Hi,
I don't think we should re-instate the old file: that's too complicated from an
IP perspective. Retain Remy's new file with it's easy IP handling, and give
Jason a nice thank you (but not copyright, as was made clear in the
legal-discuss archives) notice in either the file itself or our NOTICE
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List"
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: IP issues
> Having raised this in the legal-discuss mailing list, the result was
> that there is actually n
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
- Need to populate o.a.c.util.CharsetMapperDefault.properties
Options
1. Do nothing. Wait for patches to be submitted.
2. Re-instate the contents of the properties file based on Jason's
previous class and include appropriate text in the NOTICE file.
My o
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I think we're going nowhere. If the ASF doesn't make it clear that there
are no redistribution IP issues because of licensing pollution,
Isn't this exactly what the posts legal-discuss say? What hasn't been
said that needs to be said?
...everything we received from Sun for
Mark Thomas wrote:
Having raised this in the legal-discuss mailing list, the result was
that there is actually no issue to worry about here. See
http://mail-archives.eu.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200501.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for details.
With this in mind we need to consider what, i
Mark Thomas wrote:
Having raised this in the legal-discuss mailing list, the result was
that there is actually no issue to worry about here. See
http://mail-archives.eu.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200501.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for details.
With this in mind we need to consider what, i
Having raised this in the legal-discuss mailing list, the result was
that there is actually no issue to worry about here. See
http://mail-archives.eu.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200501.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for details.
With this in mind we need to consider what, if anything, to do no
Hej,
Nils Gustafsson har gått i pension. För Jobb-relaterade ärenden kontakta
Marlene Jegeborn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Sir/Madam
Nils Gustafsson has retired. Please contact Marlene Jegeborn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscri
Is it all cleared up now?
tia,
.V
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 to rewrite the code and go past this problem.
Since the consensus was on rewriting/removing, I have done the following:
- removed the locale to encoding list (which will have to be
reconstructed based on contributi
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:57:51 -0500, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
The image copyrights are easy; things need to be copyright to the ASF,
not to Sun. So they need fixing somehow.
It would be best for someone from Sun to actually do this work.
Jean-Francoi
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 to rewrite the code and go past this problem.
Since the consensus was on rewriting/removing, I have done the following:
- removed the locale to encoding list (which will have to be
reconstructed based on contributions); this opens up a relatively small
compatibility iss
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:58:14 -0800, Costin Manolache
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I fully agree. Doesn't matter how small a contribution is ( or looks at
> some later time ), keeping the reference to the author and whatever else
> the author wants to include is the right thing to do ( if the code
Jason Hunter wrote:
nor see why we need an exception for such a such a small amount of code.
You need an exception because (a) the code was included from a third
party codebase and (b) a lot of research and testing went into compiling
the map used by the mapper.
I can easily add an @author tag
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jason Hunter wrote:
I do have a CLA on file. Aren't members required to? :)
That code donation happened while Tomcat was still Sun internal and I
was helping Sun as a contractor. Those were the good old days before
I was burdened with the knowledge about IP rights that I'
Jason Hunter wrote:
I do have a CLA on file. Aren't members required to? :)
That code donation happened while Tomcat was still Sun internal and I
was helping Sun as a contractor. Those were the good old days before I
was burdened with the knowledge about IP rights that I've since acquired
(as
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:57:51 -0500, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> The image copyrights are easy; things need to be copyright to the ASF,
> not to Sun. So they need fixing somehow.
It would be best for someone from Sun to actually do this work.
Jean-Francois, could you make su
I do have a CLA on file. Aren't members required to? :)
That code donation happened while Tomcat was still Sun internal and I
was helping Sun as a contractor. Those were the good old days before I
was burdened with the knowledge about IP rights that I've since acquired
(as has Remy obviously)
Jason is correct, the attributions remain. I'll send along the last set
of guidelines I saw regarding attribution and licensing.
Brian
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Jason Hunter wrote:
I think it would be rude to remove the comments about where the source files
originated, as they were developed
(this is based on assumptions, so let me know if they are wrong Jason)
I must admit that I lack the experience to be sure of the correct action here.
The image copyrights are easy; things need to be copyright to the ASF,
not to Sun. So they need fixing somehow.
Jason's code is harder.
It doesn
I think it would be rude to remove the comments about where the source
files originated, as they were developed apart from Apache and have a
life on their own apart from Apache. Attribution is fair and proper.
However I did grant permission for Sun (and of course Apache) to license
the code un
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:40:25 +0100, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fixing the GIFs should be easy. How about the two Java files ? I would
> need an answer from Jason and Craig to see if I can safely remove the
> comments (otherwise we would have to reimplement these, right ?).
Soun
21 matches
Mail list logo
