Re: tools.jar, javac and JDK 1.4b2

2001-10-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Deacon Marcus wrote: > Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 03:43:35 +0200 > From: Deacon Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: tools.jar, javac and JDK 1.4b2 > > Hi, > Are there any actions taken to convince Sun to leave tools.jar and

Re: Tools.jar

2001-01-24 Thread Matthew Dornquast
RE>another option is Jikes. Dare I say, better? I think most would agree. -Matthew - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Tools.jar

2001-01-24 Thread Sam Ruby
Glenn Twiggs wrote: > > I don't think that tools.jar is needed for "normal activity". > We redistribute Tomcat with the JRE and don't have any issues. > If you need tools.jar to compile JSPs, try pre-compiling them > and distributing the resulting .class files with your product. > If this is not a

RE: Tools.jar

2001-01-24 Thread Twiggs, Glenn
Title: Tools.jar Eitan,   I don't think that tools.jar is needed for "normal activity". We redistribute Tomcat with the JRE and don't have any issues. If you need tools.jar to compile JSPs, try pre-compiling them and distributing the resulting .class files with your product. If this is not an op

Re: Tools.jar

2001-01-23 Thread Michael Rimov
At 06:50 PM 1/23/2001 +0200, you wrote: >I have a license issue > >1. Sun JDK's license is for non commercial or production use >2. For Production and commercial use they give the JRE >3. Tools.jar is a part of the JDK and is missing from the JRE >4. Tomcat needs Tools.jar for it's normal activity