On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Jason Brittain wrote:
> Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>
> > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> >
> >> why not do iot in shared storage and implement SSI ? thats what the
> >> mod_jserv shm file was for...a shared hunk of disk store.
> >> -Ys-
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > T
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>
> > why not do iot in shared storage and implement SSI ? thats what the
> > mod_jserv shm file was for...a shared hunk of disk store.
> > -Ys-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This is certainly one valid approach. It wor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed the following on 10:35 AM 12/22/2000 +0200
...
>Mod_jk on each machine forward requests based on sessionID to the right
>tomcat (this is my patch to 3.2b7).
...
>THE NEW IDEA is, assuming all of what I have stated above is working. We can
>take apache out of the picture.
>H
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>
>> why not do iot in shared storage and implement SSI ? thats what the
>> mod_jserv shm file was for...a shared hunk of disk store.
>> -Ys-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> This is certainly one valid approach. It works for cases where the s
Shai,
I don't fully understand what you're proposing, and I want to make sure I do. It kind
of sounds like you're saying that the web server would be configured to point to a
single TC instance, and that that instance would then do load-balancing (and could
also have enough information to sen
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> why not do iot in shared storage and implement SSI ? thats what the
> mod_jserv shm file was for...a shared hunk of disk store.
> -Ys-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is certainly one valid approach. It works for cases where the servers are all
on the same machine. But yo
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Two weeks ago I posted note here saying I'm going to write patch for Tomcat
> > 3.2 to support redundancy, in manner of having session information stored
> > between reloads and shared between tomcat instances.
> > In order to support tomcat redu
icer
BRM Seed
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: 972-53-866-459
Office: 972-2-5891-459
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 14:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tomcat session replicator
Interesting subject, a farm of Apache behind a
Interesting subject, a farm of Apache behind a larger farm of Tomcats ?
Let me develop :
Could we have say a farm of X Apache connected to a farm of Y Tomcat where
Y = 2 * X or Y = 3 * X ?
Also could the session replicator be compatible with eventuals ACL/Crypto
in mod_jk/ajp protocols ?
"
]]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000
21:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat session
replicator
Shai,
I apologize for not responding to you
earlier ... substantive discussions are getting a little lost in the noise at
the moment.
For some reason
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> At ApacheCon Europe (it was also presented in Orlando last March, but I missed
> it then), there was a very interesting session by Theo Schlossnagle
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about the Backhand Project, which is focused on providing
> load balancing support for Apache as
Jason Brittain wrote:
> Hi guys..
>
> I'm one of the other folks that have voiced some desire to implement
> distributed sessions and distributed servlet container functionality in
> Tomcat (although I only want to work on 4.0!). I'd love to collaborate
> with others on the design and implementa
Hi guys..
I'm one of the other folks that have voiced some desire to implement
distributed sessions and distributed servlet container functionality in
Tomcat (although I only want to work on 4.0!). I'd love to collaborate
with others on the design and implementation. More below:
Craig R. McCl
> Two weeks ago I posted note here saying I'm going to write patch for Tomcat
> 3.2 to support redundancy, in manner of having session information stored
> between reloads and shared between tomcat instances.
> In order to support tomcat redundancy I thought on implementing that in two
> phases:
Shai,
I apologize for not responding to you earlier ... substantive discussions
are getting a little lost in the noise at the moment.
For some reason, my Netscape mail reader won't let me intersperse comments
-- so I've put them at the end.
I think I read into your earlier comment that you'd be
15 matches
Mail list logo
