/usr/lib \ > --sysconfdir=/etc/httpd/conf You are usin

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-12 Thread Jon Stevens
on 5/12/01 9:55 AM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The autoconf stuff is a total mystery to me, but here's my experience so > far. > > Platform: Red Hat Linux 7.1 > > > Problem 1 - Can't find APXS: > > I tried "./configure --with-apr=/usr/local --with-apxs=x > > w

Re: Trying New Connectors Build Stuff

2001-05-12 Thread Jack Lauman
For those interested, here's how I got it to work: Platform: RedHat Linux7.0 OS: Linux 2.2.19 Apache ver: 1.3.19 (w/SSL 0.9.6a-2.8.3) Apache Dir: /var/lib/apache Conf dir: /etc/httpd/conf TOMCAT_HOME: /usr/java/tomcat Dowloaded apr and apr-util from cvs. Configured both with: ./configu