>> OTOH, I don't think this should be the case, and I think we should
>> stop/start the server socket in that particular case, as was done in the
>> old HTTP connector:
One thing to consider here - the CHUID case, where you bind on 80
and then change the user id.
You can stop the server socket,
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> Bill Barker wrote:
>
> > I don't remember anything like that for 3.3.x (and nothing even close is
> > open in BZ). But, then again, I don't imagine that very many people
> > try and
> > use the Http10Connector in production, and Coyote is only available in the
> > night
ection(Ajp13Int
> erceptor.java:341)
> at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:494)
> at
>
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.jav
> a:516)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
>
>
> Cheers,
> Ha
t.java:494)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.jav
a:516)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
Cheers,
Hans
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Remy Maucherat [mailto:remm@;apache.org]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Oktober 2002 20:15
> An: T
Bill Barker wrote:
+1. As I said above, it probably hasn't shown up in 3.3 mostly because
AJP13 has many fewer accepts.
I'll fix it then.
You have to be careful that no IOException should end up in that code,
otherwise, for each one the server socket will be restarted (not good).
With HTTP/1
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: Bug 13736
> Bill Barker wrote:
>
> > I don't remember anything like that
Bill Barker wrote:
I don't remember anything like that for 3.3.x (and nothing even close is
open in BZ). But, then again, I don't imagine that very many people
try and
use the Http10Connector in production, and Coyote is only available in the
nightly for 3.3 until 3.3.2 comes out.
o.a.t.u.net.
