Keith Wannamaker wrote:
The numbers were suspect because I was running 3.3 under
JBuilder but 4.0 externally, I'd imagine. I set up clean
tomcat trees and ran them outside of any test environment
and I get these numbers: (100 rqs/10 concurrent cx)
TC 4.0.6 | TC 3.3.2
amaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 9:49 PM
Subject: RE: Coyote/Http11 under load
> Same box, same app, same test, with Tomcat 4.0.6's http10 and 11 adaptor:
>
> coyote/http1137r
container between the tests.
I'm still investigating, but it may be easier for us to
move to 4.0.
Keith
| -Original Message-
| From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:remm@;apache.org]
| Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:22 AM
| To: Tomcat Developers List
| Subject: Re: Coyote/Http11 under loa
Keith Wannamaker wrote:
Same box, same app, same test, with Tomcat 4.0.6's http10 and 11 adaptor:
coyote/http1137rq/sec, 406kb/sec
http10 30rq/sec, 181kb/sec
I've always held that 3.3 was more "lean and mean" than 4.0 but
now I'm wondering if this is just indicating some basic arc
Same box, same app, same test, with Tomcat 4.0.6's http10 and 11 adaptor:
coyote/http1137rq/sec, 406kb/sec
http10 30rq/sec, 181kb/sec
I've always held that 3.3 was more "lean and mean" than 4.0 but
now I'm wondering if this is just indicating some basic architectural
differences.
